Track Your Request
Track Your Request
+91-7604047602 Our Team About Us Legal Blog Free Legal Advice Login
Menu
Vidhikarya Text Logo
arrow_back

SEDITION LAW IN INDIA- AN INTRINSIC LOOK INTO THE DEVELOPMENTS IN INDIA


SEDITION LAW IN INDIA- AN INTRINSIC LOOK INTO THE DEVELOPMENTS IN INDIA
Sedition is considered to be an offence against the state and through Section 124A of the IPC it punishes any act that subverts the government established by law. The rationale for the criminalisation of such acts is generally that it fosters “an environment and psychological climate conducive to criminal activity” even though it may not incite a specific offence.

Sedition is considered to be an offence against the state and through Section 124A[i] of the IPC it punishes any act that subverts the government established by law. The rationale for the criminalisation of such acts is generally that it fosters “an environment and psychological climate conducive to criminal activity” even though it may not incite a specific offence.[ii] Furthermore, the core elements of sedition are bringing or attempting to bring contempt, hatred or disaffection towards the government.[iii]

If we refer to the essential ingredients for the law of sedition, then they can be divided into four parts, namely- (i) words, signs, visible representations or otherwise; (ii) brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt; (iii) excite disaffection; (iv) government established by law.[iv]The objects of sedition are generally to induce discontent and insurrection, and stir up opposition to the Government, and bring the administration of justice into contempt; and the very tendency of sedition is to incite the people to insurrection and rebellion.[v]

Disaffection means a feeling contrary to affection, in other words, dislike or hatred.[vi] If a person uses either spoken or written words calculated to create in the minds of the persons to whom they are addressed a disposition not to obey the lawful authority of the Government, or to subvert or resist that authority, if and when occasion should arise, and if he does so with the intention of creating such a disposition in his hearers or readers, he/she will be guilty of the offence of attempting to excite disaffection within the meaning of the section, though no disturbance is brought about by his words or any feeling of disaffection, in fact, produced by them.

In the Landmark judgement of Kedar Nath it was held that “It is sufficient for the purposes of the section that the words used are calculated to excite feelings of ill-will against the Government and to hold it up to the hatred and contempt of the people, and that they were used with the intention to create such feeling.”[vii] It means hatred, enmity, dislike, hostility, contempt and every form of ill-will to the Government. if a man excites or attempts to excite feelings of disaffection, great or small, he is guilty under the section.

The court had further observed in the said case that the right guaranteed under Art 19(1) (a) is subject to such reasonable restriction as would come within the purview of clause (2), to Art 19 which comprises (a) security of the State, (b) friendly relations with foreign states, (c) public order, (d) decency or morality, etc. 

In the case of Queen Empress v. Bal Gangadhar Tilak,[viii] the Court interpreted §124A mainly as exciting ‘feelings of disaffection’ towards the government, which covered within its ambit sentiments such as hatred, enmity, dislike, hostility, contempt, and all forms of ill-will. It expanded the scope of the offence by holding that it was not the gravity of the action or the intensity of disaffection, but the presence of feelings that was paramount and mere attempt to excite such feelings was sufficient to constitute an offence.

It is true that it is not sedition to criticise administrative machinery or the officers of Govt. but where the speaker exceeds the limits of fair criticism and his object in attacking the existing Govt. is to create disaffection the speech amounts to sedition. shows a deliberate design to excite feelings of disaffection towards the Government established by law in British India, or to bring that Government into hatred and contempt. The nature and tone of the article.

To come within the protection of the section a writing must not only consist of making comments on government actions with the intent of eliciting only disapprobation of the measures, as opposed to disaffection with the government, but the disapprobation must also be ‘compatible' with a willingness to obey the lawful authority of the government and to defend the lawful authority of the government against unlawful attempts to subvert it. And it is a disposition to support that lawful authority against unlawful attempts not only to ‘resist’ it—that is, to oppose it, but also to ‘subvert’ it—that is, to weaken and undermine it by any unlawful means whatever.[ix]

Further, the word "disaffection" in the section is used in a special sense as meaning political alienation or discontent or disloyalty to the Government or existing authority.[x] They also held that the meaning of word "disaffection" in the main portion of the section was not varied by the explanation. Moreover, the word "disaffection" does not merely mean the absence or negation of love or good will but a positive feeling of aversion, which is akin to ill will, a definite insubordination of authority or seeking to alienate the people and weaken the bond of allegiance, a feeling which tends to bring the Government into hatred and discontent, by imputing base and corrupt motives to it.[xi] In Queen Empress v. Amba Prasad,[xii] Edge, C.J., made copious quotations from various judgments of the Calcutta and the Bombay High Courts. The learned Chief Justice observed that a man may be guilty of the offence defined in §124A of attempting to excite feelings of disaffection against the Government established by law.[xiii]

Sedition means sedition or incitement to mutiny or disaffection from the Sovereign.[xiv] "Sedition is a crime against society, nearly allied to that of treason, and it frequently precedes treason by a short interval."[xv] The Sedition Law in India has its roots in the English Law. The English law considered two important constituents of sedition (1) the oral or written publication of words with (2) an agreement to further a seditious intention.[xvi] Section 124A IPC states that for the commission of offence of sedition is with the object to “excite or attempts to excite disaffection towards the government established by law.[xvii] is said to have committed sedition.

