Free Legal Advice

Dear Client,
When a person issues a post-dated cheque against a promise or any refund of money refundable by her or him, and the cheque receiver holding the said cheque is free to present the same for encashment. If, on presentation, the cheque is dishonored or bounced for any reason, then the holder of the Cheque can file a criminal suit against the drawer of the cheque under section 138 of the N I Act, 1938, within three months from the date on which it was presented in the bank and dishonore

Dear Client,
The core documents needed for a cheque bounce case are the bounced cheque itself, the bank's return memo stating the cheque was dishonored, and the legal notice served on the person who issued the cheque. An advocate's involvement is usually for drafting the notice and representing the case in court, but their personal documents, like Aadhaar and photos, are not required. While an advocate's involvement can be helpful, it's important to remember that the case itself revolves around

Dear Client,
Yes, an ECS bounce case under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, can be transferred from one district to another under certain circumstances. Both under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code(CPC) and Section 407 of the Criminal Procedures Code(CR. PC) (now Section 447 of BNSS), the High Courts are empowered to transfer civil cases and criminal cases between subordinate courts within their jurisdiction. The High Court can exercise this power upon receipt of an application

Dear Client,
When a person issues a post-dated cheque against a promise or against any refund of money refundable by her or him, and the cheque receiver holding the said cheque is free to present the same for encashment. If, on presentation, the cheque is dishonored or bounced for any reason, then the holder of the Cheque can file a criminal suit against the drawer of the cheque under section 138 of the N I Act, 1938, within three months from the date on which it was presented in the bank and di

Dear Client,
Your query lacks information to respond. However, be informed that once the repayment of the loan stops or bounces for three consecutive occasions, the Bank/NBFC initiates a routine course of legal action for recovery of the loan from the borrower, marking the loan as a bad loan/NPA. A borrower of a loan is held personally liable for his or her debt for non-payment of the outstanding amount of the loan. If a suit for recovery of an outstanding loan from the borrower is filed by the

Dear Client,
Section 205 of the CrPC empowers a Magistrate, when issuing a summons, to dispense with the personal attendance of the accused and permit them to appear through a pleader or lawyer if he sees reason to do so. This provision applies only when a summons has been issued, not when a warrant has been issued. This provision grants the Magistrate discretion to determine if the accused's personal attendance is truly necessary. However, under Sub-Section 2 of Section 205 of the Cr. PC, even

Dear Sir,
Nobody will believe your words unless you lodge a complaint with Police if refused to receieve your complaint then immediately file a complaint and register a case of relevant offences by the Court thus you may get some relief if cheque bounce case is filed in future by such person.

Dear Sir,
You are lucky because he has not filed any cheque bounce case. Immediately, appear before the Court and file objections and written statement to see that no orders are passed which effects adversely on you. Simultaneously, you may get issue a legal notice to return back the remaining cheques and also check with Bankers and also give no payment on other cheques if presented by the said person or any other person.

Dear Sir,
The Civil Courts always act neutrally if the Defendant did not appear and becomes a fence sitter and watch the proceedings of the Court. You must appear before the Court otherwise orders on I.A.No.1 and 2 may be passed against you.

Dear Client,
The Court Fees based on the amount of cheque that bounced or dishonored are required for filing a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 1938. The court fee paid for initiating a cheque bounce case is typically non-refundable unless the case is settled through an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanism under Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) or settled in Lok Adalat, or if the court finds that the fees were paid erroneously or il