India's New Telecom Act, 2023: Implications for Privacy and Security


July 19, 2024
India's New Telecom Act, 2023: Implications for Privacy and Security
Listen to this article

Table of Contents

The new Telecom Act, 2023 introduced by the Indian Government brings a considerable change at the policy system level in the context of the country’s telecommunication industry. Unlike its sequential counterparts, this Act incorporates a phased approach to implementation. This strategy is more suitable because it proposes a more diverse and gradual way of changing the regulation, which the stakeholders need to face in the legal field. Some parts of the Act were implemented on July 5th, 2024, while others are still up for discussion and preparations for their implementation. 

Background

India's telecom law remained highly archaic for several decades by depending on the Indian Telegraph Act of 1885 and the Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act of 1933. These Acts were not suitable to the dynamism of the current telecommunication networks and internet-related services. Technological advancements such as Mobile Internet, OTT players, and advanced cyber threats require better and advanced legal solutions. The Telecom Act, 2023 has been introduced to improve this area by codifying the existing laws and then bringing new regulations for the new world that has developed in the digital era. 

Phased Implementation

It also differs from the previous Acts such as the Telecom Act, 2023 in that the changes made are not implemented immediately. This means that some of the elements take time to come into force to allow stakeholders time to adjust to the new regulations. Particular Sections of the Act commenced on the 5th of July, 2024 while the rest of the Sections remain to be enacted at a future date. Such an approach can be attributed to the phased implementation of the Act with the possibilities of future reviews depending on the reception and new issues experienced. 

Key Provisions of the New Telecom Act, 2023

Expanded Government Powers

  • Interception and Network Control: In the Act, under Section 20(2), the Government can legally intercept messages and even seize control of the telecom networks for a limited period for emergent and public safety reasons. This provision has been a source of controversy because of the probability of the Government abusing it and extending its authority over citizens. 
  • Definition of Telecommunication: The Act widely defines telecommunication as including Internet messaging services. This could involve messaging that is encrypted, however, the Government has stated that some of the OTT services might be exempted. 

Right of Way and Spam Regulations

  • Simplified Infrastructure Deployment: The Act simplifies right-of-way regulations, and lets authorities approve telecom works’ installation on a private piece of land despite the owner’s unwillingness. That is to minimize any delays in the development of infrastructures towards increasing productive efficiency. 
  • Curbing Spam: The Act sets the user’s permission required for the reception of commercial informational messages and creates Do Not Disturb registries that provide users with more powers over unwanted informational messages. 

SIM Ownership Limits

  • Reduced SIM Cards per User: The Act allows a person to possess a maximum of nine SIM cards with varying restrictions in some regions. This is to help overcome fraudulent activities and abuse of mobile linkages. 

Uncertainties Remain

  • OTT Regulation Ambiguity: Unfair competition has called for easy regulation of platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram under the Act but their applicability to the Act could have been clearer. There is a need for the Government to clarify whether these services are included in the interception powers. 
  • User Verification Delay: Telecom companies have to wait before verifying their users’ biometrics; the move may correspond with the passing of the Digital India Bill. 

Impact

The Telecom Act has a multifaceted impact:

  • Enhanced Security: The government gets enhanced control over the network structures and messages which in certain cases can enhance the safety of the country and its residents. 
  • Privacy Concerns: The general increase in power for Government oversight of these platforms and the censorship of definite OTT businesses have brought up issues of privacy violation. 
  • Streamlined Infrastructure Development: Uncategorized right-of-way regulations can enhance the speed with which infrastructure is put in place, and this could enhance network accessibility. 
  • Spam Reduction: Anti-spam actions can help enhance the situation and save customers from unneeded messages. 
  • Uncertainties Remain: Lack of certainty for both users and service providers which is brought by the absence of definite regulation concerning OTT and the future requirements for user verification.

Key Changes Enforced from July 5th, 2024

The following Sections of the Telecom Act, 2023, were implemented on July 5th, 2024:

Sections 1 & 2: Establishing the Foundation 

These Sections establish the conceptual frameworks for the Act with well-defined terms such as “telecommunication service”, “telecommunication network”, and “authorized entity”. Such definitions’ diffusion is necessary to eliminate confusion and promote a focused interpretation of Sections under the Act. 

Sections 10-30: a wide range of regulations 

These Sections encompass a wide range of regulations, including:

  • Standards and Public Safety: These Sections set the various specifications for the telecommunication equipment and services that make up the much-needed networks to support billions of people’s needs for reliable, secure, and seamless exchange of information. 
  • National Security and Network Protection: The provisions contain steps to protect telecommunication networks from cyber risks, spying, and any illegitimate actions in a bid to secure a country’s security on the digital front. 
  • Digital Bharat Nidhi: Reducing the World’s Digital Divide, this policy replaces the Universal Service Obligation Fund. The recently formed Digital Bharat Nidhi has the mandate of financing the development of telecom networks in the unserved regions to enhance the chances of mainstream technological connectivity in all parts of the country. 

