+917604047601
You took out a loan with good intentions to pay it back but your unforeseen financial problems such as job loss medical emergency or business struggle made you miss some EMIs. When borrowers fail to meet repayment obligations the bank or NBFC chooses to file criminal charges which include Sections 420 (cheating) (now Section 318 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) (now Section 316 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). These criminal offenses fall into two categories since they are both cognizable and carry non-bailable status that allows law enforcement to arrest and deny bail permission to suspects.
Sounds shocking? Well, it’s happening. The analysis examines the worrying phenomenon through which banks and NBFCs use criminal procedures to pressure indebted individuals.
Why Are Banks & NBFCs Filing Criminal Cases for Loan Recovery?
Loan defaults normally follow civil procedures which lenders use along with:
- Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs)
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016
- SARFAESI Act, 2002 (for secured loans)
Banks together with NBFCs have started more frequently using criminal statutes for these actions:
- Some borrowers settle their loans through quick payments or resort to new borrowing to resolve their situations because the threats of arrest and legal prosecution create excessive fear.
- The duration for civil proceedings spans years while criminal proceedings apply immediate pressure on borrowers.
- The application of criminal charges against borrowers enables financial institutions to target borrowers personally rather than using their assets for repayment purposes.
- The legal and ethical framework must answer whether debt-default is sufficient cause to consider a person criminally responsible for their inability to pay back their debt.
Legal Provisions Being Misused
1. Section 405 IPC (Now Section 316 of BNS, 2023) – Criminal Breach of Trust
What it says
If someone entrusted with money or property dishonestly misuses it, it amounts to criminal breach of trust.
Punishment
Up to 3 years imprisonment, fine, or both.
Cognizable & Non-Bailable
The police can arrest you without prior approval.
How it’s misused?
Lenders allege that the borrower misused the loan amount, making it a case of criminal breach of trust instead of a simple default.
2. Section 420 IPC (Now Section 317 of BNS, 2023) – Cheating & Fraud
What it says
If a person dishonestly induces another to hand over money by deception, it amounts to cheating.
Punishment
Up to 7 years imprisonment, fine, or both.
Cognizable & Non-Bailable
This makes it extremely serious.
How it’s misused?
Banks claim that borrowers never intended to repay from the beginning, framing them under cheating instead of financial distress.
Why this is a Problem
1. Criminalizing Financial Hardship
When a borrower defaults on a loan because of financial trouble they cannot be labeled as a criminal. When wrongly applied criminal legislation turns innocent borrowers into perceived fraudulent borrowers.
2. Misuse of the Legal System
Financial difficulties should not generate criminal consequences after money borrowing unless the borrower proves loan fraud intent. The ongoing backlog at courts becomes worse since this practice adds more cases.
3. Reputational & Financial Ruin for Borrowers
The police intervention together with the filing of FIRs has the potential to ruins a borrower's reputation in their personal life and work environment.
Legal action combined with potential arrests creates excessive financial expenses for borrowers.
Difficulties in future loan approvals due to a criminal record.
Judicial Take
Multiple times Indian judicial bodies have expressed their disapproval of making loan defaults into criminal offenses:
1. Supreme Court: Cheating Requires Fraudulent Intent from the Start
Case: Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar (2000)
According to court decisions victims who fail to repay loans without fraudulent intent in the beginning should not face cheating allegations. The law requires fraudulent intentions to be present from the initial stage of an agreement.
2. Delhi High Court: No Criminal Case for Civil Disputes
Case: M/s Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Ltd. & Others (2006)
The court declared that criminal law should not be utilized for solving contractual disagreements because the correct remedy would be through civil actions.
The Process for Dealing with Criminal Cases Against You
1. Submit a petition for quashing the FIR to the High Court
According to Section 482 CrPC which is now known as Section 357 BNSS 2023 you may seek High Court permission to dismiss an upside-down FIR based on its lack of merit.
Judicial authorities have dismissed these matters when borrowers demonstrate no fraudulent purpose during transactions.
2. Apply for Anticipatory Bail
Such offenses lack the provision of bail so you should seek anticipatory bail ahead of time to prevent detention by authorities.
3. Prove Your Good Faith Through Civil Remedies
Supply evidence of EMI payments and documentation on restructuring agreements as well as evidence of financial hardships to demonstrate innocent borrower status.
4. Negotiate with the Lender
Seek out possible loan settlements with the lender to prevent time-consuming court battles.
FAQs
1. Is it possible to face arrest due to loan default?
A criminal case proceeding under Sections 420 or 406 IPC now qualified as Laws 316 and 317 BNS, 2023 becomes non-bailable and cognizable. You can file for anticipatory bail against the application for First Information Report.
2. What if I truly intended to repay my debts yet failed to do so?
Your case becomes weak as long as you do not demonstrate dishonest intentions. The judicial system has established that lack of financial ability cannot be considered as cheating.
3. Which measures should I take to protect myself against this type of harassment?
Every document and evidence demonstrating payment efforts should be safely stored and documented. Lawyers must be immediately consulted whenever criminal charges are filed against you. The quashing petition needs to be filed at the High Court.
4. Do banks have authority to confiscate my property or execute salary deductions without providing advanced notification?
Banks can implement asset seizures on secured loans directly through the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 that circumvent judicial procedures. All recovery attempts require businesses to deliver appropriate notifications beforehand.
5. How should I handle a legal notice my lender sends me?
Do not ignore it. Consult a lawyer immediately.
It is crucial to determine whether the matter at hand is classified as civil or criminal.
Civilians involved in a civil matter have both time and opportunity to resolve their dispute by settlement.
The situation requires immediate legal action whenever criminal charges emerge.
Final Thoughts: Is this Fair?
The illicit use of criminal law for loan collection purposes demands quick intervention from both judicial courts and legislative bodies. Banks possess authorized loan collection rights yet criminal cases remain different from being used as harassment methods.
All borrowers must understand their rights before taking swift legal steps whenever a debt collection implies harassment. Consult an attorney immediately if you experience this situation or someone in your network goes through it because you must fight against the case in court.
Share on
×