Bought land and paid money 14 years back but did not register in my name Bought land and paid money 14 years back but did not register in my name

5 years ago

I have bought a land 14 years back by paying complete money but have not registered in my name. We have been Utilising that farming land and paying tax for 14 years. That pand is in a village in Kerala. Now the actual owner of that land is asking huge money to register it in our name. Is there any legal scope to get the land to our money without additional money?

Kishan Dutt Kalaskar

Responded 5 years ago

View All Answers
A.Dear Sir,

You just file suit for declaration and on the ground of adverse possession it may be decreed. The law is as follows:
==============================================================================================================
ADVERSE POSSESSION

There are many judgments and the recent one is as follows:

======================================================================

Protest within 12 years or lose property to squatter

======================================================================
ONE THE ABOVE FORMULA THE OPPOSITE PARTY LOSE ITS CASE.

If a person does not protest someone illegally occupying his property for 12 years, then the squatter would get ownership rights over that property, the Supreme Court has ruled.

A bench of Justices R K Agrawal and A M Sapre said if a person proved actual, peaceful and uninterrupted possession of a property owned by another for more than 12 years, “a case of adverse possession can be held to be made out which, in turn, results in depriving the true owner of his ownership rights in the property and vests ownership rights of the property in the person who claims it”.

However, the bench put in a caveat by ruling that such a person (squatter) must necessarily first admit ownership of the true owner over the property and make the true owner a party to the suit before a court for claiming ownership over the property through adverse possession.
This ruling came in a case where a Muslim man had claimed ownership over a property through adverse possession in Jalgaon of Maharashtra. He had attempted to advance the plea of adverse possession to claim ownership rights over the property, which was inherited by a Muslim woman after the death of her father.

Setting aside a Bombay high court order in favour of the man, the SC bench said, “When both courts below held and, in our view rightly, that the defendant has failed to prove the plea of adverse possession, then such concurrent finding of fact was unimpeachable and binding on the HC. The HC erred fundamentally in observing that it was not necessary for the defendant to first admit the ownership of the plaintiff before raising such a plea.”
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Read Related Answers

question iconFamily agreement on a plot with a house built on it
Dear Client, In a family settlement agreement, all the parties involved should sign the settlement deed in the presence of witnesses and a notary public to make it legally valid and enforceable. The v...
question iconOld house mud wall
Dear Client, No construction is allowed or permissible on the common wall dividing the boundary and metes of land belong to different owners. When your neighbor files a civil suit and obtains an inju...
question iconSuit for separate possession and property
Dear Client, Here, the source of finance that enables a person to acquire a property defines the character of a property. Since your father acquired the property financed by your grandfather and grand...
question iconApartment Issue
Dear Client, In the given scenario, any solution to resolve the issue may cost you more apart from the legal consequences for a couple of days/months. Try your level best to resolve the matter amicabl...
question iconNational Green Tribunal
Dear client, approach a lawyer at your location or any NGO on environmental concerns for drafting a notice to the company.