When It Became Legal To Log Off
France became a trailblazer in 2017 by enacting the Right to Disconnect as part of the El Khomri Labour Law, requiring companies, especially larger ones, to negotiate with unions to ensure employees are not pressured to be online after hours, helping combat digital burnout and protect work-life balance. The law requires firms with over 50 employees to negotiate agreements on out-of-hours communications. Following in the footsteps of France, Supriya Sule, Lok Sabha MP from the Nationalist Congress Party (Sharadchandra Pawar), introduced a private member’s bill in the lower house on December 5th 2025, seeking legal right for employees to ignore work-related calls and emails beyond office hours.
India Attempts To Strike Do Not Disturb
The proposed Act, known as the Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025, is a piece of legislation that has been put forward in Parliament to prevent employers from forcing their employees to respond to work-related electronic communication during times that do not fall within official working hours, even on weekends and during public holidays. To do this, the bill suggests the establishment of an employees’ welfare authority which would guard and enforce this right, in case it is formally recognised.
Attention to alarming workforce trends was raised, and Shashi Tharoor posted about it on X (formerly Twitter). He observed that over fifty per cent of the Indian labour force works over forty-nine hours per week, and that a sizeable majority of them report burnout. As an example of the devastating effect of an excessive work ethic on health and physical condition, Tharoor referred to the tragic death of a young professional, Anna Sebastian Perayil. In his opinion, the bill seeks to control the working hours, officially acknowledge the right to switch off, and establish effective redressal of grievances and mental health support systems to create a more sustainable and healthier working environment.
What Impact Do Hours Of Logging In Have
The Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025, is a proposed legislation in the form of a private member bill, which implies that it has been proposed by a legislator outside the executive, a Member of Parliament. Conversely, a minister presents legislation, which is a government bill. In India, the private members’ of the house bills have a poor success rate of passing into law and are most of the time shelved when the government expresses its stand.
The bill that was proposed by Sule has sparked a larger debate on the high expectations of the Indian corporate population, irrespective of whether it is passed or not. On its importance, the Managing Director and the CEO of Randstad India, Viswanath PS, referred to the bill as being more of a symbolic step in the development of the Indian workforce. In his view, the suggestion questions the established culture of 24/7 and calls organisations to shift the paradigm of the measurement of performance on time spent at work to the evaluation of the meaningful outputs and results.
Sharing the same view, Gulati stressed self-regulation in organisations. He indicated that accountability is more efficient in mature work cultures, whereby the employees are not only influenced to manage their own energy but also to monitor working hours, not to mention that they have the authority to blow the whistle in cases where professional boundaries are violated.
When The Office Came Home With Us
Not very recently, such concepts as video conferencing, e-commerce, electronic banking, and working remotely were considered to be part of science fiction. They are a part of our day-to-day lives- and they are expanding in reach and influence today. Of course, the place of work has changed with these technological changes. The formal office is no longer four-walled; rather, work has become mobile, flexible and can be accessed almost anywhere.
This change however, has come at a cost. Among the most urgent issues of modern working culture is the fact that boundaries between professional and personal lives are slowly being eroded. Work does not stop the moment employees leave the office with smartphones, laptops, and 24/7 connection. Several employees are subjected to working well after the working day is over, responding to e-mails, phone calls and messages.
In a way, workers can still be physically out of the office, yet they are still virtually attached to work. This brings a critical question: where is the line to be drawn? Where do the right to work by the employer, and the right to personal time, and privacy by the employee commence? With technology still redefining the nature of the work environment and our place of work, there has been a greater need to address this imbalance than ever.
Always Connected, Always Tired
It is becoming even more usual in contemporary workplaces to find managers calling or emailing employees during times that are not part of the planned working hours, such as late hours, weekends, and even during public holidays. Employees are not necessarily required to do so, but unknowingly, they are expected to be vigilant enough to the work-related messages even when they are playing with their families. This culture of omnipresence has become a significant factor in the declining employee welfare, which goes against mental and physical health. According to a study conducted by Barber and Jenkins, people who read work messages past 9 pm. have worse sleep quality and are less engaged at work the next day. By the end of 2020, the rates of psychological distress among employees had increased by almost half as compared to the 2017-2019 period, and all key industries had recorded an increase. The most frequent symptoms are anxiety disorders, depression, and work burnout. In Japan, the extreme effects of overwork are summed up in the idea of karoshi, which means death associated with too much work stress. In a good example, the death of a 31-year-old Japanese employee due to his cardiac arrest was reported to be a result of extreme exhaustion due to overworking. During her final month, she allegedly worked almost 159 hours of overtime and had only two days of leave.
Share:
Share on
×