Bank account freeze from legal enforcement agency
10 months ago
I am student studying outside India I am basically from Gujrat before 1 week I got to know that my bank account is freeze I have niyo global sbm account after thousands of mail I got to know that it is freeze from the instructions of legal enforcement agency and they told to contact bank diractly so I send my relative to the bank because they are not responding to mail but when my relative went there they refused to tell anything not even which agency freezed my account now I am sitting here outside of India and on mail there is no response from them how can I know which agency freezed my account or from where or how can I defreez my account?
A.Dear Client,
Under the Right to Information Act, 2005, you got the right to seek information from the office of a Public Authority or an office or deptt under the control of a public Authority. All the Banks or NBFC including public or private banks are regulated and controlled by the guidelines of RBI. So if you are not aware of the Central Public Information Officer of the Concerned Bank, you may put up an application under Sec.6(1) of RTI Act, 2005 addressing the CPIO of RBI seeking information behind the seizure of your Bank account. As per Rule 3 of RTI Central Rules, an application fee of Rs.10/- is payable by way of Indian Postal Orders to be enclosed with the said application seeking information which is to be replied by the Public Authority within 30 days of receipt of the application u/s.7(1) of the Act providing the information sought by you if the same is not restricted from disclosure to public u/s.8 & 9 of the Act.
Under the Right to Information Act, 2005, you got the right to seek information from the office of a Public Authority or an office or deptt under the control of a public Authority. All the Banks or NBFC including public or private banks are regulated and controlled by the guidelines of RBI. So if you are not aware of the Central Public Information Officer of the Concerned Bank, you may put up an application under Sec.6(1) of RTI Act, 2005 addressing the CPIO of RBI seeking information behind the seizure of your Bank account. As per Rule 3 of RTI Central Rules, an application fee of Rs.10/- is payable by way of Indian Postal Orders to be enclosed with the said application seeking information which is to be replied by the Public Authority within 30 days of receipt of the application u/s.7(1) of the Act providing the information sought by you if the same is not restricted from disclosure to public u/s.8 & 9 of the Act.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
A.Dear Sir/Madam,
Under the following provisions the Hon’ble Magistrate Court having ample powers to unfreeze the Bank accounts. Further, the Hon’ble Court has vast powers to hand over the properties/vehicles seized by the Police and other authorities to the owners of the properties/vehicles. Such interim orders normally will be made within 30 days of such interim application and on such orders the Police and other authorities are bound to hand over the properties/vehicles to the persons in whose favour such orders are passed.
Section 451 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973
451. Order for custody and disposal of property pending trial in certain cases. When any property is produced before any Criminal Court during any inquiry or trial, the Court may make such order as it thinks fit for the proper custody of such property pending the conclusion of the inquiry or trial, and, if the property is subject to speedy and natural decay, or if it is otherwise expedient so to do, the Court may, after recording such evidence as it thinks necessary, order it to be sold or otherwise disposed of. Explanation.- For the purposes of this section," property" includes-
(a) property of any kind or document which is produced before the Court or which is in its custody,
(b) any property regarding which an offence appears to have been committed or which appears to have been used for the commission of any offence.
457. Procedure by police upon seizure of property.
(1) Whenever the seizure of property by any police officer is reported to a Magistrate under the provisions of this Code, and such property is not produced before a Criminal Court during an inquiry or trial, the Magistrate may make such order as he thinks fit respecting the disposal of such property or the delivery of such property to the person entitled to the possession thereof, or if such person cannot be ascertained, respecting the custody and production of such property.
(2) If the person so entitled is known, the Magistrate may order the property to be delivered to him on such conditions (if any) as the Magistrate thinks fit and if such person is unknown, the Magistrate may detain it and shall, in such case, issue a proclamation specifying the articles of which such property consists, and requiring any person who may have a claim thereto, to appear before him and establish his claim within six months from the date of such proclamation.
Keeping seized vehicle in open air may harm it; petition for custody of vehicle under Section 457 CrPC allowed
•
Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anjuli Palo, J., addressed matter where petitioner was aggrieved by an impugned order passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge Itarsi in a criminal revision whereby the application under Section 457 CrPC, 1973 was dismissed.
