Corruption & Parliamentary Privileges


Posted On : July 7, 2021
Corruption & Parliamentary Privileges
Irregularities and arbitrariness are not the way in which any ideal law, rule or order is imposed. Law and order are ideally used to remove these irregularities. Similarly, when we analyse the article and provisions and the rules that assert the presence and effectiveness of Parliamentary Privilege we do come across numerous loopholes and fallacies which reforms and newer methods and rights could help reduce.
Listen to this article

Table of Contents

 Parliament is responsible for the most important function i.e. formulating laws. Amending former laws to bring forth changes suitable to the present society require series of dedicated debates, discourse, deliberations and discussion. Similarly passing a new bill or act is not only a time-consuming process but also requires dedicated services of the members so that the law is suitable nationally. Therefore, certain free environment and rights and liberties is a necessity.

Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Raja Ram Pal vs Speaker, Lok Sabha & Ors passed an erudite judgment and specified the essence behind providing these privileges through the Constitution and also discussed the limits of judiciary in cases of similar subject matter. The Honourable Bench cited the views of renowned authors and jurists and firmly stated that the purpose of providing such privileges was only to provide enough impunity to the members so that they do not face undue hindrance while discharging their constitutionally specified duties. This was granted while keeping in mind the interest of the whole nation and hence these exemptions and privileges are basic and limited in nature. In cases of misuse and abuse, the parent body i.e. the Parliament holds the power to take actions against such abusers since the basic objective is to safeguard Parliament authority and dignity. This concept is taken from British Constitution and helps to uphold the supremacy of the Parliament.

Though it is agreed that granting privileges to the MLAs and MPs is necessary for the functioning of democracy in a democratic setup however it is essential that such special privilege only serves the purpose of providing necessary exemplary rights for smooth functioning of the legislator bodies. Therefore, they must be duly revised from time to time so that they do not create excessive overriding effects in conflicts of national importance. Moreover it is a necessity to punish or provide certain deterrence since disrupting or delaying the Parliament is also an undignified behaviour that delays the important functions of the House. 

Corruption Charges and Conflict with Constitutionally Granted Privileges

First significant case that highlighted the issue of bribery and corruption for casting votes in favour of the decided, was the case P. V. Narasimha Rao v. State. In the debate of Lokpal Bill Late Arun Jaitley mentioned that corruption was perceived as a way of life and we should form laws in consonance with Article 105 for curbing it. The news and mention of scams always involves members of the parliament thus clearly implying that these deep rooted problem derives certain benefits from the privileges granted to Parliamentarians.

Benefits and privileges are granted to them so that they could perform their duties unhindered as proceeding could be initiated based on fabricated evidences and with malicious intent. Therefore, it is imperative that they are protected from such proceedings otherwise they could be widely used as a means to disrupt the members to reach the house for important discussions or important voting days. In Lalu Prasad case,of massive corruption SC relied on previous judgement of PV Narsimha case and adjudicated that since there were sufficient evidentiary grounds for proving corruption charges the petitioner could be prosecuted without the permission of the Parliament since it is the duty of the officers to request and seek permission of the Speaker before filing charge sheets.

In cases where it provable that the act has evidences and the act does not come under the purview of act of state or sovereign act then no civil or criminal immunity could stop any legal actions taken against the corrupt public servant- MP/MLA.

Immunity provisions mentioned in Article 105(2) for these members of the Parliament are a standard feature in modern democratic states and are deemed to be necessary to ensure that the powers of the three organs of the state are distributed and separated. Yet there is a fundamental requirement for accountability which clashes with undue eternal pressure. However, in the favour of spirit of democracy it is essential that measures merely beyond the Parliamentary committee are brought into place to curb corruption and scams. International bodies are demanding establishment of International Corruption Courts along with the wavering of immunities for corrupt members. This was also suggested by a national commission wherein they suggested that Article 105(2) should be amended to dis-include immunities in cases of corruption associated with their work while simultaneously providing courts to take cognizance after consultation with the speaker along with the intervention of media. Since best anti-corruption laws would be that involve the state as well as the society since giving bribe is also be one of the major reasons for widespread multi layered corruption.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Irregularities and arbitrariness are not the way in which any ideal law, rule or order is imposed. Law and order are ideally used to remove these irregularities. Similarly, when we analyse the article and provisions and the rules that assert the presence and effectiveness of Parliamentary Privilege we do come across numerous loopholes and fallacies which reforms and newer methods and rights could help reduce. It has been established above that speech without constraints is important for free expression especially when one such expression concerns the interest of hundreds. However, any expression that hinders the rights and interests of the rest of the population, which is in billions, is far more valuable. Hence, disrupting the proceedings of the Parliament to satisfy the emotions of their party members or to fuel a feud or to distract disrupt or just annoy the other members mostly the ruling party is an undignified and intolerable behaviour which should be vehemently condemned and strictly punishable. Debates, discourse and discussions are important for deliberations in the Parliament but delays due to over liberated rights granted to the members is not a part of democratic state and hence should be stopped via amendment or major reform in the constitutionally granted privilege. Moreover, indistinctness of certain terms of Article 105 is also not in favour of democracy since it connotes to varied interpretations which result in confusion and non-uniformity. Every new assembly and every new speaker will come up with different disciplinary perspectives which will widely change the conduct of the Parliament.

