New dimension: Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016


Posted On : April 27, 2017
Listen to this article

Table of Contents

In major direction pertaining to the implementation of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016, the Supreme Court today directed all states and Union Territories to ‘scrupulously’ follow the new law and the rules. “All states are asked to file compliance keeping in view provision of the 2016 Act. They must realize that under 2016 Act a responsibility is cast on the states. When the law makes a provision, it is the obligation for law enforcement to give effect to it scrupulously”, a bench headed by justice Dipak Misra said. The bench said the new rules reflected a sea change in the perception of the government on the critical issue. The apex court, which directed all states and union territories (UTs) to file reports regarding compliance with provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016, said the new statute operated in a broad spectrum to protect the rights of people with disabilities. Bringing into focus the plight of disabled people, the Supreme Court had earlier fumed at several states not filing responses as to steps taken to implement various provisions of the Disability Act. In April, the apex court had issued notices to the Centre and all states on a plea seeking periodic monitoring of the implementation of various provisions of the Disabilities Act. By now all the states had filed responses. An angry bench headed by justice Dipak Misra had in November last year told lawyers representing several states: ” We are giving last chance to all states to file their responses. In the event of further failure, strict action will be taken”. The plea states that a majority of citizens belonging to disabled category have not got any relief even two decades after the rules were passed. Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation, on whose petition the court has been issuing orders for the welfare of the differently-abled since 1998, had moved an application saying that unless there was an effective monitoring system on the lines of Vineet Narain judgment in which the SC is keeping a tab on investigation of various corruption cases and issuing periodic directions, the implementation of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, will merely remain on paper. Ambar Qamaruddin, the lawyer for the petitioner, had earlier pointed out that the court itself had last year observed that only the Centre, some states, and the UGC had satisfied it on the implementation of the rules. The court said the states and UTs must realize that under this Act, their responsibilities have increased and the executing authorities must give effect to it with quite a promptitude. The 2016 Act, as we find, is a sea change in the perception and exhibits a march forward look with regard to persons with disabilities and roles of state governments, local authorities, educational institutes, and companies are given there, a bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra said. The statute operates in a broad spectrum and the focus is to protect the rights and provide punishment for their violation. We think it apposite to direct all the states and UTs to file compliance reports keeping in view the provisions of the 2016 Act within 12 weeks hence, the bench said. SC which fixed the matter for next hearing on August 16, noted that the states and UTs should take immediate steps to comply with the requirements of the Act and file compliance reports. The steps taken in this regard (by the authorities) shall be concretely stated in the compliance report which is to be filed within the time stipulated, it said.   source: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. NO.10 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) NO.116 OF 1998        
Written By:
sneha majumder

sneha majumder


Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markHarrassment by the secretary of society. 2 Response(s)
Dear Sir, You may get issue a strong legal notice and also file complaint with higher Police officers and threaten to media and also file suit for permanent injunction restraining them from interfering into your private lives.
question markMeaning and implication of lood relationship 4 Response(s)
Sir, kindly consult with local property lawyer.
question markNature of Land recorded as agriculture in U.P.- UPZALR Act 2 Response(s)
Dear Sir, The above property is situated in a State other than Karnataka. It is better you go to any local advocate who is well versed with local laws.
question markFee waiver denial for disabled child 4 Response(s)
Hi, According to The Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016, every child with benchmark disability between the age group of 6 and 18 years shall have the right to free education and also entitled to 5% reservation in seats in Government and Government aided higher educational institutions for persons with benchmark disabilities. If proper action has not been taken even after you have filed complaint to the officials concerned, you can move to court and seek the remedy. You will get Justice. Please rate my answer Thank You