Sections 42 to 44: Support of innovation and technology development 

These Sections cover innovative and technological advancements in the telecommunications industry. These provisions may compel the establishment of regulatory sandboxes that contain environments in which the new technologies and the corresponding services can be tried out before they are let into the open market. These assist in cultivating more competition and innovation concerning telecommunication structures and services. 

Section 46 & 47: User Protection (With Reservation) 

These Sections cover the protection of the end-users and offer ways that can be used to secure the users and their rights to privacy. That being said, there are still doubts as to whether the specific execution of the Act might be inconsistent with the provision of privacies, especially concerning Internet-based messaging services. 

Sections: 50 to 58: Prevention by Penalties 

The provisions under these Sections focus on the offenses and penalties as a result of violation of the given Act. When criminal activities are committed a predefined penalty is set for such illegal activities within the telecommunications sector such as unauthorized access to the networks or even the use of SIM cards that are fraudulent the given practices are discouraged to encourage security. 

Section 61 & 62: Other States’ Provisions to Enhance Effective Implementation 

These Sections consist of provisions that have not been addressed anywhere in the Act but are closely related to the Act’s purpose; this includes provisions for the formation of complaints handling bodies, to handle cases of disagreements arising from the assessment of the Act. 

Impact of Enforced Provisions

The enforcement of these Sections brings about several immediate changes:

  • Clearer Definitions: This explanation reveals that the terminology of the Act is now clear after avoiding confusion between the parties such as government agencies, telecommunication service providers, and users. 
  • Focus on Standards and Security: The focus on standards and network security guarantees the quality of the provided services, global threat prevention, and data security. This results in a more secure and reliable telecommunication environment in the country. 
  • Digital Bharat Nidhi: The new fund could help advance infrastructures, particularly in distant locations which would then improve the capacity for digitization. This closes the gap and ensures that people and various groups obtain communication gadgets and other online services.

Unanswered Questions and Concerns

Despite the implemented parts of the Telecom Act, 2023, some of its provisions offer new meanings and have some advantages, the essential provisions remain non-implemented at the moment. These include: 

Interception and Network Control: A Balancing Act? (Section 20(2)) 

Thus, the interception power in Section 20(2) can be used in emergency situations and cases that relate to threats to public safety. Being an offence knocking and trespassing are related to scenarios that might pose a menace to the security of the country, public order, or safety. 

Right of Way Rules: Optimising the Infrastructure Roll-out Process ( uncertain timings) 

While some parts of the right-of-way rules are implemented, the whole set of rules defining the procedures for the placement of infrastructure on private property has not been fully elaborated. This also relates to the cases where a landowner will not consent to hosting the installation. There is a need for well-defined and easily understandable policies to govern the augmentation of infrastructure without infringing on the owners’ rights to property. 

Mandatory User Verification: Digital India Bill and Its Consequences (No Specific Timeframe) 

The Act forbids the user verification obligatory for telecom companies and might wait for the Digital India Bill. The effect on user security and/or verification protocols is yet to be determined. Questions with respect to the most effective and private ways of accessing and verifying the identity of its users will be critical in this regard. 

Critical analysis

The Telecom Act, 2023, though brings some positivity like the definitions are made and security is an aspect, a negative picture in total is depicted. This is because the powers granted to the government to intercept communication under Section 20(2) of the Act are amorphous and can easily be abused and this has; Among other things made the Act questionable. The proportion of private life to the national security issue is something that is required to find the golden mean. Furthermore, instability in the actualization of the Right of Way rules partially contributes to the system’s unpredictability regarding infrastructure construction projects on private property. Last but not least, the lack of obligatory user identification raises questions on the protection of users and procedures of the identification process that could be related to the approaching Digital India Bill. As for the Act to further guard the Indian digital ecosystem, further measures of precaution together with distinct protection measures, constant communication, and transparent policy-making should be exercised to avoid negative consequences and to provide an optimal privacy-preserving environment for its inhabitants. 

Conclusion 

Some sections of the Telecom Act of 2023 entail the initiation of a revolutionary process in the progression of telecommunications in India. Even though the imposed provisions make the companies more certain, urged to innovate, and address user protection (with concerns), the questions related to interception powers, user verification, and OTT platform remain unanswered, which requires more attention. While the remaining portions are gradually being implemented, a comprehensive evaluation must be conducted to evaluate the Act’s effects on national security, user confidentiality, and the general well-being of the telecommunications industry. However, India will need to tread this line with a lot of caution and balance the positives and negatives of the Act to create a dynamic and safe environment for the citizens who are empowered through the digital willingly under the provisions of their rights and freedom. 