Judicial restrictions on the extent of this immunity limits the punitive actions hence also fails to address the larger issues of corruption and ethics, especially legislative ethics. Also, the opposition is seated to question the government in favour of the general public not in favour of private political parties or just ensuring that every single discussion and proceedings goes futile. We deal with large population, huge arrears of bills to be passed and such delays are in no way in favour of the interests of the citizens hence should be condemned in a stricter manner so that they do not imperil democratization. Proper parameters that are de-political should be put into place to check these privileges through means of well- defined regulations for a holistic reform. Moreover there should be a system of educating public and future parliamentarians about the need of proper ethics within the dignified houses while having a heated discussion.

These parliamentary privileges are granted to make the life of a member of both houses easier inside the Parliamentary premises. However, it is long due that certain life lessons of ethics, morals and cooperation while conflict, also be imparted to them via a major reform which ideally is -Codification of Parliamentary Privileges.

 
Written By:
Anik

Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markReporting Corruption 1 Response(s)
Hi, You have to file a complaint before the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister, and one copy should be sent to the IGR of the state govt.
question markOverwriting in Register-II and rejection of application for mutation 1 Response(s)
Dear Client, When you uploaded for mutation or recertification in the quantity of land through online mode to the concerned authority, you might have uploaded a copy of the land deed, land map, and other relevant documents required for the purpose. When any overwriting or tampering of the quantity of land is not noticed in the original land deed and map which is under your possession, in the prevailing situation, you may file a suit against the concerned authority before a competent Court praying for forensic investigation of the documents/records lying with the public authority who reported overwriting or tampering of the records to access the veracity behind the said report on the basis of which your applications were delayed and rejected. You may seek the desired information invoking Sec.6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 by making an application u/s.6(1) of the Act seeking the desired information from the concerned public authority who is the custodian of the land records which is required to be responded within 30 days of from the receipt of the Application sent by registered post as per Sec.7(1) of the Act. Reach out to an Advocate for guidance and steps in the matter.
question markMisconduct 2 Response(s)
Dear client, If he does send the clip, then you may be punished by said office or authority for misconduct. But this depends upon the language used and the context in which it was said. Simply complaining about some work, etc. may not lead to you getting punished. Thank you.
question markPrevention of corruption act amended 2018 7 Response(s)
Dear Sir, You can go through the following FAQs and file a complaint accordingly to CBI ============================================================================================= 1.Can CBI take over the investigation of a criminal case registered by the State Police? Yes, it can, in the following situations (i) The concerned State Government makes a request to that effect and the Central Government agrees to it (Central Government generally seeks comment of CBI before deciding upon the request of the State) (ii) The State Government issues notification of consent under section 6 of the DSPE Act and the Central Government issues notification under section 5 of the DSPE Act (iii) The Supreme Court or High Courts orders CBI to take up such investigations. 2. Please give brief background of CBI. During the period of World War II, a Special Police Establishment (SPE) was constituted in 1941 in the Department of War of the British India to enquire into allegations of bribery and corruption in the war related procurements. Later on it was formalized as an agency of the Government of India to investigate into allegations of corruption in various wings of the Government of India by enacting the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946 . In 1963, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was established by the Government of India with a view to investigate serious crimes related to Defence of India, corruption in high places, serious fraud, cheating and embezzlement and social crime, particularly of hoarding, black-marketing and profiteering in essential commodities, having all-India and inter-state ramifications. CBI derives its legal powers to investigate crime from the DSPE Act, 1946. 3. Who exercises supervision over CBI? The superintendence of CBI related to investigation of offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 lies with the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and in other matters with the Department of Personnel & Training (DOPT) in the Ministry of Personnel, Pension & Grievances of the Government of India. 4. How can one join CBI? CBI recruits Sub-inspectors through the Staff Selection Commission (SSC), which publishes its recruitment notice in Employment News and other leading dailies. CBI also inducts officers in the ranks of Inspector of Police and above from the State and Union Territory Police forces on deputation. Non-police officers are also taken on deputation in CBI. The necessary details about various posts in CBI, recruitment/induction procedure, vacancy statement etc. are all posted on this website and the same may please be referred to. Special attention is drawn towards the 'Administration Manual' of CBI available in the 'About Us' link as well as the link 'Inside CBI' in this regard. 