Problem
3 years ago
Sir , mai raat 2 baje ghoom raha tha sadak par phir police ayee mujhe thane le gayi subh papa aye tho supurdigi kar k chodh diya to police verification mae koi dikkat sir
Sanjay Kumar Jha
Responded 3 years ago
A.Dear Client,
No issue, no need to worry at all. You do, what you want to proceed.
Thanks,
No issue, no need to worry at all. You do, what you want to proceed.
Thanks,
Helpful
Helpful
Share
A.No Dikaat , kyoon ki aap sirf ghoom rahee thee.... Raat Maai.. Asee maat ghumna.... Phir police akee pakad legi toh problem haai..
If you realize my professional skills, the time & efforts put in by me needs to be truly appreciated, and then Please “CLICK MY LIKES/ THUMBS UP/GIFT” button shown below this reply format & also CLICK/ WRITE a “REVIEW” in 5 star as I have answered your query in detail. Hope this information is useful
ADV. ANISH PALKAR (High Court)
If you realize my professional skills, the time & efforts put in by me needs to be truly appreciated, and then Please “CLICK MY LIKES/ THUMBS UP/GIFT” button shown below this reply format & also CLICK/ WRITE a “REVIEW” in 5 star as I have answered your query in detail. Hope this information is useful
ADV. ANISH PALKAR (High Court)
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Srinivasa Prasad
Responded 3 years ago
A.You need not worry.
The Police took you to PS only as a precautionary measure.
Until case is booked and FIR is registered you need not worry.
NOTE:
Do not go out during late night and give trouble to one and all, further, due to prevailing situation of CORONA.
Be Careful.
The Police took you to PS only as a precautionary measure.
Until case is booked and FIR is registered you need not worry.
NOTE:
Do not go out during late night and give trouble to one and all, further, due to prevailing situation of CORONA.
Be Careful.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
A.PETTY OFFENCES NO HURDLE FOR JOBS SUPREME COURT
Non disclosure of conviction in minor offences like traffic offences, railway offenses and other offence is not a substantial offence and not regular trial is held so supreme court says as follow. You should not disclose, nothing will happen. You will be safe.
==========================================================
PETTY OFFENCES NO HURDLE FOR JOBS SUPREME COURT
Supreme Court has ruled that non-disclosure of petty offences of the past, like shouting slogans, in the curriculum vitae should not ordinarily be a ground to deny a job.
Coming to the rescue of student leaders who face difficulty in landing a job because of police cases for leading protests, the Supreme Court has ruled that non-disclosure of petty offences of the past, like shouting slogans, in the curriculum vitae should not ordinarily be a ground to deny a job.
"'McCarthyism' is antithesis to constitutional goal, chance of reformation has to be afforded to young offenders in suitable cases, interplay of reformative theory cannot be ruled out in toto nor can be generally applied but is one of the factors to be taken into consideration while exercising power for cancelling candidature or discharging an employee from service,“ a bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi, Arun Mishra and P C Pant said.
Example:
• Railway fines and Attestation Form
I was fined Rs. 340 by Police at a Railway Station for crossing the Railway Tracks. I was made to sign some papers and they took my name, father's name, contact and local police station name. An entry was made in the Police Diary as well with my contact. However, I did not get the receipt and paid at the Police Unit on the station itself. Now I am in a dilemma as what to do with the Attestation Form for Government Jobs. The questionnaire in the Self declaration attestation form goes like this :
You may answer as follows in the above background:
a) Have you ever been arrested? Yes/No …No.
b) Have you ever been prosecuted? Yes/No ….No
c) Have you ever been kept under detention? Yes/No …No
d) Have you ever been bouned down? Yes/No …No.
e) Have you ever been fined by a Court of Law? Yes/No …No.
f) Have you ever been convicted by a Court of Law for any offence? Yes/No….No.
Section 188 in The Indian Penal Code
188. Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant.—Whoever, knowing that, by an order promulgated by a public serv¬ant lawfully empowered to promulgate such order, he is directed to abstain from a certain act, or to take certain order with certain property in his possession or under his management, disobeys such direction, shall, if such disobedience causes or tends to cause obstruction, annoyance or injury, or risk of obstruction, annoyance or injury, to any person lawfully employed, be punished with simple impris¬onment for a term which may extend to one month or with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees, or with both; and if such disobedience causes or trends to cause danger to human life, health or safety, or causes or tends to cause a riot or affray, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.
