Legal Crossroads: CrPC 120 & Criminal Conspiracy IPC


Posted On : January 15, 2024
Legal Crossroads: CrPC 120 & Criminal Conspiracy IPC
Listen to this article

Table of Contents

Introduction

The Indian Penal Code (IPC) is the bedrock of criminal law in India, encompassing a wide array of offenses and their punishments. Among its provisions, the concept of criminal conspiracy holds significant weight, addressing collaborative efforts aimed at committing illegal acts. Section 120-A and 120-B of the IPC deal explicitly with criminal conspiracy and its implications.

Defining Criminal Conspiracy IPC

Under Section 120-A of the IPC, a criminal conspiracy IPC is defined as an agreement between two or more individuals to commit an illegal act or an act that is not illegal by illegal means. It involves a meeting of minds and an understanding among the conspirators to pursue a common objective that involves the commission of an offense.

Elements of Criminal Conspiracy IPC

For a charge of criminal conspiracy to stand, certain elements must be present:

  1. Agreement: There must be a meeting of minds, an agreement or understanding between two or more persons to commit an illegal act or a lawful act by illegal means.
  2. Intention: The individuals involved must have the intention to commit the offense. Mere discussion or knowledge of an illegal act is not enough to establish conspiracy; there must be a clear intention to act upon the agreement.
  3. Act or Omission: The agreement should pertain to doing an act or causing an act to be done. It could also involve causing an omission which if done individually would not be an offense but becomes an offense when it’s part of the conspiracy.

Punishment for Criminal Conspiracy

Section 120-B of the IPC prescribes punishment for criminal conspiracy. The punishment is imposed for the act of conspiracy itself, irrespective of whether the intended crime is carried out or not. The punishment can range from imprisonment (which may extend to six months or fine or both) to life imprisonment, depending on the severity of the intended crime and other circumstances.

Scope and Application

Criminal conspiracy is a powerful tool in the hands of law enforcement agencies to preemptively act against potential criminal activities. It allows for the prosecution of individuals involved in planning illegal activities even before the commission of the actual offense. This is essential in preventing and deterring crimes that could have serious repercussions.

However, it’s important to note that mere association or presence with individuals involved in an unlawful act does not establish conspiracy. There must be concrete evidence of an agreement and a concerted effort towards the commission of a crime.

Challenges and Controversies

Proving criminal conspiracy often presents challenges in the legal landscape. Establishing an agreement among the alleged conspirators can be difficult, especially when dealing with circumstantial evidence or in cases where communication between the parties is encrypted or protected.

There have been debates regarding the application of conspiracy laws, especially concerning their potential misuse to target dissent or suppress legitimate political activities. Balancing the need to prevent crime with safeguarding individual liberties and rights remains a delicate task.

Conclusion

Criminal conspiracy laws in the IPC play a crucial role in maintaining law and order by allowing authorities to intervene in potential criminal activities at an early stage. However, the application of these laws requires a careful examination of evidence to ensure that justice is served without infringing upon individual rights. The essence of criminal conspiracy lies in the agreement and intention to commit an offense, making it a pivotal aspect of India's criminal justice system. For more information related to Criminal Conspiracy, it is advisable to contact a criminal lawyer in your city. For example, if you are living in Kolkata, better contact a criminal lawyer in Kolkata.

FAQs

  1. What is criminal conspiracy under section of IPC?
    Section 120-A of the Indian Penal Code defines criminal conspiracy as an agreement between two or more people to commit an illegal act or an act that isn't illegal by illegal means.

  2. Which section of CrPC deals with conspiracy?
    The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) does not have a specific section that deals exclusively with conspiracy. However, provisions related to investigation, arrest, and trial procedures under CrPC can be invoked in cases involving conspiracy as per the Indian Penal Code (IPC) provisions, notably Section 120-B, which deals with punishment for criminal conspiracy.