5. Do CBI personnel get any special incentive allowance? All the executive officers of CBI from the rank of constable to the Director get special allowance. The rate is 25% of the pay for ranks up to the Superintendent of Police and 15% above it. 6. What types of Crime CBI investigate today? CBI has grown into a multidisciplinary investigation agency over a period of time. Today it has the following three divisions for investigation of crime:- (i) Anti-Corruption Division - for investigation of cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against Public officials and the employees of Central Government, Public Sector Undertakings, Corporations or Bodies owned or controlled by the Government of India - it is the largest division having presence almost in all the States of India. (ii) Economic Offences Division - for investigation of major financial scams and serious economic frauds, including crimes relating to Fake Indian Currency Notes, Bank Frauds and Cyber Crime. (iii) Special Crimes Division - for investigation of serious, sensational and organized crime under the Indian Penal Code and other laws on the requests of State Governments or on the orders of the Supreme Court and High Courts. The laws under which CBI can investigate Crime are notified by the Central Government under section 3 of the DSPE Act. 7. What is the difference between the nature of the cases investigated by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and the CBI? The NIA has been constituted after the Mumbai terror attack in November 2008 mainly for investigation of incidents of terrorist attacks, funding of terrorism and other terror related crime, whereas CBI investigates crime of corruption, economic offences and serious and organized crime other than terrorism. 8. Can CBI suo-moto take up investigation of any crime anywhere in the Country? No. As per section 2 of the DSPE Act, CBI can suo-moto take up investigation of offences notified in section 3 only in the Union Territories. Taking up investigation by CBI in the boundaries of a State requires prior consent of that State as per Section 6 of the DSPE Act. The Central Government can authorize CBI to investigate such a crime in a State but only with the consent of the concerned State Government. The Supreme Court and High Courts, however, can order CBI to investigate such a crime anywhere in the country without the consent of the State. 9. Can you post some general guidance for approaching CBI for registration of crime? CBI is a specialized agency meant for investigation of crime relating to Corruption by Public Servants under the control of the Central Government, serious economic offences and frauds and sensational crime having inter-state/all-India ramifications. CBI does not take up investigation of general and routine nature of crime as the Police forces of the State and Union Territories are meant to investigate such crime. As far as crime of corruption by Public Servants of the Central Government is concerned, an individual can approach any anti-corruption branch of CBI nearest to him, anywhere in the country. CBI has such branches in all the State Capitals and many other cities. CBI has branches for registration of Economic and Special Crime offences in all the four metropolitan cities, viz. Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai. Any of these branches can be approached for providing information about serious economic offences as well as serious special crimes such as drug and human trafficking, fake currency, poaching of wild life, adulteration of drugs and food products, organized crime having all-India/inter-State ramifications. The details of CBI branches together with their jurisdiction are posted on this website in the link 'CBI Network'. As stated above, local Police in the States and UTs should be approached for registration of crimes of general and routine nature. This does not mean that they should not be approached for registration of serious offences. It is only meant to say that CBI should not be approached for general and routine nature of Economic and Special offences. 10. How can local branches of CBI in States be approached for complaints of corruption against Public Servants under the control of Central Government working in States, when it requires prior consent of the States for registering crimes happened in the jurisdiction of a State? This is a valid apprehension in view of the answer to question no. 7 above. Most of the States in India, however have given, what is called as the 'general consent' to the Central Government for investigation of complaints of corruption against the public servants under the control of the Central Government working in the States. This means that CBI will not require prior consent in each such case and it can go ahead with the investigation of such complaints as and when received without referring them to the State for consent. Such consent will however require if CBI intends to take up investigation on a complaint against the public servants under the control of the State Government. To put it in different way, most of the State Governments have authorized CBI to undertake investigation against employees of the Central Government, Public Sector Undertakings and Corporations under the Control of Government of India and Banks in their States. 11. Is it necessary for a person to physically approach a branch of CBI for providing information/complaint about crime as listed in the answer to question no. 5 above? Not at all. CBI can be approached by also sending the information/complaint by post, by SMS from a mobile phone, by making a phone call to the concerned Branch, by sending e mails to its officers and by posting the information/complaint on this website. All the required details for above are available on this website in the links 'Contact Us' , 'CBI Network', and 'Join Us in Fighting Corruption' . 12. What are the various means to provide information/lodge complaint with CBI? Please see the answer to question nos.8 & 11. 