Track Your Request
Track Your Request
+91-7604047602 Our Team About Us Legal Blog Free Legal Advice Login
Vidhikarya Text Logo


This blog shall explain you about the prolonged delays in the Justice Delivery System of the Indian Judiciary

We have been seeing how the Indian Court System works, we have also been seeing on the delivery of orders which take more than a decade to punish the wrong doers. How does it affect the Justice Delivery System? Is delivering justice after such long time periods really justice? Is Justice, if at all delayed is denied?

Answering all these questions, today I write this blog analyzing whether the old fashioned quote as we quote it time and again “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied” stands ground when it actually comes to it.

I often used to think and be happy when my parents used to say finally justice has been delivered, the wrong doers are punished and that used to make me smile. With me being older and understanding things better, I now started to question the same. The question which started popping up every now and then is – How long is too long?

Should I say I am proud to witness the Nirbhaya rapists hanged, or the Ram Mandir conflict settled or perhaps proud to be a part of the population who saw the Apex Court restrict the sale of acid. This is exactly where it hurts. The point of concern is how do we define justice? What is justice to us? How do we look forward to justice?

Is justice for us a paper inked by a presiding Judge who has given a judgement which shall punish the wrong doers for the crime or maybe deliver a judgement which we were waiting for years? And once that is done we go out and tell the world that justice has finally been delivered. Well against popular belief, justice to me does not mean this. The very definition of justice is abused if you have to ask me. If the definition of justice is so narrowly construed so as to cover it in ink with a paper after prolonged situation where the victims die and the accused having spent years in prison just to face the wrath of the delay in justice delivery system does not mean justice to me.

We all have heard of the maxim “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied”, not many however; have heard of the maxim “Justice Hurried is Justice Buried”.

There needs to be quick and prompt trial with respect to criminal offences which is what the doctor has ordered to repose faith of the litigants in the Indian Judiciary. The Constitution of India guarantees its citizen with the Right to speedy trial by virtue of Article 21, whereas the first written form with regards to speedy trial can be found in the 1215 Magna Carta (clause 40).

It would not be wrong to say that our justice delivery system suffers from what I would call a “slow motion syndrome” even in grave cases which is nowhere in consistency with the “Fair Trial” mechanism.

15th day of August, 1947 the day world’s second most populated country at this point of time got its independence from the British Raj. There was a lot of hue and cry, never did we know that this independence was just another struggle so as to form an independent nation that has to establish democracy based on the principles of – justice, liberty, equality, sovereignty, fraternity, secularism and so much more.

We have gone past the days where barbarism was prominent, thereafter we have seen civilizations progress and gone through a variety of changes, today as I write, I find the very progressed society which once fought with barbarism becoming a victim to the dilatoriness in the process of getting justice.

Acid attacks, rapes, murder, extortion, scams, cheating, homicides and what not. All of this feels like a comic book story to be read with my morning cup of coffee when I hold up the newspaper. Trust me when I say this, it has become a habit now. The wheels of justice are way too slow for the criminals right now; slow however, will be an ‘overstatement’ looking at the present scenario.

This is what I was taught when I was a kid – in my mother’s words if I have to quote “Do not feel deprived for that what you don’t have by looking at people above you. Feel privileged for that what you have by looking at people beneath you”.

Today when I look at the courtroom situation there is a plethora of emotions which come to me with the hard hitting reality of the Indian Population wherein a major portion are still uneducated and illiterate who have to spend money to move this wheel of justice, year after year and then there are decades, still the wait for justice does not end.

In the process of attaining justice, these people become destitute by the very lawmakers and protectors who have framed laws to protect their citizens from being a victim of destitution.

And then we question them who take laws in their own hand.

Failing to understand the fact that it is they who force them to do so.

When I now assess the situation I remember those dialogues from the Hollywood movies – “Justice is that friend which will come to you only once you have fought enough”. Rightly so, never has justice been delivered without fighting for it. Even the evil practice of ‘Sati’ was not abolished without the fights of ‘Raja Ram Mohan Roy’. ‘Child marriages’  is still in practice and I did not forget mention the ‘Harijans’.

