The Indian legal system for many years reflecting the colonial law has undergone a drastic change after the implementation of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNS’), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (hereinafter referred to as ‘BSA’) on and from the 1st of July, 2024. These new laws are therefore a deliberate attempt at shifting from what may be referred to as ‘Westernized’ criminal justice system back to a justice system that is more in sync with the Indian mind set and perception of justice. These and the subsequent benchmark changes represent such a shift of approach as the previous colonial framework are being replaced with the goal to better reflect the country’s intellectual legacy.
In the colonial context, the legal reform was primarily focusing on the punitive aspects of crimes rather than addressing the consequences of crimes for the victims and the wider communities. New laws, however, demonstrated the attempts to introduce restorative principles into the legislative process, which matches the Indian idea of ‘dharma.’ The term dharma is translated as righteous duty and emphasizes the need for the social order and compliance with the responsibilities. The BNS does the same through the provisions of compensation funds for the victims. Let’s consider a situation when crime not only destroys the life of a person, but also leaves a person with an economic problem. Such struggles are recognized by the system of victim compensation, which allows for subsequent compensation and thus reflects the concept of restoring order.
Additionally, the BNS also provides provisions regarding community service for some of the offences. It also acts as a punishment and gives the offender an opportunity to be useful to society. This rhymes with the doctrines of ‘sadhana’ chanted in most Indian tenets of beliefs. Hence, in performing acts of service, the offender can get a chance to make amends and possibly aid in the healing of the affected parties in the society. This approach brings out the feeling of “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” which refers to the world being one family and actions being interrelated in a manner that the effect of the action generated befalls on the entire community.
However it is even important to recognize the fact that having all these principles on paper does not end it either. The subsequent part of the work will outline obstacles that are yet to be overcome in order to realize these principles for their successful implementation.
While the principals such as dharma (righteous duty) and Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world is a family) often emerge as the focused principals when it comes to the new laws. But there is no doubt that ancient Indian philosophy provides a number of governance principles that interlink with these legislative changes:
Democracy and information laws are the types of laws that are linked with search for truth. This can be evidenced in aspects such as the Right to Information Acts that seeks to enable citizens get access to records of the government.
Measures relating to the exclusion of certain categories of people or the conservation of nature also correlate with this idea. Measures against domestic violence or measures against environmental damage likewise bear witness to this obligation to non-violence in a broad sense.
The regulations that seek to ensure that resources are fairly distributed are coherent with this concept. Practical examples of this principle can be progressive taxation or different welfare programmes can be also included in this classification.
Out of the three new laws that have been enacted to function in the Indian legal perspective, namely The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), the independence of India from the British legal system is embraced with the modern and ancient Indian philosophical system.
The major changes introduced by these new laws:
Some of the most radical changes are centered on the use of the retrospective justice concept. The BNS departs from an almost strictly retributive approach and serves the purpose of the rehabilitation of victims and communities. This is evident in several key provisions:
The new laws emphasize the role of the community in the operation of the justice system. This is reflected in several innovative provisions:
The new laws recognize the need to modernize and make the legal system faster and more efficient. This is reflected in the following changes:
New laws and amendments have given cognizance to new forms of criminal activity and the desirability for higher penalties for criminals. This is evident in the following changes:
As positive as the new laws appear in the given framework, a lot has to be said about the difficulties of their enforcement. The police custody time has been increased from 15 days to 90 days in certain cases which is still a matter of controversy as there are huge chances of its misuse and proper check and balances to prevent its misuse must be warranted.
The success of these reforms hinges on several key factors:
Existing concerns are not only limited to specific areas of the new laws; police custody extensions are one of the various interests. Here's a breakdown of some key criticisms:
Although the new criminal laws represent complex and profound ideas of a restorative, community justice system, the vision of such a scheme’s practice is not void of difficulties.
One of them is the matter of appropriate education and training of representatives of police services. Such provisions as victim communication and service delivery projects and handling depend on restorative justice and therefore police officers that will be charged with the implementation of the BNSS provisions will need to be trained in restorative justice. Some of the competencies mentioned include interpersonal skills, especially communication skills, enrolled training, and cultural sensitivity. Otherwise, the rather sensitive task of working with the victims and the offenders and helping them find common ground might be at risk.
The other important component is to put in place strong governance structures. More police powers provided to the BNSS demand tangible protection against the possible abuse. There is need to have independent complaint bodies that possess the authority to: In addition, awareness creation on the part of the populace on these reforms as well as the rights that the citizens have, shall be important in their implementation.
The process of moving toward having a legitimate framework that would mimic the philosophical and cultural structure of the nation of India goes on. The BNS, BNSS, and BSA are examples of passing such a milestone on this road. Nevertheless, it depends on the response of the policymakers, police, and the public at large in implementing or enforcing them. It is through these constant discussions and debates along with proper training for the police force and establishment of sincere efforts to follow the spirit of these reforms, that India can provide a legal structure that can heal and empower the societies and the nations in this part of the world and uphold Indian philosophical tenets.
The new criminal laws in India therefore represent a break point away from the crass colonial model to a system that is in tune with the Indian philosophy. But the path ahead does not propose to be easy and apparently it poses the greatest challenge which the world needs to bear in mind – a challenge associated with tireless efforts and commitment to restorative justice, community policing, and victimology that itself has a capability to broadly endorse the spirit of ‘dharma’ and ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam. ’
The efficacy of these reforms on the other hand depends on their implementation. Therefore adequate police training, sound mechanisms for supervision and monitoring, and law enforcement publicity crusades of these provisions are vital in order to yield the benefits of these laws to victims, communities and the justice system at large.
The challenges are there in most developmental processes hence can be expected on the road ahead. Some workers resist change hence a possibility of minor setbacks while implementing new procedures could be observed. However, there is always a possibility of misuse of a worker’s power hence; this aspect has to be monitored frequently. However the opportunity benefits can be clearly defined and quite substantial. An Indian inspired legal system, not only ensures a faster dispensation of justice; it also brings in the social responsibility factor and communal harmony.
The new criminal laws in the given texts are an expression of a new hope. If nurtured and cultivated with the principles of efficiency and culture this legal system can be fostered and maintained so that India and everyone in it, is the better for it; for a sound system does not necessarily hamper growth of a more sensitive and aware legal system that can better imbue the citizens of India.