13. Is it necessary to mention one's identity for giving information/complaint to CBI? Yes, it is. In accordance with the guidelines formulated by the Central Vigilance Commission, India, CBI does not entertain anonymous/pseudonymous information/complaint. Having said this, the informant/complainant can however, always request to keep their identity secret. CBI takes all the necessary care to ensure that identity of such persons is kept secret. 14. How does CBI handle oral information and informants against corruption and serious crime? A large part of crime unearthed by CBI of corruption and serious offences are based on oral information provided by individuals in confidence. CBI has a very well laid down policy of handling such information and informants, which is followed scrupulously. The informant is only handled by the officer to whom the information has been provided. Disclosure of the identity of the informant cannot be demanded even by the senior officers of the officer to whom the information has been provided. The identity of such informant is never put in writing in any record. It is not even disclosed to the courts. Courts also do not have powers to compel CBI to disclose the identity of the informant. No action is initiated by CBI on such information without subjecting them to discreet verification. While taking care that the secrecy of the information is not leaked, such information is put to detailed verification. It is only after ensuring that a prima facie criminal case is made out, a criminal case is registered and further action taken. 15. What is a 'trap'? We often read in newspapers that CBI has caught a public servant in a trap. CBI lays great emphasis on catching corrupt public servants who demand and take bribes. The process of catching such corrupt public servants red handed while they demand and take bribes is popularly called the 'trap'. It is not a legal term. A set procedure has been devised in CBI to lay a trap against a corrupt public servant. The evidence collected during the process of trap is placed before the court along with the charge sheet and is quite important in securing conviction of the public servant. 16. Who provides the money used for laying the trap? The money has to be provided by the complainant and none else. 17. What happens to the money of the complainant provided for laying trap? Such money is an important piece of evidence against the accused, to be used in the court during trail. It is seized by CBI and put up in the court along with the charge sheet. After completion of trial, court orders return of the money to the complainant. The money is, therefore, eventually returned to the complainant after completion of the trial. However, keeping in view the hardships, which may be faced by the complainant because of the deposition of the money in the court, CBI has devised a procedure for refunding an equivalent amount of money to the complainant after filing of the charge sheet. This is done in genuine cases after observing certain formalities including obtaining an order from the court. The tainted bribe money is then deposited in the public exchequer on conclusion of trial. 18. If the complainant is so poor that he cannot arrange bribe money, does it mean that no action can be taken against a corrupt public servant, who demands bribe? Certainly not. Action can be taken in such situations also. As per section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, sheer demand of bribe is a punishable offence. That is to say that acceptance of bribe is not a mandatory requirement to prosecute a public servant. If it can be proved in the court by way of collection of evidence that the public servant had demanded bribe for an official act, the public servant can be convicted. Laying of trap is just a means of collection of evidence to prove the guilt. It is preferred because it facilitates collection of good evidence and makes a case full proof. In the absence of trap, it is difficult to collect evidence of demand of bribe. It, however, does not mean that laying of trap is mandatory and nothing can be done in the absence of a trap. 19. We have often heard that not only bribe taking but bribe giving is also an offence under the law. In that case is not the complainant who hands over the bribe amount to the accused for laying trap is also an accused? Certainly bribe giving is also an offence as per section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, but only when it is given voluntarily. The law however, protects such persons who complaint to the law enforcement agencies soon after demand of bribe by a public servant, even if they had agreed to the demand. Section 24 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 provides such protection and acts of the complainant during the process of laying of trap. No action can, therefore, be taken against complaints in such matters. 20. What should an honest public servant do, when he is offered bribe by a person? As mentioned in answer to question no. 19, voluntarily giving or offering bribe is also a punishable offence under section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. In such a case the honest public servant should inform CBI as soon as such an offer is made by a person. In fact such a bribe giver can also be caught red handed by laying a trap on the complaint of the honest public servant. The honest public servant shall, therefore, take steps to get such persons punished, rather than ignoring or just reprimanding them. This will deter the unscrupulous elements from bribe giving. 21. It is often heard, that public servants in higher positions don't demand or take bribes directly but through the touts or middlemen. Does CBI take action against such touts or middlemen also? Most certainly. Sections 8 & 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 punish such touts/middlemen. On getting information/complaints against such touts/middlemen, CBI lays trap against them with the help of the complainant or otherwise. Further CBI attempts to gather evidence against the concerned public servant also on whose behalf the touts/middlemen are active. Such a public servant is also punishable under section 10 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. CBI requests the general public to provide information about such known touts/middlemen, who are active in many public offices of the Central Government. CBI takes steps to verify such information at its own level and ensure action against such touts/middlemen even without a complainant. 