Track Your Request
Track Your Request
+91-7604047602 Our Team About Us Legal Blog Free Legal Advice Login
Vidhikarya Text Logo

Remedies against frivolous cases registered against students by the Police

Posted On : May 17, 2021
Remedies against frivolous cases registered against students by the Police
On many occasions, the Police have registered criminal cases against students, which hampers these students' careers and growth. They cause hardship to innocent students by affecting them emotionally and economically. They may be denied various opportunities on account of a criminal record and may be unable to build a future of their choice. This article lists out the remedies which can be availed by such students against false and frivolous FIRs that are registered by the Police.

It is always said that young students are the future of our country. Recently, there has been an increase in student activism where students, especially university going students, have started speaking up against malpractices committed by those around them. Popular resentment movements have been organized against measures taken by the government that are oppressive and arbitrary in the opinion of these students. There are multiple instances of movements by students against their college administrations as well. For example, many students organized mass protests and marches against the Jawaharlal Nehru University's decision to increase the hostel fees.With the rapidly rising activism, the Police have also simultaneously started taking actions against these demonstrations. Occurrences of students' arrest are not limited to their participation in these movements but also include situations where police officers use their authority to arrest or proceed against students for sitting in parks with their partners, smoke in public, consume alcohol, breaches of any curfew or lockdown imposed etc. While some of these actions are genuine and lawful, others abuse the police's power.

On many occasions, the Police have registered criminal cases against students, which hampers these students' careers and growth. They cause hardship to innocent students by affecting them emotionally and economically. They may be denied various opportunities on account of a criminal record and may be unable to build a future of their choice. This article lists out the remedies which can be availed by such students against false and frivolous FIRs that are registered by the Police.

How does a criminal record affect the students?

Criminal charges against any person can have a serious impact on their lives, especially in their professional careers, and must not be taken lightly. Many students wish to pursue higher studies abroad, and having any such criminal record drastically reduces their chances of getting into good universities. Criminal convictions negatively reflect upon any opportunities for higher education. As per the data collected by Criminal Watchdog, about 66.4% of university colleges require a declaration of an applicant's criminal records. In such cases, the odds of admission depend upon the gravity of the offence for which the applicant student has been charged or convicted. Generally speaking, charges of violent and sexual offences will lead to rejection, while persons accused of petty offences may be allowed depending upon the circumstances and the desired course. Since foreign studies are usually very expensive, most students seek financial aids through scholarships and loans; having a criminal record reduces the likelihood of obtaining any grants, aids or loans. Furthermore, as students seek housing facilities in or around campus, many people will be less interested in giving housing facility to students accused or convicted of a crime. Difficulties may even arise in the grant of visa application and other clearance by an immigration authority.

A student's past criminal record can impact them when they wish to stay within India. For instance, in the State of West Bengal and ors. v. Nazrul Islam, the Supreme Court has explicitly held that a person accused of any offence or against whom criminal charges have been levied is not eligible for appointment to a government job unless an order of acquittal has been passed. Thus, if any of the students falsely implicated by the Police wish to be in government service, they cannot do so unless they have been acquitted by the Court, which may take years. Some careers require the obtaining of a character fitness certificate before a person can enter into services. For example, law students are required to pass the character fitness test before obtaining their enrollment with the Bar Council. If medical students are charged with a misdemeanour or any offence related to drugs, they can be prohibited from practicing medicine altogether. Thus, having any false allegations levied or proved before a court of law can adversely impact a student's career.  

Instances of students' arrest by Police

In the past few years, the arrests of many students for participating in protests have come to light. In January 2020, the Hyderabad police registered a criminal case against six students of the University of Hyderabad for attempting to take out a rally. The students alleged that thePolice maltreated them, and a complaint was filed without any reason against them. Similarly, Commissioner KT Balakrishnasuomotu registered a case for the offence of sedition against students in Bangalore on the basis of a video clip of them holding placards that said 'free Kashmir'. The Delhi police booked some students of the JamiaMilliaIslamia University, including Umar Khalid, under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for allegedly conspiring the communal riots that took place during demonstrations against the Citizenship Amendment Act.

