A.Dear Sir,
It all depends upon the company rules normally not entitled.
Rate me Five Star*
It all depends upon the company rules normally not entitled.
Rate me Five Star*
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Ayantika Mondal @ Prime Legal
Responded 3 years ago
A.Hi.
The trainees are apprentices engaged under the parliamentary law of an organization or under the Apprentices Act and cannot come within the ambit of the Employee Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Section 2 (f) of the EPF Act “defines an employee to incorporate an apprentice” an apprentice is described as a learner who is paid allowance during the training period.” Therefore, employers don't seem to be obliged to contribute to the PF for them.
The trainees are generally not paid salary, in spite, they're paid stipend. Whether the person is trainee but if the trainee is satisfying S. 2(9) of the ESIC Act, the person will naturally called as ‘Employee’ under the section. Though specifically S. 2(9) has exempted and ignored the apprentices engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961, therefore from here the conclusion is drawn is that ‘Trainee’ is also treated as ‘employee’ but apprentice engaged under the Apprentice Act won't be treated as ‘employee’ under the ESIC Act.
The trainees are apprentices engaged under the parliamentary law of an organization or under the Apprentices Act and cannot come within the ambit of the Employee Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Section 2 (f) of the EPF Act “defines an employee to incorporate an apprentice” an apprentice is described as a learner who is paid allowance during the training period.” Therefore, employers don't seem to be obliged to contribute to the PF for them.
The trainees are generally not paid salary, in spite, they're paid stipend. Whether the person is trainee but if the trainee is satisfying S. 2(9) of the ESIC Act, the person will naturally called as ‘Employee’ under the section. Though specifically S. 2(9) has exempted and ignored the apprentices engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961, therefore from here the conclusion is drawn is that ‘Trainee’ is also treated as ‘employee’ but apprentice engaged under the Apprentice Act won't be treated as ‘employee’ under the ESIC Act.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
A.Hi.
The trainees are apprentices engaged under the parliamentary law of an organization or under the Apprentices Act and cannot come within the ambit of the Employee Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Section 2 (f) of the EPF Act “defines an employee to incorporate an apprentice” an apprentice is described as a learner who is paid allowance during the training period.” Therefore, employers don't seem to be obliged to contribute to the PF for them.
The trainees are generally not paid salary, in spite, they're paid stipend. Whether the person is trainee but if the trainee is satisfying S. 2(9) of the ESIC Act, the person will naturally called as ‘Employee’ under the section. Though specifically S. 2(9) has exempted and ignored the apprentices engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961, therefore from here the conclusion is drawn is that ‘Trainee’ is also treated as ‘employee’ but apprentice engaged under the Apprentice Act won't be treated as ‘employee’ under the ESIC Act.
The trainees are apprentices engaged under the parliamentary law of an organization or under the Apprentices Act and cannot come within the ambit of the Employee Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Section 2 (f) of the EPF Act “defines an employee to incorporate an apprentice” an apprentice is described as a learner who is paid allowance during the training period.” Therefore, employers don't seem to be obliged to contribute to the PF for them.
The trainees are generally not paid salary, in spite, they're paid stipend. Whether the person is trainee but if the trainee is satisfying S. 2(9) of the ESIC Act, the person will naturally called as ‘Employee’ under the section. Though specifically S. 2(9) has exempted and ignored the apprentices engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961, therefore from here the conclusion is drawn is that ‘Trainee’ is also treated as ‘employee’ but apprentice engaged under the Apprentice Act won't be treated as ‘employee’ under the ESIC Act.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Read Related Answers
Is constructing a factory legal in local area
Dear Client,
Factories are mostly located outside the city to avoid pollution and commercial congestion. Various types of gases will be released into the atmosphere based on the factory and can harm t...
Experience Service letter after the termination due to unplanned absentism
Dear Client,
On cessation of employment either on resignation or otherwise, an employee deserves an experience certificate or relieving letter from his employer. An employer cannot withhold the relie...
EPF service overlap
Dear Client,
There is no overarching law that prohibits a person from doing multiple jobs. It is not illegal however both companies should not have the clause “cannot take up work full time in some ot...
Not getting my fnf amount
Dear Client,
On cessation of employment either on resignation or otherwise, except for proven misconduct, an employer cannot withhold the relieving letter and F & F Settlement dues of an employee wit...
I have Award passed by Labour court in Refrence IDA
Dear Client,
As per Sec.17(1) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (1) an award (including an arbitration award) shall become enforceable on the expiry of thirty days from the date of its publication u...
Read Blogs on Industrial Laws
Industrial Laws Lawyers
Find Lawyers by Location
