How much do property lawyers charge in India?

The cost of property disputes lawyer may vary based on location, experience, and most importantly the technicalities related to case facts and property value. Thus, there is no fixed ratio of how much a property lawyer in India may charge.

What does a property lawyer do?

Property cases vary based on the nature of property involved, the difficulty of facts and document proofs. A property lawyer looks into the matter, collects the documents and other evidence, prepares the claims and thereafter goes on with the petitioner or respondent for the property cases involved. Property disputes lawyer are mainly responsible for representing their client’s case before the court and prove their claims.

Should I hire a property lawyer near me?

Yes. Location of the property is important for jurisdiction. A local property lawyer in India knows the process better and may be of more help as compared to the property lawyer in India. For example, one should hire property lawyers in Delhi for matters related to a property located in Delhi itself.

How much does it cost to file a property case in India?

To calculate the court fees for property cases, the value of such property, the court of jurisdiction (District Courts/High Court/ Supreme Court of India), etc. play an important role. Apart from that, the advocate for land case near me may charge more than a mediocre experienced property disputes lawyer. Hence, the range of cost for property cases can not be depicted without any details of the matter involved.

Property Lawyers in Delhi | Property Lawyers Delhi

Our Team

Advocate Abhimanyu Shandilya

Advocate Prabhakara Shetty Best Property Lawyer in Delhi

Advocate Prabhakara S K Shetty

Advocate Shrikrushna Tambde

Advocate Adrian Phillips

Advocate Noel D'Souza

Advocate Surbhi Sharma

Advocate Meenakshi Periyahkaruppan

Advocate Mayur Khunti Best Property Lawyer in Delhi

Advocate Mayur D. Khunti

Advocate Abhradip Jha

Advocate Jaswant Katariya Best Property Lawyer in Delhi

Advocate Jaswant Singh Katariya

Advocate Rhea Luthra

Advocate Prithvi Raj Sikka

Courts

Offices

Blogs

Legal challenges and constitutional debates surrounding the waqf (amendment) act, 2025

How to resolve property disputes in india legally

Supreme court ensures fair market value for delayed land compensation

Submit Your Legal Query

Name

Country Code*

Phone

Category

Service Needed

State

City

Details

Prove that you are not a Robot by clicking on the above Captha !

Property Lawyers in Delhi

If you are looking for any property related services then it is to consult property lawyers In Delhi. There are many property lawyers in Delhi who handles matters of NCR region. If your property is in NCR then consulting a property lawyers in Delhi helps you to understand different laws applicable to your property or the property in issue.

Laws applicable to Property related Matters?

Indian Contract Act, 1872
Registration Act, 1908
Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Indian Easement Act, 1882
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (at instances of land acquisition)
Specific Relief Act, 1963 –Part II
Stamp Act, 1988

What does Constitution of India Reveal about Property?

Initially, Right to Property was a fundamental right under the Constitution in the form of-

Article 19(f) which spoke about the right to acquire, hold and dispose of property, subject to reasonable restrictions

& Article 31 which, as originally enacted, said that no person shall be deprived of his property except by authority of law.

Forty Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of India, deleted Article 19(1)(f) and Article 31[Article 300-A is now the provision regarding right to property]. The current position of the Supreme Court on interpretation on the right to property can be gleaned from one of the few direct judgements on property after the 44^th Amendment, particularly the case of ‘Jilubhai Nanbhai Khachar Etc. v. State of Gujrat And Anr. Etc.’. This case dealt with mines taken by the State under legislated laws from erstwhile revenue farmers and upheld the right of the State to do so under Article 300-A, not entertaining any discussion on adequacy of compensation. Among other things, it is unequivocally held that the right to property under Article 300-A is not a “basic feature or structure of the Constitution” and that the Legislature has power to acquire the property of private person exercising the power of eminent domain by a law for public purpose