How many cases exactly are we talking about here!! Be it the case of ‘Safar Hashmi’  ‘Tanduri’s’ , ‘Hashimpura massacre case’ , ‘Delhi’s uphaar cinema fire mishap’ and many more. I am not even citing the recent examples of ‘Nirbhaya’ and many more.

The worst possible failure of the Indian Judicial System in my eyes is the case of ‘Machal Lalung’.  Machal Lalung, aged 23 years, resident of Morigoan, Assam belonging to the ‘Tiwa’ tribe was arrested on false charges in the year 1951. The charges were of ‘grievous hurt’. As luck would have it, the Hon’ble Court sentenced him to prison for a period of ten years. However, due to certain health conditions he had to be transferred to ‘Tezpur’ for psychiatric treatment, he was forgotten here. In the year 1967 the doctors certified him as fit and this man now was transferred to Guwahati prison wherein he spent round about 40 years. His case never caught the eye till the time a local Human Rights group brought it to the attention to of the ‘National Human Rights Commission’. He was released in the year 2005 for a crime he never committed and his age at the time of release was 77 years or more. The Supreme Court had issued a directory order to the State of Assam to provide him with compensation and monthly assistance.

What hurts more is ‘Machal Lalung’ died in the year 2007. All I question here is this much – Is the Indian Judiciary not accountable? The very safe keepers of personal liberty held an innocent in illegal detention, released him when he was 77 years or maybe more, jailed him for four decades and we still use the victim cards of lack of judges to improve our judgement delivery system. Is there no empathy?

We hold up the high values that there is such scopes of appeal only so that 100 guilty can go unpunished but an innocent should not. What is the point of having such a structure wherein the very basis of this whole structure stands defeated?

Delivery of justice is not like the 1983 or 2011 World Cup wins. Just because we were proud then about ‘India lifting the World Cup’ should not be the way forward when the delay is humongous in nature. Accepting the fact that litigation is a circle that takes time, we cannot deny the fact that the wheels of justice cannot stop and should keep rotating at a steady pace. With the above examples given it is clear that we have taken justice given by the judiciary like a mirage in the forest, which once found gives keeps us content.

We crib about lack of judges, lack of the executive machinery and play blame games for delayed justice. But does passing the ball help? We prove that we are not well equipped, but we still fail to be accountable for the cases of ‘Machal Lalung’ and many more.

India should follow the process which is being followed by Serbia, Croatia and others. Though the mechanism cannot be rigidly followed due to the density of population that India has, keeping it as a guideline can surely help in faster adjudication. These countries have a time period guideline kept for adjudication. Any case beyond that timeline shall be in violation of the Adjudication Principles and Articles thereto. The maximum upper cap is 5 years.


I strongly oppose and disagree with those who are optimistic advocates in favor of the judgments for the recent ‘Delayed Justice’ cases. To put it more appropriately in my very in words if I have to say – “Justice is like a perishable good, you store it too long, it stops giving value. You store it long enough, it loses its meaning”.

Delay in justice is not just mere mockery of the Law, it in fact tears apart in pieces the entire fabric which when interwoven binds our faith in the Justice Delivery Mechanism of the Judicial Machinery of the State.

If delay in justice continues at the current pace, there will be a time, sooner or later which will witness ‘social anarchism’, ‘nihilism and cynicism’. The society at large will be jeopardized while everyone will watch the judicial machinery collapse under its very own created weight over the decades of delay.

“They said the society will learn once he gets hanged, the crimes escalated because the justice was delayed. They hanged yet another and everything in vain because now that they have understood it is ‘death before justice’ which is the new hash tag trending”.

“I agree that the paper inked today will become a precedent tomorrow. What I disagree is to the fact that even tomorrow another victim needs to fight for a period long enough to become another precedent for another fight of another victim”.