Police Clearance Certificate

Having criminal cases registered against oneself can also create a hindrance in obtaining a police clearance certificate (PCC). PCC is an official clearance certificate that is issued to a person by the Police. It is mandatory for immigration purposes, especially when one applies to obtain a visa in a foreign country. Such a visa is required when a student wishes to either study further or work in a country other than India. While giving a clearance, the Police scrutinize the record of the concerned individual, including instances of any criminal behaviour or allegations. Sometimes, a PCC is also made a requirement by individual firms or companies seeking to employ a national of a country other than their own. Thus, when students have, in their past, any association with criminal groups or instances of unethical behaviour or false criminal cases lodged against them, they will not be able to pursue a career abroad. 

While the Police has the authority to deny issuing a PCC on the ground of a pending criminal trial, an aggrieved student can file a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to direct the Police to issue a clearance certificate. In DrShahul Hameed Aboobacker v. Regional Passport Officer, it was held that a person could be granted a PCC only in the absence of any adverse information that renders them ineligible for the grant of travel facilities. The pendency of a criminal case is not a reason by itself to render the individual ineligible for grant of travel facilities, and one can obtain the permission of the Court before which the case is pending and then travel abroad. 

Remedies against false FIRs lodged by the Police

The police file fIRs only in cognizable cases, i.e. the cases that do not require an arrest warrant from the Magistrate. False lodging of cases by the Police can severely impact a student's life and career and is an outright abuse of power. It is used as a means to suppress the voices of those who are in an inferior position. Once a criminal complaint or an FIR is filed, there is less possibility that the individual will not be proceeded against. Nonetheless, in such situations, a student can take recourse to the following legal remedies:

1.    Quashing of FIR

Under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), the High Court has an inherent power to 'pass such orders as are necessary to prevent the abuse of process of the Court or secure the ends of justice'. Section 482 bestows the High Court with wide powers, and the Court has been approached on various occasions to quash frivolous FIRs and complaints filed against persons. The Section does not list out any well-defined grounds for quashing of FIR, but the Courts have evolved various considerations to be looked at in such situations. In Prashant Bharti v. NCT of Delhi, the Court held that in petitions for quashing of FIRs, the Court must ascertain whether the material presented by the accused person is sufficient to persuade any reasonable man to believe that the allegations are false or lack any factual basis. It should also be seen whether the continuance of a criminal case will serve the ends of justice or misuse the process of the Court.

In RP Kapur v. the State of Punjab, it was held by the Apex Court that a criminal proceeding could be quashed if any of the three situations are satisfied, namely, there is a legal bar against the endurance of the proceedings, or the contents of the FIR do not, prima facie, being out a criminal offence or when there is no evidence of the commission of such offences.

2.    A writ petition under Article 226

A falsely accused student can also invoke writ jurisdiction of the High Courts for quashing of false complaints or FIRs. A criminal writ petition can be filed before the High Court praying for dismissing the criminal charges. In Kapil Aggarwal v. Sanjay Sharma, the Supreme Court held that if an FIR has been filed only to harass the accused person or is an abuse of the process of Courts or it amounts to pressurizing the accused, the High Courts can exercise their powers under Article 226 of the Constitution or Section 482 of CrPC and quash the criminal proceedings.

3.    Filing a complaint under the Indian Penal Code

Lodging of a false FIR or criminal complaint is an offence under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Both Sections 182 and 211 of IPC deal with filing a false report, but Section 182 applies only to private persons for knowingly providing false information to a public servant, whereasSection 211 can be used to proceed against any person instituting false criminal proceedings against a person. The provision lays down that whoever, with a mala fide intention to cause injury to another institutes any criminal proceedings against them when they know that there is no legal or factual ground for such proceeding against the other, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend up to seven years and be liable to pay fine. 

Similarly, under Section 220 of IPC, any person having the legal authority to commit a person to trial or keep them in confinement, corruptly or maliciously keeps them in confinement or commits them for trial and acts contrary to law shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend up to seven years or fine or with both.


Filing of unnecessary and false cases against innocent persons amounts to gross injustice. It causes them to suffer mentally and constitutes a wasteful expenditure. If students are arbitrarily booked for exercising their rights or without any fault, they will be oppressed and denied opportunities to better their futures. This may result in the blocking of several career paths and may impose restrictions on their movement. The law provides remedies to students who are falsely implicated or without any reasonable grounds. It is imperative that abuse of power by the Police must be checked, and innocent persons must be protected. 


Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markRegarding anticipatory bail
The next process is pay the above said personal bond to the tune of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties, out of which one surety shall be from his native place, for the like sum The FIR & CAHRGESHEET IS REQUIRED for a detail study of this Criminal Case. & accordingly can guide you. If you realize my professional skills, the time & efforts put in by me needs to be truly appreciated, and then Please “CLICK MY LIKES/ THUMBS UP/GIFT” button shown below this reply format & also CLICK/ WRITE a “REVIEW” in 5 star as I have answered your query in detail. Hope this information is useful ADV. ANISH PALKAR (High Court)
question markRegarding ancipatin bail
Dear Sir, You have to discuss the matter in person with any other advocate practicing in criminal law and get clear your doubts basing upon conditions imposed in the anticipatory bail. Normally, police cannot do like that. I could have explained more if background is known to me. If background is made known in full then legal experts will be in position to understand correctly. Moreso, the background must be in brief. Please give me FIVE STAR if satisfied by my answers.
question markAnticipatory bail on the ground of parity.
Dear Sir, Parity cannot be the sole ground to apply for anticipatory bail. You must have to take some other ground before applying for bail in the court. Kindly rate the response. Thanks & Regards, Lucem Legal LLP
question markWhat is Bail
Dear Sir, Anticipatory bail judgements that can be used by husbands to secure their freedom and that of their beloved ones 16 June 2015 at 06:03Public Blog Links to Approx 30 cases where Anticipatory bails were granted. Short titles and notes added. Some cornerstone / classic cases included.  Whether you are a rookie husband who got married recently or a seasoned one with children, the moment police file an FIR, thanks to your ‘beloved’ wife’s complaints, your thoughts run towards bail. You start thinking, “…What can I use in my arguments for either Anticipatory bail or normal bail?..”  That’s when you start searching for judgements supporting grant of bail to husbands  Many such judgements are already blogged on Given below is small compilation of some of these judgements . Obviously there are many more cases which you can search and get in, but this entry / update is a good starting point. ************************************* Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. - 2 December, 2010 The Honourable Supreme Court of India beautifully highlights the law regarding bails as follows “….The law of bails dovetails two conflicting interests namely, on the one hand, the requirements of shielding the society from the hazards of those committing crimes and potentiality of repeating the same crime while on bail and on the other hand absolute adherence of the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence regarding presumption of innocence of an accused until he is found guilty and the sanctity of individual liberty…” I see this judgement being regularly used by other courts granting bail. This is becoming a “Mother of all judgements”, on anticipatory bail. In this case the liberty of the individual is balanced against the interests of the state, public safety etc and BAIL GRANTED to the accused ************************************* Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Etc vs State Of Punjab on 9 April, 1980 Cornerstone case on Anticipatory Bails. Supreme court of India This very detailed judgement almost lays down the law on Anticipatory bails and is affirmatively quoted in many bail orders that follow. This judgement decides the following key issues 1. The society has a vital stake in both of these interests namely, personal liberty and the investigational power of the police, ... The Court's task is how best to balance these interests ... 2. The High Court and the Court of Session should be left to exercise their jurisdiction under section 438 by a wise and careful use of their discretion which by their long training and experience, they are ideally suited to do. .... 3. The applicant must show that he has "reason to believe" that he may be arrested for a non-bailable offence. The use of the expression "reason to believe" shows that the belief that the applicant may be so arrested must be founded on reasonable grounds. The Hon court has also enunciated these Key principles about an Anticipatory bail. Namely :  ....Anticipatory bail is a device to secure the individual's liberty; it is neither a passport to the commission of crimes nor a shield against any and all kinds of accusation, likely or unlikely.  Secondly, if an application for anticipatory bail is made to the High Court or the Court of Session it must apply its own mind to the question and decide whether a case has been made out for granting such relief. It cannot leave the question for the decision of the Magistrate concerned under Section 437 of the Code, as and when an occasion arises. Such a course will defeat the very object of Section 438.  Thirdly, the filing of a First Information Report is not a condition precedent to the exercise of the power under Section 438. The imminence of a likely arrest founded on a reasonable belief can be shown to exist even if an F.I.R. is not yet filed.  