90,000+ Legal Questions Answered
Complaint against ex girlfriend
4 years ago
Is it possible for a boy to Lodge a complaint against his ex girlfriend who has shared his messages and due to which the boy is in trouble now?
Sidhaarth
Responded 4 years ago
A.Details are missing. Consult with details.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Chitra Sundar
Responded 4 years ago
A.Kindly mention the nature of the messages and the trouble in which you are placed now. Without knowing the nature of messages, it is difficult to provide a suitable advice.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
A.Dear Sir,
Be understand that it is doubled edged sword. The police may cooperate with you if you bring influence on them otherwise they my listen to the girl and file a case against you Be wise in taking a decision before lodging complaint against her.. You may following tips which are applicable to you. Please give me Rank 5 if you feel my answer helped you
======================================================
Crucial Steps to Ending a Long-Term Relationship
1. Always be realistic in your relationship. | iStock.com.
2. Choose the right spot to break off the relationship. ...
3. Stay calm when talking to your partner. ...
4. Always be honest. ...
5. Stand by your decision. ...
6. Decide how you'll tell your friends and family about the breakup. ...
7. Plan out your next move. ...
8. Don't talk badly about your ex.
Live-in Relationship: Indian Scenario:
On 23.03.2010 the Hon’ble SC in Khushboos case opined that a man and woman living together without marriage cannot be construed as an offence. “When two adult people want to live together what is the offence. Does it amount to an offence? Living together is not an offence. It cannot be an offence,†a three judge bench of Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan, Deepak Verma and B S Chuhan observed. The court said even Lord Krishna and Radha lived together according to mythology.
Live in relations suffered a setback with the bar imposed by the Supreme Court in its recent judgment delivered on 17th May 2010 in a Family dispute in the matter of Bhaasthamata v R Vijeya Renganathan. The Supreme Court held that a child born out of a live-in relationship was not entitled to claim inheritance in Hindu ancestral coparcenary property. The dictum of the division bench comprising Dr B S Chavuhan and Swatanter Kumar, JJ appears to be a general law but its root of jurisdiction lie in the facts peculiar to this case. This ruling may not be accepted as a general law at all. It is only justified in this particular matter, but if applied to all live-in relations raising a presumption of marital bond; it would definitely result in gross miscarriage of justice. In S.P.S. Balasubramanyam v Suruttayan Andalli Padayachi & Ors. The Supreme Court allowed presumption of marriage u/s 114 of Evidence Act out of live-in relations and presumed that their children were legitimate. Hence, they are rightfully entitled to receive a share in ancestral property. In the instance case, Mariammal claim her brothe Muthu Reddiars property who died unmarried and intestate. Rengammal lived-in with Muthu and had children from that bond. After his death, she claimed inheritance. Earlier Rengammal had married Alagarasami Reddiars (who was alive) but they didn’t live together because of undissolved marriage between them. The trial Court did not accept her live-in claim. Her first appeal was dismissed. Subsequently, the Madras High Court held the judgment in favour of live-in partner.
In the cases prior to independence like A Dinohamy v Blahamy the Privy Council laid down a broad rule postulating that, where a man and a woman are proved to have lived together as a man and wife, the law will presume, unless the contrary be clearly proved, that they were living together in consequence of a valid marriage and not in a state of concubinage. After independence the first case that can be reviewed is Badri Prasad v Dy. Director of Consolidation wherein the Supreme Court recognized live-in relationship as valid marriage, putting a stop to questions raised by authorities on the 50 years of life in relationship of a couple.
Divorce
You can legally file a divorce and get legal dirvorce.