Posted On : March 25, 2020

Written By :
Shreyash  Mohta
Shreyash Mohta
Kolkata |

Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markService matters
As per Rule 21 of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964, (1) No Government servant shall enter into, or contract, a marriage with a person having a spouse living; and (2) No Government servant having a spouse living, shall enter into, or contract, a marriage with any person: Provided that the Central Government may permit a Government servant to enter into, or contract, any such marriage as is referred to in clause (1) or clause (2), if it is satisfied that - (a) such marriage is permissible under the personal law applicable to such Government servant and the other party to the marriage; and (b) there are other grounds for so doing. (3) A Government servant who has married or marries a person other than of Indian nationality shall forthwith intimate the fact to the Government. It is necessary to know whether you have done marriage with your partner or not.
question markpension
Dear Sir, If it is clear suicidal case no pension will be granted. I could have explained more if background is known to me. I am at your service if you visit my office. Please give me FIVE STAR if satisfied by my answers and you may approach me through Vidhikarya for further clarifications.
question markSetting up an online GK Quiz .
Dear Client, Yes, it will be totally legal to set up online GK quiz. There are many online quiz competition happening all around the world with the similar criteria as you mentioned. No liability will arise if you hold it in a fair manner. Thank You.
question markLaw Firm
Dear Client, Non-advocates can also be a proprietor of a law firm. However, they can not represent the firm in court. They can advertise or publish " advocate & Solicitors " as they are working under the capacity of the firm and not on personal limits. Thank you
question markHow to complain about lawyer
Dear Sir, BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA A complaint against an advocate has to be in the form of a petition. It has to be duly signed and verified as required under the Code of Civil Procedure. Click here to see the Advocates Act, 1961 Click here to see Parts I, II and III of the Bar Council of India Rules Click here to see Part IV of the Bar Council of India Rules (Rules on Legal Education) Click here to see Parts V, VI, VII, VIII and IX of the Bar Council of India Rules The complaint can be filed in English or in Hindi or in a regional language where the language has been declared to be a state language. In those cases where the complaint is in Hindi or in any other regional language, the State Bar Council shall translate the complaint in English whenever a disciplinary matter is sent to the Bar Council of India as per the Advocates Act. Every complaint shall be accompanied by the fees prescribed in the Bar Council of India Rules. Removal of Defects and Request for Particulars in a Complaint The Secretary of the Bar Council may require the complainant to pay the prescribed fees if the proper fee has not been paid. He can also call the complainant to remove any defects and call for the particulars or copies of the complaint or other documents as may be considered necessary. On a complaint being found to be in order, it shall be registered and placed before the Bar Council for such order as it may deem fit to pass. Withdrawal and Settlement of Complaints No matter taken up by the State Bar Council (either suo motu or on a complaint made by other parties) for misconduct of advocates shall be dropped solely by reason of its having been withdrawn, settled or otherwise compromised, or because the complainant does not want proceed with the enquiry. Before referring a complaint for misconduct of an advocate to one of its Disciplinary Committees to be specified by it, the Bar Council may require a complainant to furnish further and better particulars or may call for comments from the advocate complained against, within a time to be fixed by it. Show Cause Notice Once the Bar Council has referred the complaint to a disciplinary committee, the Registrar should expeditiously send a notice to the advocate. The notice will ask the concerned advocate to show cause within a specified date, on the complaint made against him and to submit the statement of defence, documents and affidavits in support of the defence. It will also further inform him that in case of his non-appearance on the fixed date of hearing, the matter shall be heard and determined in his absence. Appearance usually includes appearance by an advocate or through a duly authorised representative. Time of Enquiry The Chairman of the Disciplinary Committee will fix the date, hour, and place of the enquiry. This date will not ordinarily be later than thirty days from the receipt of the reference. The Registrar has to give notice of the date, hour and place to the complainant or other person aggrieved, the advocate concerned, and the Attorney General or the Additional Solicitor General of India or the Advocate General, as the case may be. Notices The notices shall, subject to necessary modification, be in Form