Why is RTI Amendment Bill So Controversial?


Posted On : December 19, 2019
The controversy in regard to RTI Amendment Bill has been throughly discussed along with special mention of the amendments.
Listen to this article

Table of Contents

Although the Lok Sabha has passed and ratified The Right to Information Amendment Bill 2019 the Opposition is dead against it. Invectives like ‘dangerous’ and ‘dark day for democracy’ have been hurled against the bill. Changes have been suggested in regard to the terms and conditions of appointment of information commissioners at the center and state levels. The three provisions of the RTI amendment bill have been challenged by the members of Opposition in Parliament and by protesters in the field.


Nonetheless, prior to going forward, the basic things that the RTI Act of 2005 does is based on the existing law which says that the public authorities are required to disclose on


·        their organization, functions, and structure

·        rights and duties of its officers and employees

·        financial data


If the public authorities do not provide the required information of their own volition, then, in that case, its citizen’s right to demand it from them based on the RTI Act. "Public authorities" refer to ministers and government servants among others.


The head of the central information commission is the chief information commissioner and other information commissioners appointed by none other than the President representing the Central Government for a fixed term of five years with the salary of the chief election commissioner’s, as well as the election commissioner's salary respectively. The intent and purpose of this initiative were granting autonomous powers to the central information commission as well as provide protection from government surveillance.


The amendments

` ` ` `

The RTI amendment bill of 2019, excludes the five years tenure of the chief information commissioners and the information commissioners. The payouts on account of salary have been revised. Separate notifications will be sent by the government to both.


Politically, what this means is that the government can and will pose a threat or entice the chief information commissioner and information commissioners with random removal or extension and curtailment or increase in salary depending upon their suitability for the ruling dispensation.


Call 7604047601 for consultation with a registered expert right to information lawyer on Vidhikarya.

Written By:
Avik  Chakravorty

Avik Chakravorty


Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markspouse issue 2 Response(s)
Hi, Since this is a false case of 498A, you can file a suit for defamation and mental cruelty on all the grounds you mentioned above. It can also be taken as a ground for divorce if you desire to seek so. If you like my answer, please give a good review.
question markAmendment subject to no relation back eviction suit rent control act bombay 1 Response(s)
Dear sir/madam Please contact local advocate having awareness about local laws.
question markBill for the purchase of a computer printer 1 Response(s)
Dear Client You can complaint in writing to the nesrest police station about this act. I hope it helps
question markRTI Query - I filed an RTI application 1 Response(s)
Dear Client, The citizens have no right to repeat the same or similar or slightly altered information request under the RTI Act, 2005, for which he already got a response.
question markIS SERVICE RULE AMENDMENT CAN BE APPLIED RETROSPECTIVE IN ANY GOVT. JOB ? 1 Response(s)
Dear Sir Normally it cannot be retrospective effect Please give me RANK FIVE(5) if my answer satisfies you