Fourthly, anticipatory bail can be granted even after an F.I.R. is filed, so long as the applicant has not been arrested.  Fifthly, the provisions of Section 438 cannot be invoked after the arrest of the accused. The grant of "anticipatory bail" to an accused who is under arrest involves a contradiction in terms, ...... The Hon court goes on to add: 4. ... A "blanket order" of anticipatory bail should not generally be passed. 5. An order of bail can be passed under section 438(1) of the Code without notice to the Public Prosecutor. But notice should issue to the public prosecutor or the Government Advocate forthwith and the question of bail should be re-examined in the light of the respective contentions of the parties. This is an essential judgement to read and understand to know our rights as citizens seeking justice and liberty ************************************* Natturasu And Ors. vs The State on 8 January, 1998 AB be granted 4 entire trial & NOT limited time. AB can b granted b4, after FIR, even after cognizance. Classic Madras HC judgement on AB This is yet another Magnum Opus on Anticipatory bails, this time by a High court! In this case, the Hon Madras HC clarifies that • Normally, AB to be granted for entire trial period & NOT for a limited period time. • AB can be granted before or after FIR, even after cognizance. • Courts have wide powers but such powers are to be exercised carefully. • AB once granted should not be cancelled mechanically. The Hon. Madras HC answers many questions about Anticipatory Bails, namely  Normal rule NOT to limit the time of AB  AB can be granted before and IFR, after an FIR and even AFTER cognizance is taken as well.  No difference between Bail and Pre arrest bail except that normal bail is after custody The judgement goes to list several examples of when an AB can be granted. The judgement also analyses many other cases on AB by other Hon. High courts and the Apex court Excerpts from this judgement: Object of a bail! “….22. Thus, it is clear that the object of the bail is to secure the attendance of the accused at the trial. The accused person who enjoys freedom is in a much better position to look after his case and to properly defend himself in, the trial than if he is in custody. 23. In other words, as the Apex court holds, a presumed innocent person must have his freedom in the form of bail to enable him to establish his innocence at the trial.….” Bail once granted should NOT be cancelled in a mechanical manner “…65. In the light of the above, the anticipatory bail once granted must be held to be operative till the conclusion of trial, unless it is cancelled under Section 439, Cr.P.C. 66. ....However, unless there are very cogent and overwhelming circumstances, the bail or anticipatory bail cannot be easily cancelled. 67. Bail once granted should not be cancelled in a mechanical manner without considering whether any supervening circumstances…” No necessity to limit the time of an AB! ".. Constitutional Bench specifically observed, as referred earlier, that "the normal rule should be not to limit the; operation of the order in relation to the period of time….The High Court or the Court of Session, in an application for anticipatory bail, must apply its own mind and decide whether a case has been made out for granting such a relief. It cannot leave the question for the decision of the Magistrate under Section 437, Cr.P.C. as and when an occasion arises. Such a course will defeat the very object of Section 438 Cr.P.C. 82. Therefore, the observation by the Constitutional Bench would disclose the ratio that the High Court or the Court of Session normally exercises its judicial discretion granting anticipatory bail for entire period by not limiting the operation of the order in relation to a period of time. 83. As narrated earlier, the words contained in Sections 438(1) and 438(2), viz., "if it thinks fit" would empower the High Court or the Court of Session to make such a condition limiting to the period, considering the facts and circumstances of each case. But, it does not mean that the High Court or the Court of Session has no powers to grant absolute anticipatory bail…" Can AB be granted AFTER charge sheet is filed ? Answer is YES! "….86. It is not the view of the Apex Court that for the reason that the charge sheet had been filed, the Courts mentioned in Section 438 have become defunct to exercise the powers under the said provision. If that was the view of the Apex Court, it would not have approved the granting of interim anticipatory bail for a limited period……." Rate me Five Star*
question markAnoop
Dear Sir/ Madam Pending the application for anticipatory bail, the court may issue an interim order of bail as dealt with in Section 438(1) substituted by Act 25/2005. If the court rejects the accused's plea for interim bail or his application for anticipatory bail, the police are free to arrest him without a warrant. If you find this response useful then please rate me

Please enter the text



Send your queries to

[email protected]
Consult Human Rights Lawyers from your City!
Post Your Matter
Post Your Matter to connect with the Lawyer online
Call 7604047602 for any assistance
Our Team
Lawyer Login
Be a Partner

Download the Lawyers App on

Vidhikarya App on Android Platform
Contact Details
[email protected]
No. 2, First Floor, Subharaj
Plot No. CE/1/C/19, Premises No. 18-0208,
Action Area- 1, New Town