Nos. E-1 and E-2. It shall be sent to the advocates appearing for the parties. Notice to a party not appearing by the advocate shall be sent to the address as furnished in the complaint or in the grounds of appeal. The cost of the notices shall be borne by the complainant unless the Disciplinary Committee otherwise directs. The notices may be sent ordinarily through messenger or by registered post and served on the advocate or the party concerned or his agent or other person as provided for in Order V of the Civil Procedure Code. Notice may also be sent for service through any Civil Court. Where the notice sent to any party cannot be served using the normal methods listed above, it may be served by affixing a copy in some conspicuous place in the office of the Bar Council, and also upon some conspicuous part of the house (if any) in which the party concerned is known to have last resided or had his office. Appearance and Witnesses Parties can appear in person or by an advocate who should file a vakalatnama giving the name of the Bar Council in which he is enrolled, his residential address, telephone number if any, and his address for service of notices. A Senior Advocate is entitled to appear with another advocate who has filed a vakalatnama. The Bar Council or its Disciplinary Committee may at any stage of a proceeding appoint an advocate to appear as Amicus Curiae. Such advocate may be paid such fee as the Council or the Committee may decide. Excepting when the Committee has otherwise directed, service on the advocate shall be deemed to be sufficient service on the parties concerned, even if copies of the notices are in addition sent to the parties, whether the parties have or have not been served. Unless otherwise indicated, where more than one Advocate appears for the same party, it is sufficient to serve the notice on any of them. Ex-parte Proceedings If, in an enquiry on a complaint received, either the complainant or the respondent does not appear before the Disciplinary Committee in spite of service of notice, the Committee may proceed ex-parte or direct fresh notice to be served. Any such order for proceeding ex-parte may be set aside on sufficient cause being shown, when an application is made supported by an affidavit, within 60 days of the passing of the ex-parte order. The provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply to this sub-rule. Proceedings and Exhibits The Disciplinary Committee shall hear the Attorney General or the Additional Solicitor General of India or the Advocate General, as the case may be or their advocate and parties or their advocates. The matters can be heard and determined on documents and affidavits. Unless the committee is of the opinion that it should be in the interest of justice to permit cross-examination of the deponents or to take oral evidence, in which case the procedure for the trial of civil suits shall as far as possible be followed. On every document admitted in evidence, the following endorsement shall be made which shall be signed by the Chairman or any member of the Committee: The Disciplinary Committee of Bar Council of ………………… Exhibit No ………………………… Date of Document………………………… Produced by …………………………… Date ………………………………. Signature of …………….. The exhibits shall be marked as follows: – a. Those of the complainant as C1,C2, etc. b. Those of Respondent as R1, R2,etc. c. Those of Disciplinary Committee as D1, D2, etc. The Disciplinary Committee may at any stage direct the parties or their advocates to furnish such further and better particulars, as it considers necessary. Recording of Evidence Any member of the Committee or any other person authorised by the committee shall record the evidence given before the Disciplinary Committee preferably in English. The evidence so recorded shall be signed by the Chairman or by any other member of the committee if the Chairman is not there. In the case where the records of evidence are in any other language than English and the same has to be sent to the Bar Council of India or its Disciplinary Committee, then the same has to be translated into English. Such a translation thereof in English has to be made by a person nominated by Committee or Registrar certifying the same to be true copy should also be sent. Record of Proceedings Every Disciplinary Committee shall make a record of its day-to-day proceedings. The Registrar of the Disciplinary Committee shall maintain a case diary setting out shortly in order of date, all relevant information concerning the date of filing, the date for hearing and despatch. The case diary shall also have the details of service of the notices on the parties or the Advocates or the Attorney General or the Additional Solicitor General or the advocate General as the case may be, of statements or petitions filed and/or of their order, and of other proceedings in the matter before the Committee. Dropping of Enquiries on Certain Grounds In the case of the death of the complainant during the enquiry proceedings (and if there is no representative who is willing to conduct the case), the Disciplinary Committee may having regard to the allegations made in the complaint and the evidence available, make