Explanation.—It is not necessary that the offender should intend to produce harm, or contemplate his disobedience as likely to produce harm. It is sufficient that he knows of the order which he disobeys, and that his disobedience produces, or is likely to produce, harm. Illustration An order is promulgated by a public servant lawfully empowered to promulgate such order, directing that a religious procession shall not pass down a certain street. A knowingly disobeys the order, and thereby causes danger of riot. A has committed the offence defined in this section.
If my answer is helpful to you then please give my FIVE STAR
Non disclosure of conviction in minor offences like traffic offences, railway offenses and other offence is not a substantial offence and not regular trial is held so supreme court says as follow. You should not disclose, nothing will happen. You will be safe.
==========================================================
PETTY OFFENCES NO HURDLE FOR JOBS SUPREME COURT
Supreme Court has ruled that non-disclosure of petty offences of the past, like shouting slogans, in the curriculum vitae should not ordinarily be a ground to deny a job.
Coming to the rescue of student leaders who face difficulty in landing a job because of police cases for leading protests, the Supreme Court has ruled that non-disclosure of petty offences of the past, like shouting slogans, in the curriculum vitae should not ordinarily be a ground to deny a job.
"'McCarthyism' is antithesis to constitutional goal, chance of reformation has to be afforded to young offenders in suitable cases, interplay of reformative theory cannot be ruled out in toto nor can be generally applied but is one of the factors to be taken into consideration while exercising power for cancelling candidature or discharging an employee from service,“ a bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi, Arun Mishra and P C Pant said.
Example:
• Railway fines and Attestation Form
I was fined Rs. 340 by Police at a Railway Station for crossing the Railway Tracks. I was made to sign some papers and they took my name, father's name, contact and local police station name. An entry was made in the Police Diary as well with my contact. However, I did not get the receipt and paid at the Police Unit on the station itself. Now I am in a dilemma as what to do with the Attestation Form for Government Jobs. The questionnaire in the Self declaration attestation form goes like this :
You may answer as follows in the above background:
a) Have you ever been arrested? Yes/No …No.
b) Have you ever been prosecuted? Yes/No ….No
c) Have you ever been kept under detention? Yes/No …No
d) Have you ever been bouned down? Yes/No …No.
e) Have you ever been fined by a Court of Law? Yes/No …No.
f) Have you ever been convicted by a Court of Law for any offence? Yes/No….No.
Section 188 in The Indian Penal Code
188. Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant.—Whoever, knowing that, by an order promulgated by a public serv¬ant lawfully empowered to promulgate such order, he is directed to abstain from a certain act, or to take certain order with certain property in his possession or under his management, disobeys such direction, shall, if such disobedience causes or tends to cause obstruction, annoyance or injury, or risk of obstruction, annoyance or injury, to any person lawfully employed, be punished with simple impris¬onment for a term which may extend to one month or with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees, or with both; and if such disobedience causes or trends to cause danger to human life, health or safety, or causes or tends to cause a riot or affray, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.
Explanation.—It is not necessary that the offender should intend to produce harm, or contemplate his disobedience as likely to produce harm. It is sufficient that he knows of the order which he disobeys, and that his disobedience produces, or is likely to produce, harm. Illustration An order is promulgated by a public servant lawfully empowered to promulgate such order, directing that a religious procession shall not pass down a certain street. A knowingly disobeys the order, and thereby causes danger of riot. A has committed the offence defined in this section.
If my answer is helpful to you then please give my FIVE STAR
Helpful
Helpful
Share
A.No Problem it is routine it happens with advocates also
If u Feel answer is best Please give 5 stars
If u Feel answer is best Please give 5 stars
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Read Related Answers
Regarding shared private road
Dear Sir,
You may file a suit for permanent injunction and avoid interference or use of your private road by others.
Redevelopment rent not paid 5 months and given possession dec 2023
Dear Sir,
It is better to get issue a legal notice and proceed legally by filing a suit for recovery of such amount.
Acceptability of an affidavit from a 1st class Judicial magistrate
Dear Client,
An affidavit is a legal document that is used to state facts under oath. The affidavit should be made on a stamp paper of the appropriate value as per the state where the applicant reside...
Need advice to go for high court
Dear Client,
After the lapse of 15 years from the date of the cause of action, your claim is now barred by law of limitation, and in the absence of any cogent grounds of delay in filing an appeal befo...
Fathers name correction in childs 10th CBSE marksheet
Revised CBSE Rules of correction/change in name/DoB are as under
Dear Sir,
The following link explains you how to change.
http://cbse.nic.in/faq/revised_dob_name_corr_rules_2015.pdf
Rules regarding Co...
Read Blogs on Civil
Civil Lawyers
Find Lawyers by Location