As per the colonial definition of Sedition, it is caused by discontent or dissatisfaction, to create public disturbance, or to lead to civil war[xviii] to bring into hatred or contempt the Monarch or the Government, the laws or constitutions of the realm, and generally all endeavours to promote public disorder. It has become obsolete, redundant and abridged from colonial English law and does not suit the democratic setup of the Indian in the present day/

The context of sedition law and the its constituents are derived from colonial rule and different from the context of a democratic political setup in India.[xix] The objective of the sedition provisions in India was promulgated by the British Raj to help control its Indian subjects. The essence of democracy is criticism of Govt.[xx] The public opinion has changed considerably since and now that India has a democratic Government and therefore a line must be drawn between criticism of the Govt. which should be welcome. [xxi] Law of sedition thought necessary during a period of foreign rule has become inappropriate by the very nature of the change which has come about.[xxii]


[i] Pen. Code, § 124-A (India).

[ii] Modechai Kremnitzer & Khalid Ghanayim, Incitement, Not Sedition in Freedom of Speech and Incitement against Democracy 147, 197 (2000).

[iii] Tanya Agathocleous, Reading for the Political Plot: A Genealogy of Disaffection, 61 Theories of the Nineteenth Century 569, 572 (2019).

[iv] Pen. Code, § 124-A (India).

[v] Nazir Khan & Ors. v. State of Delhi, (2003) 8 SCC 461.

[vi] Queen-Empress v. Jogendra Chunder Bose, ILR (1892) 19 Cal 35; Queen Empress v. Bal Gangadhar Tilak, 1897 SCC OnLine Bom 3.

[vii] Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar, AIR 1962 SC 955.

[viii] Queen Empress v. Bal Gangadhar Tilak, 1897 SCC OnLine Bom 3.

[ix] Queen-Empress v. Amba Prasad, 1897 SCC OnLine All 82.

[x] Paramanand v. Emperor, AIR 1941 All 156.

[xi]Ibid.

[xii] Queen-Empress v. Amba Prasad, 1897 SCC OnLine All 82.

[xiii] Ibid.

[xiv] Codification of the Criminal Law- Treason Sedition and Allied Offences, Law Commission UK

[xv] R. v. Sullivan, (1868) 11 Cox C.C. 51 (US).

[xvi] Smith and Hogan, Criminal Law (3rd ed., 1973).

[xvii] Pen. Code, § 124-A (India).

[xviii] Nazir Khan & Ors. v. State of Delhi, (2003) 8 SCC 461.

[xix] Meher Manga, Sedition Law: A threat to Indian Democracy?, Observer Research Foundation.

[xx] W. Hasbach, The Essence of Democracy, 9 Am Polit Sci Rev. 50, 53 (1915).

[xxi] R.K. Mishra, Freedom of Speech and the Law of Sedition in India, 8 JILI 117, 123 (1966).

[xxii] Constituent Assembly of India Debates (Proceedings)- Volume VII, Parliament of India Lok Sabha. 

Posted On : August 31, 2021

Written By :
Ayantika Mondal @ Prime Legal
Ayantika Mondal @ Prime Legal
Bangalore |

Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markAm I eligible for gratuity?
The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, states that an employee is eligible to get gratuity only after he or she has worked with an organization for at least five years. The employee stands to receive the gratuity amount on his or her superannuation, or at the time of retirement or resignation. So you are not entitled to Gratuity.
question markHow to cancel double registration
What do you mean by double registration- the registration of a property between the same parties two times or between two different parties? If the registration is between the same parties then I wonder how the sub registrar has allowed this? This is not to be allowed and if done then register a cancellation deed at the same registrar office. If you mean same property being registered to two different people by the seller then you will have to filer a title suit in civil court to get your rights and cancellation of other deed.
question markTermination from Central PSU
If you have worked in a PSU for whatever period then they must provide you the experience certificate or at least a release letter indicating your date of joining and date of resigning. If they do not provide you the either then send them a legal notice followed by a case in court preferably in High Court.
question markCan department take an action against me as this is not a case of bigamy but live-in relationship?
You will Keeping in view all the recent judgments of the different hon'ble courts wherein live-in relationship has been seen at equal footing with the marriage your live-in will be be considered akin to marriage more so when you have two children with the live-in relationship.
question markClarification regarding OBC non creamy layer reservation
See you caste certificate is issued by the local authorities like the thsildar/panchayat or circle officer in different states. So once your certificate had been issued then it remains with you for ever regardless of your change of address.
Expert Lawyers in Administrative Law Criminal Cyber, Internet, Information Technology

Please enter the text

Categories

Civil(41)
Family(40)
News(2)
Others(14)
RTI(7)
Sale(5)
Tax(4)
Torts(4)
Will(4)
Writ(1)

Send your queries to

[email protected]
X
Consult Cyber, Internet, Information Technology Lawyers from your City!
Post Your Matter
Post Your Matter to connect with the Lawyer online
Call 7604047602 for any assistance
Our Team
Lawyer Login
Be a Partner
Internship
Career

Download the Lawyers App on

Vidhikarya App on Android Platform
Contact Details
7604047602
[email protected]
505-A, Terminus Building,
Newtown, Action Area I,
Kolkata 700156