a suitable order either to proceed with the enquiry or to drop it. In the case of an enquiry against one advocate only, on his death the Disciplinary Committee shall record the fact of such death and drop the proceedings. Where the enquiry is against more than one advocate, on the death of one of them, the Disciplinary Committee may continue the enquiry against the other advocate unless it decides otherwise. No disciplinary enquiry shall be dropped solely by reason of its having been withdrawn, settled or otherwise compromised, or that the complainant does not want to proceed with the enquiry. Dress Unless otherwise permitted, counsel appearing before any of the Disciplinary Committees of the State Bar Council or Bar Council of India shall appear in court dress. Findings and Judgment The finding of the majority of the members of the Disciplinary Committee shall be the finding of the Committee. The reason given in support of the finding may be given in the form of a judgment. If there is a difference of opinion, any member dissenting shall be entitled to record his dissent giving his own reason. It shall be competent for the Disciplinary Committee to award such costs as it thinks fit. The Registrar of the Disciplinary Committee shall send, free of charge to each of the parties in the proceedings, a certified copy of the final order or judgment. The date of an Order made by the Disciplinary Committee shall be the date on which it is first received in the office of the Bar Council after all the members have signed it. For the purpose of limitation, the date of the Order shall be the date on which the contents of the signed Order are communicated to the parties affected. Pending Matters Certified copies of the records of a case pending before the Disciplinary Committee may be granted to the parties or to their counsel on an application made in that behalf and on payment of the prescribed fee. This is mandatory unless the Committee has directed otherwise. The Secretary of a State Bar Council shall send to the Secretary of the Bar Council of India, quarterly statements of the complaints received and the stage of the proceedings before the State Bar Council and Disciplinary Committees. The Secretary of the Bar Council of India may call for further statements and particulars as he considers necessary. The Secretary of every State Bar Council shall furnish such particulars and send such statements as may be considered necessary by the Secretary of the Bar Council of India for these purposes and send them all to the records of proceedings that stand transferred. The date of receipt of the complaint or the date of the initiation of the proceedings at the instance of the State Bar Council shall be the date on which the State Bar Council refers the case for disposal to its Disciplinary Committee. Withdrawal of Proceedings Where a State Bar Council makes a report, the Secretary of the State Bar Council shall send to the Secretary of the Bar Council of India, all the records of the proceedings, along with the report. An application by a person interested in the withdrawal of a proceeding shall sign the same. It shall set out the necessary facts supported by an affidavit and accompanied by the fee prescribed. For making an order on an application of a party or otherwise for withdrawal of an application, the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India may: a. Call for a report of the Disciplinary Committee seized of the proceedings; b. Issue notice to the respondent; c. Require the parties to file such statements as it considers necessary; d. Call for the records of the proceedings; and e. Examine any witnesses. In the proceedings before the Disciplinary Committee of Bar Council of India, the parties may appear in person or by an advocate who shall file a vakalatnama. On consideration of the report of a State Bar Council or otherwise, the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India shall pass such orders as it considers proper. Appeal to the Bar Council of India An appeal to the Council from the State Bar Council shall be in the form of a memorandum in writing. If the appeal is in a language other than English, it shall be accompanied by a translation in English. In every appeal, all persons who were parties to the original proceedings alone, shall be impleaded as parties. In an appeal by the advocate against an order for misconduct, in case of death of the complainant, the legal representatives of the complainant shall be made parties. An appeal may be presented by the appellant or his advocate or by his recognised agent in the office of the Bar Council of India. It can also be sent by registered post, so as to reach the Secretary, Bar Council of India. The appeal has to be presented on or before the last day of limitation. Any appeal may be admitted after the period of limitation if the appellant satisfies the Disciplinary Committee that he has sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within such a period. Any such application for condonation of delay shall be supported by an affidavit. The memorandum of appeal shall contain necessary particulars as in Form G. The memorandum of appeal shall state