Juvenile Justice In India: Status & Challenges


Posted On : April 21, 2017
Listen to this article

Table of Contents

Over the last two decades, researchers have made significant discoveries about the causes and origins of delinquency. Specifically, they have learned a great deal about adolescent development and its relationship to decision-making, about multiple factors that contribute to delinquency, and about the processes and contexts associated with the course of delinquent careers. Over the same period, public officials have made sweeping jurisprudential, jurisdictional, and procedural changes in our juvenile justice systems. The first half of the text focuses on Concept of Juvenile Justice, juvenile crime and examines trends and patterns in delinquency and victimization, explores causes of delinquency—at the individual, micro-social, and macro-social levels, and from natural and social science perspectives—and their implications for structuring a youth justice system. The second half of the book concentrates on juvenile justice and examines a range of issues—including the historical origins( An Evaluation of Juvenile Justice System in India ), Discriminatory application of Juvenile Justice and re-invention of the juvenile court; juvenile offenders' mental health status and considerations of trial competence and culpability; intake, diversion, detention, and juvenile courts; and transfer/waiver strategies—and considers how the juvenile justice system itself influences delinquency. Almost all the countries have developed juvenile justice system to deal with their young offenders. In India scene for the children has changed a lot and their problems and related issues have been given attention and are being discussed at various forums. The question of providing proper protection and care to the children of such a big number is a big challenge. A good number of our children on account of socio-economic reasons have adding themselves in the list of delinquent child. A report of UNICEF in 2005 on the state of world's children under the title “Child under Threat”, speaking regarding India, mentioned that millions of Indian children are equally deprived their right of survival, health, nutrition, education and safe drinking water. This is what is happening to the most of the young children who if properly taken care of, would shine the future of the country. The cache statements “Children are supremely important national asset”[2] and the greatest gift of humanity[3]. On account of their venerability and dependence they can be exploited, ill-treated and directed into undesirable channels by anti-social element in the community. The state has to difference of affording proper care and protection to children at all times.[4] The approach of the Supreme Court towards juvenile has been very liberal. It was way back in 1977, when Supreme Court in a case[5] held that penalty of death should not be imposed on a person below 18 years of age. Borstal Acts and Reformatory Schools Acts had the children guilty of offence punishable with death or life imprisonment in their focus. Though the judicial opinion was not uniform on the issue when these Acts could apply to such children[6]. Some conclusion and suggestions have been drawn on the basis of this research study. The researcher has put his conclusion and suggestions in his research that Parliament has enacted so many Acts for the welfare of the juveniles but these Acts have not been implemented whole-heartedly with sincere intentions on account of which juveniles in India are still facing many problems. Apart from it, certain suggestions for better implementation of the Act have also been made out at the end of the study. [1]BBA.LL.B 1st year Presidency University, Bangalore. [2] Laxmikant Pandey vs. Union of India, 1984(2) SC 244, 249 [3] Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs. Union of India (1997) 10 SC 551-553 [4] See, the Object and Reasons Appended to the Children Act, 1960 [5] Raisul v State of UP, AIR 1977 (SC) 1822. [6] AIR 1965 (MP) 122, AIR 1937 (Nag) to 74 (DB) 1968 Crl.L J. 1178,1961, Mad. L J (Crl.) 705  
Written By:
aman Khandelwal

aman Khandelwal


Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markRegarding juvinile justice 1 Response(s)
Dear Client, Section 19 of THE JUVENILE JUSTICE (CARE AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN) ACT, 2015 deals with the powers of the Children's Court. As per sub-section (1)(ii) of section 19 of the Act, after the receipt of the preliminary assessment from the Juvenile Justice Board under section 15 of the Act, the Children's Court may decide that there is no need for trial of the child as an adult and may conduct an inquiry as a Board and pass appropriate orders following the provisions of section 18 of the Act Sec 24 of the Act deals with the removal of disqualification on the findings of an offense. As per Sub-Section (2) of Sec.24, the Board shall make an order directing the Police, or the Children's Court to its registry that the relevant records of such conviction shall be destroyed after the expiry of the period of appeal or, as the case may be, a reasonable period as may be prescribed, Provided that in case of a heinous offense where the child is found to be in conflict with law under clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 19, the relevant records of conviction of such child shall be retained by the Children's Court. Given the above provision of the relevant Act, you may approach the Juvenile Justice Board or Children's Court through an Interlocutory Application(IA) praying for the deletion of records of conviction. In case your application deserves merit, the Court may allow your appeal and pass an order accordingly.
question markNext step 2 Response(s)
What is your question. Documents need to be seen for fair and substantial advice. Properties are auctioned to satisfy the decree if division of the property is not possible or feasible. However some contentions remain open always as per the parties to the suit
question markRegarding juvenile justice 1 Response(s)
Dear Client, In many jurisdictions, laws regarding juveniles are different from those for adults. If a 17-year-old spreads misinformation and causes defamation, the legal consequences would depend on the specific laws of the jurisdiction. Juveniles may be subject to the juvenile justice system, which typically focuses on rehabilitation rather than punishment. Punishments may include counseling, community service, or other measures aimed at correcting behavior. If the misinformation and defamation are spread using the mobile number of an adult, both the juvenile and the adult may be held accountable. The adult could be implicated for allowing or facilitating the misuse of their mobile number, depending on the circumstances. It's essential to consult with legal authorities or seek advice from a legal professional familiar with local laws to understand the specific implications in the relevant jurisdiction. Thankyou
question markNRI Child Status in India 2 Response(s)
As per law father is the natural guardian of child above 5 years. Fluency in English does not mean that person is intelligent and sane. Many people like from china, Japan, USSR, Israel etc uses translator to communicate. 1. Since child is born in India hence till 18 he can have be Indian citizen or be Australian citizen and on attaining 18 child shall have option to choose citizenship of either country. 2. Yes. 3. Yes. On attaining 18 years he shall have option to choose citizenship of either country. 4. You cannot stop a person from filing case but you have right to defend and also to take precautions to save yourself from such frivolous cases.
question markPIL 2 Response(s)
The letter that you wrote to the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India, has been converted in to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). Your letter has been converted into a PIL since the Supreme Court (SC) must have felt that in the absence of a presiding member at the District Forum a lot of aggrieved persons must be facing undue hardship. As such the SC must have converted your letter into a PIL so that necessary directions may be given to the State Government regarding the appointment of members of the District Forum and for other reasons regarding the working of the forum. Your Letter has been converted to a PIL by the Hon'ble Chief Justice. It being under process means that you will be communicated about a date where you will have to appear either in person or through a counsel to take the matter forward. The bench comprising of the Chief Justice or any other Ld. Judge who will be on the PIL Roster will hear the matter but most likely it shall be the Hon'ble Chief Justice. The Supreme Court will hear you and the State Government and then proceed to take the necessary directions. It is unlikely that the Supreme Court will give you compensation at this stage since the court concerned for hearing your matter is the Consumer Forum and the Supreme Court cannot step in the shoes of the Consumer Forum and decide the matter. It can either give directions for transferring the petition or give directions regarding the appointment of members at the District Forum so that your petition may be heard there.