Hijab Case Judgment: Petition Dismissed

Posted On : March 15, 2022
Hijab Case Judgment: Petition Dismissed
Hijab case result is out and the Karnataka High Court has dismissed the petition of Muslim students to allow wearing of hijab in the educational institutes in Karnataka. The effect of this court order will lead students to choose among hijab scarf and their educational rights. The Indian hijab ban was in news highlights in the previous month. The Hijab row started with a government order followed by the College Development Committee which restricted wearing religious attires in the educational institutes upholding the ‘peace, harmony, law and order’. To know the backstage story of hijab case in Karnataka High Court decision, read the details below.
Listen to this article

Table of Contents

The Hijab case in Karnataka has gained national as well international attention due to the religious nature of the matter. It turned a hijab controversy through a government order and the matter was taken up to the judiciary. Here is what exactly happened in the hijab case judgment today. However, the petitioners still have the option of appeal against the hijab case judgment by Karnataka High Court.

Hijab Case Judgment Today

The most awaited hijab case in Karnataka High Court decision has been pronounced. The court formulated four issues/ questions to which answers were summarised based on arguments by both the parties, i.e. petitioners (Muslim girl students wearing hijab, etc.) and the respondents (Government representative and school-college representatives, etc.).

The Karnataka High Court has rejected the claim of hijab as an essential religious practice under Article 25 of the Constitution of India by the female Muslim students. While deciding whether prescription of school uniform could be violative of right to privacy or the right to freedom of expression, the bench held that uniform is only a reasonable restriction which can not be objected to by the students. Regarding the validity of the Government Order argued to be violative of rights under Article 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India, the Karnataka High Court held that the government has power to issue such orders. The requests for issuance of writ of Quo Warranto or a disciplinary action against the responsible authorities has been rejected by the court. Hence, the petition by Muslim girl students against the hijab ban has been dismissed by the Karnataka High Court.

Hijab in Islam

Islam is the world’s second largest religion prevalent in numerous countries. It is also reportedly one of the fastest growing religions in the world. Islam was founded by Prophet Mohammed who also proclaimed the holy Quran. Islam is known for various practices one of which is hijab scarf. Hijab in Islam is a cloth veil worn by some of the Muslim women to cover their head and chest.  

Hijab Controversy

Hijab is not a uniformly essential practice among all the Muslim women, but for those who follow the same, they do it religiously. The same was being followed by the Muslim girl students in Karnataka. The Udupi Hijab case came into existence as a controversial matter when a government was released restricting wearing any cloth/ attire in the educational institutes which may disturb peace, harmony, and law and order. The order delegated further decisive powers relating to school uniforms to the College Development Committees (CDC). Hijab row ignited when school girls wearing hijab were restricted from entering the educational institutes who protested against the school authorities. The fight between those Muslim students and the authorities became a nationwide controversy when some other student groups started their sloganeering wearing saffron scarfs proclaiming their Hindu status. 

Hijab Case in Karnataka High Court

The Muslim girl students brought the matter before Karnataka High Court for relief. They stated Hijab in Islam to be an essential practice and their right to freedom of religion as per the Constitution of India. The matter was initially taken up before Justice Krishna S. Dixit. Considering the seriousness of Hijab controversy and the nation-wide spread of hatred, the matter was referred before a larger three judge bench constituting Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court, Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi along with Justice Dixit and Justice J.M. Khazi. The Karnataka High Court bench patiently heard all the petitioners at first followed by the Advocate General of Karnataka. An interim order was also passed by the court to restrict wearing religious attires or flags in the classrooms till hijab case hearing concludes. While the Hijab case hearing was still ongoing, the Karnataka government issued another order whereby wearing of any religious attire including hijab scarf as well as saffron shawls was banned. Anyhow, the Karnataka hijab case went on for 11 days after which the hijab case in Karnataka High Court decision order was reserved. Hijab case judgment date was disclosed on Monday, March 14 that the Hijab judgment will be pronounced on Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 10:30 AM.

Hijab Case Judgment: End of the story?

The Karnataka High Court has decided the Udupi Hijab case as per the arguments held before the three judge bench by both the parties. However, the petitioner Muslim girl students still have the right to appeal against the hijab case in Karnataka High Court decision. And as per the previous scenario, it is expected that the matter will be discussed again, this time in the premises of the hon’ble Supreme Court of India.


Someone who has followed the hijab ban case religiously through the Karnataka High Court live proceedings virtually, they must be of the opinion that the court has missed out on the opportunity of bringing an end to the hijab controversy. It was an auspicious occasion whereby a South African judgment of an Indian girl’s essential Hindu cultural practice of wearing a nose pin could lay the foundation stone of allowing Hijab scarf through as was cited by Senior Advocate Devdutt Kamat. However, since the hijab case in Karnataka High Court decision is already proclaimed, the ball may soon come in the Supreme Court’s court.

Written By:


Kolkata | Delhi | Mumbai | Bangalore | Chennai | Pune | Vadodara | Nagpur | Goa | Anand

Recommended Free Legal Advices
Dear Sir, These kind of complex matters a lawyer would need all the documents and order sheets to tell anything. Better suggested that you take all the relevant papers and visit a local lawyer,s it with him and get it resolved. You may post an abridged version or straight question here to get a quick reply or advice from lawyers. For comprehensive answers to such kind of cases and matters better get in touch with a local lawyer.
question markservice matter- promotion 2 Response(s)
Until and unless a matter is admitted he opposite party is not called to the court. You can however be in talks with a lawyer who shall silently look into the case whether it is admitted or not. if the case is admitted then you shall need an advocate to appear on your behalf and defend your case. However, if the case is not admitted, then, you shall not require an advocate as because the SC itself shall not entertain this matter. Thanks
question markMutual divorce 6 Response(s)
Aap mutual divorce dakhil kar sakte hai. Or petition me sab conditions draft kar sakte hai. Children ke baare me likh sakte ho. Children hai to uski dekh rekh ka conditions to likhni padegi. Rahi baat ek must dhan rashi ki to aap usko us din de jis din court dono paksho ke bayan likh le or file ko order ke liye fix kar de. Advocate nhi sun raha hai to aap change kar sakte hai. Ya bar Association ko complaint kar sakte ho. Ki advocate sahi guide nhi kar raha h.
question markChild maintenance 4 Response(s)
Dear Sir, You just postpone all such agreements and they must feel that they never get alimony or maintenance.
question markBanking 1 Response(s)
see it is clear case where you have been punished for non of your fault. you should have joined that case in high court as necessary party because your stakes were also involved into that. However , how you can come out the basic questionis this and now for that purpose you do one thing that you take help of a lawyer 1. file a FIR against borrower and his family members and also against the officer incharge of case who did not disclose all the facts before court 2 you file a writ petition to open the case and make you necessary party and rehearing / reappreciation of the facts and law