disputes against 7/12 & appeals against tahsil and mulcipal ambarnath
5 years ago
Boja OR claim removed in 1997 on 7/12 utara but again shown after 21 years as at present tahsil office ask to give proof of pmt. to remove boja OR claim but at present I am not having any proof available as case is 45 yrs old As Tahsil office is not ready to remove boja
There is 70 yrs old bldg. declared dhokadayak in which 10 families are staying unauthorised as they are not owner or tenant now 7 families shifted to other place on owner request but 3 families are not ready to leave room. If building collapse if anybody harm. Govt. will put on responsibility on owner
At present after our reqeust letter to mulcipal authoirty they are not ready to take out those 3 families out of bldg.
At present owner is paying house of dhokadayak bldg. to mulcipalty .
in above 2 maters I want appeal to higher authority against Tahsil office and against mulcipal authority ambarnath
Pls. advise me what to do and if appeal how much will be expenses to pay.
Please do let us known the exact location, nearest Court,nearest Municipality and other related Offices of the Government.
The best option for you would be to get an experienced Advocate from the panel of Vidhikarya.com who can sort your matter quickly and may be in a position to give you a quick relief.
Shanti Ranjan Behera
Advocate
ARPIT BATRA
Responded 5 years ago
Deepak Yashwantrao Bade
Responded 5 years ago
Gopal Bansal
Responded 5 years ago
If you are paying house rent of the building which has been declared as a dangerous building as per your sayings, then you will be deemed as the owner of that particular building and in case the above-said dangerous building collapses away, the concerned authorities will definitely try to grab the owner for the same. If the three families which are residing in the above-said building, are neither owner nor tenant of the said property, then you can file a suit for eviction against all of them. You can also seek a mandatory injunction against the concerned municipal authority because it is the duty of the municipal authority to got vacated and collapse the dangerous building in order to avoid any kind of future harm. As far as my professional fees are concerned, I can't disclose the same due to our professional code of conduct but I can ensure you that they are least in the industry. You can contact me through Vidhikarya platform for a detailed conversation on this topic.
Ashish K Dongre
Responded 5 years ago
Vishwabandhu
Responded 5 years ago
I f want to engage me as a lawyer then contact me through vidhikarya. My charges r very less.
Vinayak Mistry
Replied 5 years ago
Sir there are 9 unauthorised occupier stayin in 12 rooms in bldg. out of them 2 have done MOU in 1974 and 7 done MOU in 1989, 1991, and 1995 to sale rooms they have paid 50 to 60% advance of total fixed cost of room and MOU also not registrard from date of MOU till date house tax is paid by owner. electricity paid by themselves, water bill paid by owner but due to non payment of bill line has cut of. at present no body is ready to leave room and to vacant or to give to builder for development in addition same bldg. is declard dhokadayak and may be collapse at any time
in auch situation owner may be grabed govt. similarly mulcipaly also njot ready to take responsibilty to get demolish it saying that its a private proeprty.
in above situation what step to take to demolish bldg and to get vacant rooms from occupier
as our economic condition is lower middle class we can not wait for year to year for judgement so what is another way to solve this problem but legally
Agriculture Land Purchased in Gujarat from Non-Farmer Seller
Registered legal entity as nominee of chs flat Mumbai
Sc st land purchase by obc mp dist narmdapuram
Property share
Hiring of professionals as executor of a will