The petitioner’s vehicle was seized by the police for crime under Sections 4, 6 and 9 of the M.P. GauvansVadhPratishedhAdhiniyam, 2004 and Section 11 of PashuKoortaAdhiniyam, 1960. This petition was filed under Section 482 of Code praying the release of petitioner’s vehicle by virtue of Section 457 of the Code on grounds that impugned orders seizing petitioner’s vehicle were illegal and arbitrary and the vehicle had been kept in open space which could damage the vehicle. Court relied on the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat, (2002) 10 SCC 290 where it was held that seized vehicle should be released as keeping it in open could cause harm to the vehicle. Therefore, Court set aside the impugned order as a result of which the vehicle’s interim custody was given to petitioner on furnishing of a personal bond. [Mohd.Irfan v. State of M.P.,2018 SCC OnLine MP 457, dated 03-08-2018]
Under the following provisions the Hon’ble Magistrate Court having ample powers to unfreeze the Bank accounts. Further, the Hon’ble Court has vast powers to hand over the properties/vehicles seized by the Police and other authorities to the owners of the properties/vehicles. Such interim orders normally will be made within 30 days of such interim application and on such orders the Police and other authorities are bound to hand over the properties/vehicles to the persons in whose favour such orders are passed.
Section 451 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973
451. Order for custody and disposal of property pending trial in certain cases. When any property is produced before any Criminal Court during any inquiry or trial, the Court may make such order as it thinks fit for the proper custody of such property pending the conclusion of the inquiry or trial, and, if the property is subject to speedy and natural decay, or if it is otherwise expedient so to do, the Court may, after recording such evidence as it thinks necessary, order it to be sold or otherwise disposed of. Explanation.- For the purposes of this section," property" includes-
(a) property of any kind or document which is produced before the Court or which is in its custody,
(b) any property regarding which an offence appears to have been committed or which appears to have been used for the commission of any offence.
457. Procedure by police upon seizure of property.
(1) Whenever the seizure of property by any police officer is reported to a Magistrate under the provisions of this Code, and such property is not produced before a Criminal Court during an inquiry or trial, the Magistrate may make such order as he thinks fit respecting the disposal of such property or the delivery of such property to the person entitled to the possession thereof, or if such person cannot be ascertained, respecting the custody and production of such property.
(2) If the person so entitled is known, the Magistrate may order the property to be delivered to him on such conditions (if any) as the Magistrate thinks fit and if such person is unknown, the Magistrate may detain it and shall, in such case, issue a proclamation specifying the articles of which such property consists, and requiring any person who may have a claim thereto, to appear before him and establish his claim within six months from the date of such proclamation.
Keeping seized vehicle in open air may harm it; petition for custody of vehicle under Section 457 CrPC allowed
•
Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anjuli Palo, J., addressed matter where petitioner was aggrieved by an impugned order passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge Itarsi in a criminal revision whereby the application under Section 457 CrPC, 1973 was dismissed.
The petitioner’s vehicle was seized by the police for crime under Sections 4, 6 and 9 of the M.P. GauvansVadhPratishedhAdhiniyam, 2004 and Section 11 of PashuKoortaAdhiniyam, 1960. This petition was filed under Section 482 of Code praying the release of petitioner’s vehicle by virtue of Section 457 of the Code on grounds that impugned orders seizing petitioner’s vehicle were illegal and arbitrary and the vehicle had been kept in open space which could damage the vehicle. Court relied on the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat, (2002) 10 SCC 290 where it was held that seized vehicle should be released as keeping it in open could cause harm to the vehicle. Therefore, Court set aside the impugned order as a result of which the vehicle’s interim custody was given to petitioner on furnishing of a personal bond. [Mohd.Irfan v. State of M.P.,2018 SCC OnLine MP 457, dated 03-08-2018]
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Read Related Answers
Bank ke dwara 13 2 ka jawab nahi Dena
Dear Client,
According to Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act, the borrower is required to repay the outstanding dues within 60 days from the date of the notice. If the borrower fails to comply with the not...
Money in account is put on hold by cyber cell
Dear Client,
When a cyber complaint is field on National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (NCCRP) or in case of any police complaint, the Cyber Crime Cell directs the concerned bank to freeze the accounts...
Online job fraud
Dear Client,
Please register a complaint with cyber security for online fraud and scam. Complaints can be reported through helpline number 1930 or on National Cybercrime Reporting Portal. Or you can a...
Loan
Dear Client,
A co-applicant/borrower is equally liable for repayment of the debt if the principal Borrower fails to repay it and if after exercising all the steps for recovery of debt against the Bor...
Compassionate appointment
Dear Client,
The SBI rules can not be breached. it could be the policy of the bank to not hire anyone. Please check with the rules and guidelines for heiring employees
Read Blogs on Banking
Banking Lawyers
Find Lawyers by Location
