Dear Client,
In your case, seeking redressal through the Consumer Court is a valid approach, given the multiple issues, including delayed service, inadequate communication, unjustified charges, safety concerns, and mental distress due to the vehicle’s recurring problems. Below are steps and legal advice for filing a complaint in the consumer court, including fees, compensation eligibility, and additional suggestions.
1. Grounds for Consumer Complaint
Based on the issues you have described, you can file a consumer complaint under the following grounds:
Deficiency of Service: The delayed return, failure to provide adequate information, unjustified charges, and failure to perform repairs to a satisfactory standard.
Unfair Trade Practices: Refusal to release the vehicle due to issues with insurance, failure to provide a correct bill, and the poor quality of repairs despite charging a large amount.
Mental Harassment and Safety Risk: The distress caused by the recurring breakdowns, particularly the wiper issue that put your family’s safety at risk.
2. How to File a Consumer Complaint
Draft a Complaint: You need to draft a formal complaint describing all the issues you have faced, including:
Vehicle repair delay and inconvenience caused.
Lack of communication and transparency from the service center.
Unjustified fuel charges and incorrect billing.
Substandard service and the risk posed by inadequate repairs (wiring issues, mudguard, platform mat, etc.).
Mental distress caused by the breakdowns and the poor service quality.
Prepare Supporting Documents: Attach copies of all relevant documents, including:
Service center receipts and bills.
Photos of the car's condition (if available).
Communication records with the service center (messages, emails, call logs).
Insurance claim documents.
Any warranty papers, vehicle purchase documents, and other relevant records.
Submit the Complaint: You can submit the complaint online via the National Consumer Helpline (NCH) or approach the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission.
3. Filing Fees
The fees for filing a complaint in the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission are based on the value of the claim. Since the cost of the car and service is approximately ₹10,66,000,
The filing fees for this category are typically Rs.400-2000
4. Compensation You Can Seek
Compensation can be claimed for the following aspects:
Refund of Repair Costs: Since the repair services were inadequate, you can claim a refund of ₹1,09,000 paid for the service.
Compensation for Mental Harassment: For the inconvenience, stress, and risk posed to your family, you can seek compensation for mental distress. In such cases, consumer courts have awarded ₹1,00,000 - ₹5,00,000 depending on the severity of the harassment.
Loss of Use and Inconvenience: Given the delay in returning the vehicle and the subsequent breakdowns, you can claim compensation for the inconvenience caused, often around ₹1,00,000 - ₹2,00,000.
Legal Costs: You can also request reimbursement for the legal costs of pursuing the case.
Considering all the aspects of your case, you could seek compensation of ₹5,00,000 to ₹7,00,000 for the distress, inadequate service, and safety risks faced by your family.
5. Legal Steps to Take
Send a Legal Notice: Before filing a formal complaint, it’s advisable to send a legal notice to the service center, detailing the issues and demanding compensation for the deficient service, within a stipulated time (15-30 days). This can sometimes prompt the service center to resolve the matter without going to court.
File a Formal Complaint: If the service center does not respond or refuses to take responsibility, you can proceed with filing the complaint in the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum.
Engage a Lawyer: Though not mandatory, hiring a lawyer experienced in consumer cases can help in drafting the complaint, gathering evidence, and representing you in court.
6. Additional Points
Claim Safety Issues: Highlight the safety concerns caused by the wiring issues and incomplete repairs. Consumer courts take vehicle safety matters seriously, especially if they involve risk to life.
Continuous Service Deficiency: The repeated breakdowns (battery, wiper issues) after paying a significant amount for repairs can strengthen your case for a higher compensation amount.
Goodwill of Manufacturer: If the service center is authorized by the car manufacturer, mention the manufacturer’s liability for ensuring adequate service through their authorized dealers.
You have a strong case for claiming compensation due to deficient service, unjustified charges, and mental harassment caused by the service center. You could seek compensation of approximately ₹5,00,000 - ₹7,00,000 in addition to a refund of the ₹1,09,000 service cost.
Regards
Respected sir/ma'am,
Kindly look into the case of
Religare Health Ins. Co. Ltd. vs Harwant Singh And Another on 8 February, 2021.
You can file an application in the STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Section 19 of the General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act, 1972 states that it shall be the duty of every Insurance Company to carry on general insurance business so as to develop it to the best advantage of the community. The denial of medical expenses reimbursement is utterly arbitrary on the ground that diseases, in question, were pre-existing disease. It is mere an excuse to escape liability and is not bona fide intention of the insurance company. Fairness and non-arbitrariness are considered as two immutable pillars supporting the equity principle, an unshakable threshold of State and public behavior. Any policy in the realm of insurance company should be informed, fair and non-arbitrary. When the insurance policy has exclusions/conditions to repudiate the claim or limit the liability, the same must be specifically brought to the notice of the insured and are required to be got signed to show that such exclusions and conditions have been brought to his/her notice.
22. The need for interpreting a contract always arises in two situations, (i) when a gap is needed to be filled in the contract and (ii) an ambiguity is needed to be resolved in the contract, then to find out correct intention of the contract, spirit behind it is required to be considered. Normally, the insurance policy is a contract of adhesion in which other party is left with hardly any bargaining power as compared to the insurer. Insurance contracts are standard form contracts and are drafted by the insurance company and as such, insurance company is at higher footing than the insured. The benefit of such clause, as exclusion clause, would go to the insured unless the same is explained in clear terms by the insurer. In such circumstances, the tribunal would be more oriented towards the interpretation which goes against the party who has inserted/drafted the disputed clause in the agreement/contract. The adjudicating authority is required to look into whether the intention of the party is to exclude or limit liability has been appropriately explained to the other party or not. This Commission while interpreting insurance agreement is to honour the intention of the parties, who have signed the agreement. Even if the agreement had general exclusion/condition for misrepresentation still fraudulent misrepresentation and non-disclosure may not be there. The innocent and negligent misrepresentations are to be ignored.
Share on
×