Frozen bank account Frozen bank account

7 months ago

How to unfreeze my bank account that frozen by cybercrime

Legal Counsel Vidhikarya

Responded 7 months ago

View All Answers
A.Dear Client,
The National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal(NCCRP) is an initiative of the Government of India to facilitate victims/complainants to report cybercrime scams or complaints online and once a cyber crime scam is reported online to NCCRP, on the instruction of Cyber Crime Cell, investigating team started the routine process of investigation immediately freezing the suspected accounts of fraudsters and the victim's Bank account putting a lien on it. you can contact the Cyber Crime Investigation Cell (CCIC) a unit of the Indian police that is responsible for investigating cyber crimes. . A citizen can also report incidents of financial cyber fraud by following steps - Call the toll-free number 114448, Log on to https://cybercrime.gov.in to post a complaint, and Email your complaint to [email protected], You can also register a complaint of cybercrime at https://www.cybercrime.gov.in/. The length of time it takes to investigate a cybercrime can vary greatly depending on the complexity of the case, the resources are available to the investigators, and the cooperation of the victim. In general, cybercrime investigations can take anywhere from a few weeks to several months or even years. You can approach the Court for an expeditious investigation and for an interim order to unfreeze the bank account, but, in the absence of the final report of the investigating agency, your attempt may not yield any desired result in the matter.
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Anik

Responded 7 months ago

View All Answers
A.Dear client,
A court of the magistrate can be a competent legal forum to seek resolution for various legal matters, including those related to housing disputes, consumer grievances, and other civil issues.

TheCourt possesses extensive authority to facilitate the return of properties that have been seized by law enforcement agencies or other authorities to their rightful owners. These interim orders are typically issued within a period of thirty days from the date of filing such interim applications. Once the Court issues such orders, it becomes the legal obligation of the Police and other relevant authorities to promptly return the seized properties and vehicles to the individuals in whose favor these orders have been granted.
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Kishan Dutt Kalaskar

Responded 7 months ago

View All Answers
A.Dear Sir,
Dear Sir/Madam,
Under the following provisions the Hon’ble Magistrate Court having ample powers to unfreeze the Bank accounts. Further, the Hon’ble Court has vast powers to hand over the properties/vehicles seized by the Police and other authorities to the owners of the properties/vehicles. Such interim orders normally will be made within Thirty days of such interim application and on such orders the Police and other authorities are bound to hand over the properties/vehicles to the persons in whose favour such orders are passed.
Section 451 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973
451. Order for custody and disposal of property pending trial in certain cases. When any property is produced before any Criminal Court during any inquiry or trial, the Court may make such order as it thinks fit for the proper custody of such property pending the conclusion of the inquiry or trial, and, if the property is subject to speedy and natural decay, or if it is otherwise expedient so to do, the Court may, after recording such evidence as it thinks necessary, order it to be sold or otherwise disposed of. Explanation.- For the purposes of this section," property" includes-
(a) property of any kind or document which is produced before the Court or which is in its custody,
(b) any property regarding which an offence appears to have been committed or which appears to have been used for the commission of any offence.

457. Procedure by police upon seizure of property.
(1) Whenever the seizure of property by any police officer is reported to a Magistrate under the provisions of this Code, and such property is not produced before a Criminal Court during an inquiry or trial, the Magistrate may make such order as he thinks fit respecting the disposal of such property or the delivery of such property to the person entitled to the possession thereof, or if such person cannot be ascertained, respecting the custody and production of such property.
(2) If the person so entitled is known, the Magistrate may order the property to be delivered to him on such conditions (if any) as the Magistrate thinks fit and if such person is unknown, the Magistrate may detain it and shall, in such case, issue a proclamation specifying the articles of which such property consists, and requiring any person who may have a claim thereto, to appear before him and establish his claim within six months from the date of such proclamation.



Keeping seized vehicle in open air may harm it; petition for custody of vehicle under Section 457 CrPC allowed
•

Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anjuli Palo, J., addressed matter where petitioner was aggrieved by an impugned order passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge Itarsi in a criminal revision whereby the application under Section 457 CrPC, 1973 was dismissed.
The petitioner’s vehicle was seized by the police for crime under Sections 4, 6 and 9 of the M.P. GauvansVadhPratishedhAdhiniyam, 2004 and Section 11 of PashuKoortaAdhiniyam, 1960. This petition was filed under Section 482 of Code praying the release of petitioner’s vehicle by virtue of Section 457 of the Code on grounds that impugned orders seizing petitioner’s vehicle were illegal and arbitrary and the vehicle had been kept in open space which could damage the vehicle. Court relied on the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat, (2002) 10 SCC 290 where it was held that seized vehicle should be released as keeping it in open could cause harm to the vehicle. Therefore, Court set aside the impugned order as a result of which the vehicle’s interim custody was given to petitioner on furnishing of a personal bond. [Mohd.Irfan v. State of M.P.,2018 SCC OnLine MP 457, dated 03-08-2018]
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Read Related Answers

question iconLoan
Dear Client, A co-applicant/borrower is equally liable for repayment of the debt if the principal Borrower fails to repay it and if after exercising all the steps for recovery of debt against the Bor...
question iconCompassionate appointment
Dear Client, The SBI rules can not be breached. it could be the policy of the bank to not hire anyone. Please check with the rules and guidelines for heiring employees
question iconEducation Loan OTS
Dear Client, Try to go to the online portal of the said bank and complaint about grievance through the same. it is advisable to repay the loan amount within the stipulated time or you may face seizur...
question iconSbi account put on stop by cyber security
Dear Sir/Madam, Under the following provisions the Hon’ble Magistrate Court having ample powers to unfreeze the Bank accounts. Further, the Hon’ble Court has vast powers to hand over the properties/v...
question iconMy bank account got freezed
Dear Client, Once a cybercrime scam or fraudulent transaction is reported online to the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal(NCCRP), on the instruction of the Cyber Crime Cell, the investigating tea...