The new Telecom Act, 2023 introduced by the Indian Government brings a considerable change at the policy system level in the context of the country’s telecommunication industry. Unlike its sequential counterparts, this Act incorporates a phased approach to implementation. This strategy is more suitable because it proposes a more diverse and gradual way of changing the regulation, which the stakeholders need to face in the legal field. Some parts of the Act were implemented on July 5th, 2024, while others are still up for discussion and preparations for their implementation.
India's telecom law remained highly archaic for several decades by depending on the Indian Telegraph Act of 1885 and the Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act of 1933. These Acts were not suitable to the dynamism of the current telecommunication networks and internet-related services. Technological advancements such as Mobile Internet, OTT players, and advanced cyber threats require better and advanced legal solutions. The Telecom Act, 2023 has been introduced to improve this area by codifying the existing laws and then bringing new regulations for the new world that has developed in the digital era.
It also differs from the previous Acts such as the Telecom Act, 2023 in that the changes made are not implemented immediately. This means that some of the elements take time to come into force to allow stakeholders time to adjust to the new regulations. Particular Sections of the Act commenced on the 5th of July, 2024 while the rest of the Sections remain to be enacted at a future date. Such an approach can be attributed to the phased implementation of the Act with the possibilities of future reviews depending on the reception and new issues experienced.
The Telecom Act has a multifaceted impact:
The following Sections of the Telecom Act, 2023, were implemented on July 5th, 2024:
These Sections establish the conceptual frameworks for the Act with well-defined terms such as “telecommunication service”, “telecommunication network”, and “authorized entity”. Such definitions’ diffusion is necessary to eliminate confusion and promote a focused interpretation of Sections under the Act.
These Sections encompass a wide range of regulations, including:
These Sections cover innovative and technological advancements in the telecommunications industry. These provisions may compel the establishment of regulatory sandboxes that contain environments in which the new technologies and the corresponding services can be tried out before they are let into the open market. These assist in cultivating more competition and innovation concerning telecommunication structures and services.
These Sections cover the protection of the end-users and offer ways that can be used to secure the users and their rights to privacy. That being said, there are still doubts as to whether the specific execution of the Act might be inconsistent with the provision of privacies, especially concerning Internet-based messaging services.
The provisions under these Sections focus on the offenses and penalties as a result of violation of the given Act. When criminal activities are committed a predefined penalty is set for such illegal activities within the telecommunications sector such as unauthorized access to the networks or even the use of SIM cards that are fraudulent the given practices are discouraged to encourage security.
These Sections consist of provisions that have not been addressed anywhere in the Act but are closely related to the Act’s purpose; this includes provisions for the formation of complaints handling bodies, to handle cases of disagreements arising from the assessment of the Act.
The enforcement of these Sections brings about several immediate changes:
Despite the implemented parts of the Telecom Act, 2023, some of its provisions offer new meanings and have some advantages, the essential provisions remain non-implemented at the moment. These include:
Thus, the interception power in Section 20(2) can be used in emergency situations and cases that relate to threats to public safety. Being an offence knocking and trespassing are related to scenarios that might pose a menace to the security of the country, public order, or safety.
While some parts of the right-of-way rules are implemented, the whole set of rules defining the procedures for the placement of infrastructure on private property has not been fully elaborated. This also relates to the cases where a landowner will not consent to hosting the installation. There is a need for well-defined and easily understandable policies to govern the augmentation of infrastructure without infringing on the owners’ rights to property.
The Act forbids the user verification obligatory for telecom companies and might wait for the Digital India Bill. The effect on user security and/or verification protocols is yet to be determined. Questions with respect to the most effective and private ways of accessing and verifying the identity of its users will be critical in this regard.
The Telecom Act, 2023, though brings some positivity like the definitions are made and security is an aspect, a negative picture in total is depicted. This is because the powers granted to the government to intercept communication under Section 20(2) of the Act are amorphous and can easily be abused and this has; Among other things made the Act questionable. The proportion of private life to the national security issue is something that is required to find the golden mean. Furthermore, instability in the actualization of the Right of Way rules partially contributes to the system’s unpredictability regarding infrastructure construction projects on private property. Last but not least, the lack of obligatory user identification raises questions on the protection of users and procedures of the identification process that could be related to the approaching Digital India Bill. As for the Act to further guard the Indian digital ecosystem, further measures of precaution together with distinct protection measures, constant communication, and transparent policy-making should be exercised to avoid negative consequences and to provide an optimal privacy-preserving environment for its inhabitants.
Some sections of the Telecom Act of 2023 entail the initiation of a revolutionary process in the progression of telecommunications in India. Even though the imposed provisions make the companies more certain, urged to innovate, and address user protection (with concerns), the questions related to interception powers, user verification, and OTT platform remain unanswered, which requires more attention. While the remaining portions are gradually being implemented, a comprehensive evaluation must be conducted to evaluate the Act’s effects on national security, user confidentiality, and the general well-being of the telecommunications industry. However, India will need to tread this line with a lot of caution and balance the positives and negatives of the Act to create a dynamic and safe environment for the citizens who are empowered through the digital willingly under the provisions of their rights and freedom.
The Act may imply getting a more secure and dependable mobile phone connection. It may also mean that you will have more say on the kind of adverts that will be brought to your attention. However, some critics have alleged that there is a possibility that the Act may be exploited to violate the privacy of users.
The Act does not in any way make it more difficult to obtain connections to mobile phones. However, it does set a maximum number regarding the number of SIM cards a person can own (Up to 9)
The Digital Bharat Nidhi is a new fund that is put in place for the development of telecom networks in unserved regions. This implies that people in India will be able to access mobile phone and internet services therefore increasing traffic.
The Right of Way provisions might facilitate the construction of new cell towers and internet cables in your locality. This can foster improved coverage of networks and equally improved internet speed.
The Act says authorities can give their okay to such installations even when the owners are against it in some circumstances. Nevertheless, the details regarding the compensation and procedures aimed at its implementation remain elaborated to the extent.