jewellery recovery application order is interlocutory or intermediat

state filed the u/s 498a , 506 case after that  i filled an application to recover the jewellery Judge mentioned the below comments in order to dismiss the application This order of mine shall dispose of the application for taking jewellery articles from locker No. 2234 in Central Bank of India, Gurugram in the joint name of complainant and accused filed by the counsel of applicant/complainant. Firstly, it is pertinent to mention here that the present application is not maintainable under the provisions of code of criminal procedure, 1973. The proper remedy for the applicant is to file a case under the provisions of the protection of women from the domestic violence act, 2005. Jewellery articles are not the case property in present case. They have not been recovered from accused persons in any form. Code of criminal procedure deals with release of case property at the stage of trial. Therefore, the present application is not maintainable in its form. Hence, the present application is dismissed. I went to file revision u/s 397 crpc but the reader told me this is an interlocutory order and revision can not be filed now i have mentioned the below line in my revision petition, will it remove the bar of interlocutory order? This order affects the rights of the women to get her own jewelry property/Stridhan due to this above-mentioned order would not be an interlocutory order and the present revision is not barred u/s 397(2). the lower court order is intermediate or interlocutory order?