Procedure of true copy from Court / Police station Procedure of true copy from Court / Police station

5 years ago

Dear Sir / Madam,
My self arun kumar living in a ghaziabad. One of my friend Sandeep Sharma hang himself from fan last year 20 May 2017. His body get down in front of his wife and her relatives, his brother and his relatives was not there. after many time his brother go to police station ask for justice because he was not ready to accept suicide.He told to IO kindly registered a FIR against his wife but IO simply denied that it is suicide. after 6 month later he approach to SSP but nothing happened in this case, Now after 11 month i met with his brother and he told me that police not taken any action. I got some evidences which denied that it not a suicide. Now i want a True Copy of related case from where i can get from police ?, It will be cost to me ? Kindly help me so can do for my friend.

Prithvi Raj Sikka

Responded 5 years ago

View All Answers
A.Hi

File RTI for copy of FIR and post mortem report if they don"t reply then file a petition in court for investigation thereby setting up SIT.

Prithvi Raj Sikka
Law JUirs
Delhi
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Ashish K Dongre

Responded 5 years ago

A.What postmortem reports says?? You can file RTI application for necessary information if police are not providing you.
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Kishan Dutt Kalaskar

Responded 5 years ago

View All Answers
A.Dear Sir,
You can get copies from concerned police station. Also from the office of Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM). The course open to you to file petition under sectin 482 before HC seeking for further investigation. The profoma is as follows.

===========================================================================================================

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
Criminal Petition No.616/2018
(Sub-Divisional Magistrate Court Bengaluru)

MEMORANDUM OF PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973



The petitioner respectfully submits as follows:


1.The address of the petitioner for the purpose of issuance of summons, notices etc., is that of his advocates Sri. Nagaraju, Advocate, No. 96, In front of Park, “Santhrupthi”, 3rd Main Road, ITI Layout, Chandra Layout, First Stage, Bangalore-560039, and also the address shown in the cause title. Whereas the address of the respondents for similar purpose is as shown in the cause title. Respondent no.1 is the Chief Secretary of Government of Karnataka hence made as to this petition, without his knowledge no case can be filed against any Department of the State. In presence as party this petition is necessary. Respondent No.2 is the Head of Department of Home Affairs, Government of Karnataka as such he is made as party to this petition. Not case can be filed against any officer of Police Department without the notice of Head of Department of Home Affairs, hence his presence is necessary in this petition. The Respondent No.3 is unit head of Whitefield area police stations and hence is made as party to this petition. The Respondent No.4 is Inspector of Police, Whitefield in whose jurisdiction the offence was occurred and he who filed report under section 174 of Cr.P.C. hence he is made as party to this petition. The Respondent No.5 is the Deputy Inspector General of Police, CID (Criminal Investigation Department), since petitioners seeks re-investigation by this top police officer hence he is made as party to this petition. Fourth respondent himself suo-motto recorded the statement of The Sub-Divisional Magistrate Court, Bengaluru has accepted the UDR report bearing No.48/2016 dated 03/07/2017, against which the complaint preferred this petition and under challenge. No FIR was issued in this case. The Investigating Officer namely respondent no.4 soon after receiving complaint from Sri. Jagadeesh the father of the deceased registered it as UDR No.48/16 under sectin 174 of Cr.P.C. and to that effect he has made endorsement on the complaint itself. No crime is registered is registered and not issued any FIR and not conducted any preliminary investigation. The respondent on the receipt of complaint came to the conclusion that it is UDR case and accordingly registered as UDR case. The present petitioner is no other than the son of the Complaint that is Sri. Jagadeesh. Thus there is non availability of the FIR in this case which can be made out from the endorsement on the complaint which part of UDR under section 174 of Cr.P.C.
1. The petitioner’s younger sister by name J Gowthami was given in marriage to Parthasarathy and their marriage was performed in the year 2007. On 27.11.2016 the petitioner received a phone call from his relative that his sister J Gowthami committed suicide in her husband house at Whitefield, Bengaluru City. The petitioners immediately rushed to the hospital (Columbia Asia), at Whitefield and was informed that on 26.11.2016 in the night at about 1.00 AM she committed suicide. On that fateful day the deceased Gowthami was residing in her house with her husband and two childrens. The father of petitioner and deceased is an innocent and illiterate person knowing only to sign. All the family members of deceased went to the house of deceased on the day of funeral. At that time the father of husband of deceased requested not to make hue and cry about the incident otherwise he will be badly treated. Under the influence of father of son in law, the father of deceased kept mum as at that time he was not having any evidence to show that it was an unnatural death of his daughter. The police in specific Respondent No.4 that is Inspector of Police, Whitefield, prepared computerized complaint and without explaining the contents therein taken the signature of father of deceased. The husband of deceased also threatened the father of deceased not to reveal anything before the police thus the father of deceased kept mum. The petitioner was also asked keep quiet, since petitioner was not having any material in his hand at relevant point of time kept mum. Thus funeral ceremony was celebrated and all the relatives of deceased including her parents and brothers went to their respective places.
2. The Petitioner further submits that, on 27.11.2017, the family members of deceased wanted to celebrate first death anniversary of deceased in evening on that day. In the morning petitioner was checking all the belongings of his deceased sister which were brought from her in-laws house after the death. At that time to the surprise of petitioner he got one diary and on reading the same it has been brought on record that his deceased sister silently swallowed all the dowry harassments given by her in-laws including her husband, her mother-in-law and sister-in-law. It appears from the wordings of diary notings that the deceased does not want to give trouble to her parents in respect of dowry troubles being given by her husband, mother-in-law and sister-in-law. The deceased was a silent and soft spoken woman as such she never revealed dowry tortures given by above persons. She also not spoken such dowry harassments met by her, to any of her friends or kith and kin as such there was no occasion for the petitioner to know about the tortures given to the deceased by her husband and in-laws. The deceased silently went on noting down major ill treatment incidents in her diary in her hand writing. The following are three such major incidents which led her to take extreme step of suicide under the forcible circumstances. The deceased was not having any alternative except to surrender to death silently. The petitioner came to know about these hard believing facts when he found the diary of deceased and read the contents. The Respondent No.4/Inspector of Police never made any bonafide efforts to find out the cause of death of the deceased. He directly registered the complaint as UDR without issuing any FIR. He has not discharged the duties and responsibilities casted upon him. He treated the death as a casual suicide and never tried to record statements of any relatives or friends of the deceased. Instead in order to hide that truth came under the influence of husband and father-in-law of deceased and extraneous considerations the Respondent No.4/Inspector of Police got computerized typed a formal complaint and made the father of deceased to signed on it without disclosing the contents therein.
3. The Petitioner further submits that, soon after finding the diary of his deceased sister and reading the in cremating contents against her husband and in-laws immediately approached the concerned police in Whitefield and found that the case was closed by filing formal UDR Report No. 0048/2016 under section 174 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. Immediately the petitioners got a copy of the same, it is produced herewith as ANNEXURE-A. The petitioner read all the contents of the diary maintained by his deceased sister and come to a conclusion that it is a clear case of dowry death and he seeks justice by knocking at the doors of this Hon’ble Court. The petitioner herewith produces three material and major incidents written by his sister in the diary in her own hand writings as notings, the same are produced herewith as ANNEXURE-B, C and D. The typed copies of above diary notings are herewith produced as ANNEXURE-B1, C1 and D1 A The contents these annexures are produced below for kind perusal of Hon’ble Court:

xxxxxxxx
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, the petitioner humbly prays that the Hon’ble Court may kindly pass to :
a. To call for entire records in UDR Report No.0048/2016 dated 03.07.2017 from the office of Respondent No.4.
b. To quash the impugned UDR Report No.0048/2016 dated 03.07.2017 filed by Respondent No.4 produced at Annexure-A.
c. To issue suitable directions to Respondent No.5 that is CID or any other specialized investigating agency to conduct re-investigation into the above matter and book the culprits who are responsible for the death of petitioner’s sister Gowthami.
d. And to pass appropriate orders and Grant such other relief as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case.


Advocate for Petitioner
Place: Bengaluru
Dated:
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

GANESH SHARMA

Responded 5 years ago

A.Hello
First of all go to civil hospital and take a copy of Postmortem report.
Best way to proceed further
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Read Related Answers

question iconPolice has filed incorrect Final A Report
Dear client, you can to file an application under section 173(8) of CRPC in the court for futher investigation as contending that the final report filed by IO is a flawed one.
question iconsec 313 of crpc
Dear Client, Under Order VIII Rule 9, the Court has the power to call upon both parties to file written statements at any time and this power should be freely used for elucidating the pleas when neces...
question iconCase is not allocated to court
Dear Sir, It is kept in cold storage and within next 15-30 days if it is not allocated to any other Court then you have to physically go to the Court and check personally.
question iconNeed suggestion for quashing
Dear Client, For quashing the FIR, you have to file a petition under sec 482 if ipc in the high court of jurisdiction. Then accordingly the court will decide the issue.
question iconLEGAL NOTICE
Dear Client, Anyone can send a legal notice to another, whether in their individual capacity or through an authorized representative lawfully capable of doing so, with the help of a lawyer. Legal noti...