FAQs

What does it mean for a user of a mobile phone under the Act? 

The Act may imply getting a more secure and dependable mobile phone connection. It may also mean that you will have more say on the kind of adverts that will be brought to your attention. However, some critics have alleged that there is a possibility that the Act may be exploited to violate the privacy of users. 

Will the Act make it more difficult to get a mobile phone connection?

The Act does not in any way make it more difficult to obtain connections to mobile phones. However, it does set a maximum number regarding the number of SIM cards a person can own (Up to 9)

What is Digital Bharat Nidhi? 

The Digital Bharat Nidhi is a new fund that is put in place for the development of telecom networks in unserved regions. This implies that people in India will be able to access mobile phone and internet services therefore increasing traffic. 

How could I therefore be affected by Right of Way? 

The Right of Way provisions might facilitate the construction of new cell towers and internet cables in your locality. This can foster improved coverage of networks and equally improved internet speed. 

Do landowners have the right to refuse the Right of Way? 

The Act says authorities can give their okay to such installations even when the owners are against it in some circumstances. Nevertheless, the details regarding the compensation and procedures aimed at its implementation remain elaborated to the extent.

Written By:
Vidhikarya

Vidhikarya


Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markCritical and persistent issue with my Honda WRV IDTEC Diesel 1 Response(s)
Dear Client, From the prolonged content of your query, it appears you are extremely aggrieved with the service of the service provider and decided to move the Court for relief. On detection of defects in the product, post-purchase is termed and defined under Sec.2(34) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 as "Product Liability" which means the responsibility of a product manufacturer or product seller/service centre, to compensate for any harm caused to the consumer/customer by such defective product manufactured or sold or for a deficiency in services relating thereto. Chapter VI, Section 82 to Section 87 of the Consumer Protection Act deals with product liability and So, in the given scenario, serving a strong legal notice to both Service Provider and the product manufacturer, you can file a complaint against them over alleged deficiency in service and unfair trade practices before the District Consumer Commission under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 claiming replacement of the vehicle or refund of the cost of the vehicle including the expenses incurred towards repairing/servicing along with compensation for harassment and cost of litigation. As per Section 69 of the CPA, the complaint should be filed within two years from the date of the cause of action. Since you have been facing a deficiency in service since 2017 up to now, your claim is now barred by limitation. So, you have to file a petition seeking condonation of delay on the grounds of continued cause of action along with your complaint petition and lead the evidence to justify your claim before the Commission. If required, hire the service of an experienced Advocate handling consumer cases to navigate the issue in the right way.
question markComplaint against Disciplinary Authority 3 Response(s)
Dear Madam, Your query is too lengthy which cannot be read within 5 minutes. Please give brief history and two or three questions.
question markApplication under Section 75 of the Indian Evidence Act 2023 1 Response(s)
Dear Client, Both under the Right to Information Act, 2005 and Section 76 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872(now Section 75 of BSA, 2023), you can apply before the Court/Public Authority seeking information/documents following the procedure of application. While the RTI Act provides a time-bound response to an application up to the First Appellate Authority, there is no provision as such under Section 76 of the Indian Evidence Act. The Registrar appointed under the Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969 is the competent authority to register the reported birth and death and issue a certificate of birth or death to the applicant and is the sole custodian of all records related to births and deaths of his jurisdiction. According to Section 76 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872(now Section 75 of BSA, 2023), every public officer having the custody of a public document, which any person has a right to inspect, shall give that person on demand a copy of it on payment of the legal fees thereof, together with a certificate written at the foot of such copy that it is a true copy of such document or part thereof, as the case may be, and such certificate shall be dated and subscribed by such officer with his name and his official title and shall be sealed, whenever such officer is authorized by law to make use of a seal; and such copies so certified shall be called certified copies. You can apply for certified copies of public documents like orders, judgments, order sheets, and even entries in certain registers and FIRs that are in the custody of the Court or the Public Authority. So, you may make an application addressing "To, The Registrar, under the D & B Act, 1969, IN THE OFFICE OF THE BIHAR SHARIF MUNICIPAL CORPORATION for the issue of CC of birth certificate paying fees as asked for by the authority post verification of your application and availability of documents in the office of the public authority.
question markHouse owner issues 1 Response(s)
Dear Sir, Thinking on behalf of landlord he was prevented from getting another tenant as such he may charge penalty of 5% to 10% on the advance amount paid by you and return back your advance amount. You may approach the Police.
question markRental issues please respond 1 Response(s)
Dear Sir, He has every right to deduct 5-10% out of the advance amount paid by you since he lost the chance to get another tenant since you have accepted to become his tenant.
Our Expert Lawyers in Cyber, Internet, Information Technology Telecommunication