Be understand that it is doubled edged sword. The police may cooperate with you if you bring influence on them otherwise they my listen to the girl and file a case against you Be wise in taking a decision before lodging complaint against her.. You may following tips which are applicable to you. Please give me Rank 5 if you feel my answer helped you
======================================================
Crucial Steps to Ending a Long-Term Relationship
1. Always be realistic in your relationship. | iStock.com.
2. Choose the right spot to break off the relationship. ...
3. Stay calm when talking to your partner. ...
4. Always be honest. ...
5. Stand by your decision. ...
6. Decide how you'll tell your friends and family about the breakup. ...
7. Plan out your next move. ...
8. Don't talk badly about your ex.
Live-in Relationship: Indian Scenario:
On 23.03.2010 the Hon’ble SC in Khushboos case opined that a man and woman living together without marriage cannot be construed as an offence. “When two adult people want to live together what is the offence. Does it amount to an offence? Living together is not an offence. It cannot be an offence,†a three judge bench of Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan, Deepak Verma and B S Chuhan observed. The court said even Lord Krishna and Radha lived together according to mythology.
Live in relations suffered a setback with the bar imposed by the Supreme Court in its recent judgment delivered on 17th May 2010 in a Family dispute in the matter of Bhaasthamata v R Vijeya Renganathan. The Supreme Court held that a child born out of a live-in relationship was not entitled to claim inheritance in Hindu ancestral coparcenary property. The dictum of the division bench comprising Dr B S Chavuhan and Swatanter Kumar, JJ appears to be a general law but its root of jurisdiction lie in the facts peculiar to this case. This ruling may not be accepted as a general law at all. It is only justified in this particular matter, but if applied to all live-in relations raising a presumption of marital bond; it would definitely result in gross miscarriage of justice. In S.P.S. Balasubramanyam v Suruttayan Andalli Padayachi & Ors. The Supreme Court allowed presumption of marriage u/s 114 of Evidence Act out of live-in relations and presumed that their children were legitimate. Hence, they are rightfully entitled to receive a share in ancestral property. In the instance case, Mariammal claim her brothe Muthu Reddiars property who died unmarried and intestate. Rengammal lived-in with Muthu and had children from that bond. After his death, she claimed inheritance. Earlier Rengammal had married Alagarasami Reddiars (who was alive) but they didn’t live together because of undissolved marriage between them. The trial Court did not accept her live-in claim. Her first appeal was dismissed. Subsequently, the Madras High Court held the judgment in favour of live-in partner.
In the cases prior to independence like A Dinohamy v Blahamy the Privy Council laid down a broad rule postulating that, where a man and a woman are proved to have lived together as a man and wife, the law will presume, unless the contrary be clearly proved, that they were living together in consequence of a valid marriage and not in a state of concubinage. After independence the first case that can be reviewed is Badri Prasad v Dy. Director of Consolidation wherein the Supreme Court recognized live-in relationship as valid marriage, putting a stop to questions raised by authorities on the 50 years of life in relationship of a couple.
Divorce
You can legally file a divorce and get legal dirvorce.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Ayantika Mondal @ Prime Legal
Responded 4 years ago
A.The explanation is too short to understand. what is the Time gap, nature of SMS, etc etc is very important in this case.
However, the boy can file a complaint U/s 506 of IPC- criminal intimidation
However, the boy can file a complaint U/s 506 of IPC- criminal intimidation
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Read Related Answers
Data Entery job fraud
Dear Client,
Most of the online data entry jobs are scams and are intended to extort money. Such attempts are made to intimidate you and lure money in the form of a penalty. In case of an unethical an...
Penalty for work from home job form filling
Dear Client
These kind of form filling jobs are basically scam and they trap innocent people to make money by threatening them. Since they are fraud hence they cannot take any legal action against you...
Money blackmailing
Dear Client,
In the given scenario, you need to file a complaint/FIR of blackmailing under Section 384 of IPC at the local police station and share whatever proof or evidence you have in support of y...
Mental harrasment
Dear Madam,
You have no role in the cause of accidental death of your boyfriend. You may get issue a legal notice to the family of your deceased boyfriend and threaten them to lodge defamation case an...
Cryptocurrency MLM and arrest
Trading of cryptocurrencies is allowed in India and a tax of 30% is charged on them. However, the status of legal tender is not given to Cryptocurrencies and they cannot be used for banking purposes....
Read Blogs on Cyber, Internet, Information Technology
Cyber, Internet, Information Technology Lawyers
Find Lawyers by Location