22. Are there cases, when CBI has simultaneously taken action against the willing bribe giver and the bribe taker? Yes, there have been such cases. If CBI receives information about a willing bribe giver and bribe taker from any genuine source before the bribe is actually handed over, it verifies such information and lays a trap to catch both the bribe giver and bribe taker red handed. 23. We often see across ourselves corrupt public servants leading a lavish life style and having possessions much beyond their means. Can CBI take action against such public servants? Most certainly. Possession of assets and incurring expenditure, which are beyond the known source of income of a public servant, is punishable under section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. CBI requests the citizens to provide specific details about assets and expenditure of such public servants. Providing general and vague information, however, does not help. Upon receiving such specific details, CBI conducts discreet verification of the same and conducts raids at the premises of such public servants after registration of a criminal case, if the information is found as correct. 24. Whether CBI keeps the identity of the informant secret? Please see the answer to question no. 14 above. 25. Does CBI give cash reward to the informants? No. There is no such policy in CBI. No cash reward is given to a person who provides information about a crime as mentioned in the answer to question no. 5 above. However, if a person provides information about an accused person wanted in a criminal case and on whom CBI has announced some cash reward, the same is given to the informant if the accused has been caught on such information. 26. Is there an internal vigilance set up in CBI? Yes. CBI has a very strong internal vigilance set up for keeping watch over the conduct of its own personnel. In CBI there is zero tolerance about issues of integrity of its personnel. This can be gauged from the fact that the Bureau does not hesitate in registering criminal cases against its own personnel when there are instances of corruption by them. 27. What is the conviction rate in criminal cases prosecuted by CBI? The conviction rate is as high as 65 to 70% and it is comparable to the best investigation agencies in the world. 28. Why does CBI take so much time in investigation of cases? CBI conducts investigations in the most professional manner. It lays great emphasis in use of science and technology during investigations. It requires evaluation of evidence by Forensic Laboratories and other experts such as Government Examiners of Questioned Documents (GEQDs). This often takes time. Many cases of CBI often require investigation abroad. Collection of evidence in a foreign country depends on many external factors beyond the control of CBI. A letter of request is issued to the concerned country and collection of evidence is requested by the law enforcement agencies of that country. This adds to the delay. In addition to above, there is multi-layer supervision in CBI. The evidence collected is analyzed threadbare both by executive officers and law officers at multiple levels. Because of all these factors, CBI investigations often take time. Having said this, it is important to clarify that investigation of trap cases are generally finished within a period of one month to three months. Of late a great emphasis is being laid in CBI to complete investigations at the earliest. It has been decided that investigation shall be completed within a period of one year. 29. Does CBI perform any other important function other than investigation of crime? Yes. CBI has been notified as the Interpol of India. CBI has a training academy in Ghaziabad, where it organizes training courses in various subjects not only for its own officers but for officers from other countries as well as from State & UT police organizations, vigilance officers of Public Sector Undertakings, Banks etc. 30. What is the role of CBI as Interpol of India? In this era of globalization and information technology crime and criminals easily cross national boundaries. Crime and Criminals have gone transnational. The International Police Criminal Organization (ICPO or Interpol) has emerged as an important institution for strengthening cooperation amongst law enforcement agencies of various countries. As Interpol of India, CBI acts as an interface between the law enforcement agencies of India and other countries to ensure such cooperation. It facilitates exchange and sharing of information by these agencies. It also gets the red notices of the fugitive criminals, wanted in India, published. Besides above it also plays a role in negotiation and finalization of Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) and Extradition Treaties between India and other countries. CBI also facilitates execution of Letter of Requests for Investigation in India and out of India. 31. What is a Red Notice? It is a notice published by the Interpol Headquarters at France on the request of a member country for tracing a fugitive in a criminal case by all the law enforcement agencies of the member countries. If such a fugitive is traced, the requesting country is informed for taking steps for extradition of the fugitive. 32. What role CBI Interpol plays in extradition of a fugitive? CBI Interpol plays a limited role in such matters. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) is the nodal agency for extradition of fugitives. CBI Interpol can help the law enforcement agencies in tracing/locating the fugitive so that it can make a formal request for extradition of the fugitive to the MEA.
question markAnti corruption case 5 Response(s)
Sir If any DVAC cases having legal flaws the high court can take action.