Job appointment discrimination
7 months ago
Central University of Rajasthan make advt for appointment of assistant professor on contract for academic session 2023-24. 1 post in mathematics in EWS category. Three persons applied for the same and only one person attand the interview (me). Appointment body make a discrimination against me because I donot have PHd degree however PhD degree is not a compulsory qualification for assistant professor job. I have all necessary qualifications and category certificate that is why my interview is conducted on 8th sept 2023. Now University again give a new advt for the same job and for same category with same qualifications. He niegher appointed me nor give any information about it . Can I move to Rajasthan highcourt Jaipur bench. Is university have right to do so . Kindly guide me please I am suffering because I am from poor rural family.total discrimination ho rha hai University me. Agr court me jaanu to kya prayer krnu or jo pesa lgega usko University per imposed kr skte hai ya nhi. Highcourt se kya kya Rahat mil skti hai.please help me
An interview rejection letter is a customary form of communication that informs job candidates they're not moving forward in the hiring process. Rejection letters after interviews are generally sent within a two-week period, and they typically consist of one to two paragraphs that are concise and to the point.
Candidates who are Ph.D. Holders are eligible for direct recruitment of Assistant professors as per earlier UGC guidelines. As per the recent UGC guidelines, Ph.D. qualification for appointment as an Assistant Professor would be optional from 01 July 2023. NET/SET/SLET shall be the minimum criteria for the direct recruitment to the post of Assistant Professor for all Higher Education Institutions. So, now being a Ph. D. is optional for recruitment of Asstt. Professor, a University or Higher Education Institution can set up its recruitment policy preferring a candidate having a Ph.D. for appointment of Asst. Professor. Accordingly, the University again published a new advt for the same job. It may be kept in mind that interviews, selection, appointment/recruitment etc, all activities are considered as a prerogative and were carried on by respective institutions or establishments as per the well-established recruitment policy made out considering necessity, suitability, standards, and a variety of factors and following the principle of natural justice. You being a single candidate out of three in the said selection process having no Ph. D, the selection committee did not consider your criteria suitable for the position. Position and academic qualifications are two different subjects. Academic qualifications cannot be the only criterion for a selection or recruitment for any position. A candidate holding the same qualification can not claim his selection for a position as a matter of right. Above all, it is the prerogative of the selection committee to decide who is suitable and to be selected or not for a vacancy following the well-established recruitment policy. Only in case of deviation/discrimination/mala fide in the selection or recruitment process, if appears on the face of the record/recruitment process, the High Court may admit/entertain an appeal challenging the selection process that violates the standing norms and guidelines of the well-established recruitment policy. Otherwise, an appeal may be rejected at the stage of admission. So, try to get the matter reviewed by an expert professional before challenging the selection process before the High Court.
Need help in securing my stake that was promised verbally
Seeking Legal Advice Regarding Employment Issue
Accountant in a production house
Not paid the April month salary
Salary deduction for not serving notice period