when the order was communicated to the appellant and how it is in time. Along with the memorandum of appeal, the appellant shall file: a. The certified copy of the order appealed against, signed by the Registrar of the Disciplinary Committee, or b. (i) If there is only one respondent, five additional copies of the memorandum of appeal and of the order appealed against. (ii) If there is more than one Respondent, such number of additional copies as may be necessary. All copies shall be certified as true copies by the appellant or by his counsel. Every memorandum of appeal shall be accompanied by the prescribed fees in cash. If the papers filed in an appeal are not in order, the Registrar shall require the appellant to remove such defects within a specified time. Allocation of Matters in Appeal The Chairman of the Executive Committee or in his absence the Vice-Chairman of the Executive Committee) or such other member authorised in this behalf by the Council) shall have the power to allocate matters relating to the Disciplinary Committee. Sometimes the Council allots a particular case to any one particular Disciplinary Committee. Any matter allotted to a particular Disciplinary Committee, which has not been heard, may be reallocated to a different Disciplinary Committee. Interim Orders in Appeal The Chairman of any Disciplinary Committee shall have powers to issue interim orders on urgent matters which may be placed before him by the Registrar. Time and Date in Appeal Subject to any resolution of the Bar Council of India relating to the places of hearing, the Chairman of the Disciplinary Committee concerned shall fix the date, hour and place for the hearing of the appeal. Exhibits and Records in Appeal The appellant shall be required to file six typed sets of the papers properly paged and indexed, if there is only one respondent. In case of multiple respondents, as many more sets as there may be number of respondents, for the use of the Disciplinary Committee and by the other parties and for the record. The papers to be filed are: – a. The complaint and the statement in the defence of the advocate, b. The oral and documentary evidence and such other papers on which parties intend to rely, c. Any other part of the record as may be directed by the Committee. Where any of the above papers is in a language other than English, English translations thereof will be filed. The respondent shall, if he so desires, or if so called upon, file six sets of typed papers of any part of the record on which he intends to rely. He shall also file English translations of papers that are not in English. Notice of Hearing in Appeal The Registrar shall give notices to the parties, informing them of the date, the time and the place of the hearing of the appeal. A copy of the memorandum of appeal shall be sent to the respondent along with the notice of the appeal. Withdrawal of Appeal No appeal filed against an order of punishment of an advocate shall be permitted to be withdrawn on account of settlement or compromise or adjustment of the claim against the advocate. Every appeal filed by or against an advocate shall abate on the death of the advocate so far as he is concerned. Records from State Bar Councils The Registrar shall issue notice to the State Council concerned for the complete records to be sent to the Council. The Registrar of the State Council concerned shall send along with the records a list containing particulars under the following columns and comply with such other directions as may be issued. Serial number of document Date of document Description of document Page number Application for Stay An application for stay shall be made by the applicant with at least five copies of the application, and the affidavit and as many additional copies as there are respondents. Where the application is not in English, five copies with translation in English shall also be filed. In every application for stay made to the Council, the applicant shall state if any application has been made to the State Council and the orders on the same. Before a matter is allotted to a Disciplinary Committee the registrar may obtain orders on applications for interim stay or other urgent applications from the Chairman of any of the Disciplinary Committees. The orders passed shall be communicated to the parties and to the Secretary of the Bar Council concerned. The Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India shall exercise all the powers exercised by the Civil Court or Court of Appeal under C.P.C. I could have explained more if background is known to me. I am at your service if you visit my office. Please give me FIVE STAR if satisfied by my answers and you may approach me through Vidhikarya for further clarifications.

Please enter the text



Send your queries to

[email protected]
Consult Work Permits Lawyers from your City!
Post Your Matter
Post Your Matter to connect with the Lawyer online
Call 7604047602 for any assistance
Our Team
Lawyer Login
Be a Partner

Download the Lawyers App on

Vidhikarya App on Android Platform
Contact Details
[email protected]
No. 2, First Floor, Subharaj
Plot No. CE/1/C/19, Premises No. 18-0208,
Action Area- 1, New Town