  3. What is Section 121 a IPC?
    Section 121A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) deals with conspiracy to commit offenses against the State, particularly acts aimed at waging war against the Government of India.

  4. What is Section 120 of the CrPC?
    Section 120 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) pertains to the definition of "Conspiracy" and its consequences as per the Indian Penal Code (IPC). It does not directly outline provisions but refers to offenses committed as part of a criminal conspiracy, which are addressed under the IPC.
Written By:
Vidhikarya

Vidhikarya


Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markCriminal Conspiracy Case Query 1 Response(s)
Dear client, Under Section 120A of the IPC, criminal conspiracy is characterised as an arrangement between at least two individuals to attempt anything illicit, i.e.: A criminal offence A demonstration that is not restricted by regulation yet is completed unlawfully ‘Unlawful’ is defined under Section 43 of the IPC as ‘whatever establishes an offence, is illegal by regulation, or leads to a common activity’ The stipulation to Section 120A states that simply consenting to execute an activity that breaches the law makes for criminal conspiracy and that no unmistakable demonstration or unlawful exclusion should be shown. Such an unmistakable demonstration becomes fundamental when the conspiracy likely leads to something unlawful that does not establish a crime. It has no effect on whether the illegal conduct is the essential or accompanying objective of the arrangement.
question markCounter suit against False case of 133 crpc 1 Response(s)
Section 209 of the Indian Penal Code makes dishonestly making a false claim in a Court as an offence punishable with imprisonment upto two years and fine. The essential ingredients of an offence under Section 209 are: The accused made a claim; The claim was made in a Court of Justice; The claim was false, either wholly or in part; That the accused knew that the claim was false; and The claim was made fraudulently, dishonestly, or with intent to injure or to annoy any person. if you believe false claims have been made against you and you want to file a counter-case, it's crucial to consult with a qualified attorney to guide you through the specific legal process. Generally, for filing a counter-case, your lawyer would draft a counter-affidavit presenting your version of events and the reasons why the claims against you are false. This would be filed in the same court where the original case was initiated. The duration of legal proceedings can vary widely based on factors like the complexity of the case, court backlog, and the diligence of involved parties. Your attorney can provide a more accurate estimate based on the specifics of your situation. Act promptly, as legal processes can take time, and it's essential to present a strong and timely defense against false allegations. Thankyou
question markGeneral Queries 3 Response(s)
Dear sir, My answers are as follows: 1)What is better: to file two separate complaints or one combined complaint for cheque bounce u/s 138 NIA and 420 IPC? What are pros and cons of both? Ans: Only one complaint can be file under section 138 2) Is it mandatory to first file police complaint under sec 420 IPC and only if it rejects to take it then and then only one can approach the court of law? or one can directly complain to the court? Can one directly file a private complaint case to the court instead of requesting it to order the police to register the FIR under CrPC? Ans. Normally when 138 is made out complaint under section 420 may not be registered but it is not general rule. 3) If an FIR is filed with police for cheating, can the complainant hire a private lawyer instead of or in addition to public prosecutor? Ans: With great difficulty. 4) What's better in case of sec 420 IPC complaint in cheque bounce: to file FIR with police and leave it up to the state or file private complaint in the court and hire a private lawyer? Ans: to leave to the State to take the issue. 5)Should one file a criminal case u/s 420 IPC after he loses the 138 NIA battle? Will it make any sense? Ans: only when there is separate material. 6) What legal action can be taken by the accused against a complainant who lost the case in the court of law for cheating u/s 420 IPC for cheque bounce and 138 NIA? What can be the punishments? Ans: Upto 7 years for 420 and upto 1 year for 138 7) Can one file recovery suit in the civil court and consumer forum simultaneously in a cheque dishonour case? Or only either of the two? Ans: yes, it is better to get interest. 8) If criminal court orders two times fine to the accused u/s 138 NIA, is the amount given to the complainant? If it is given to him can he also get the amount once more from a civil recovery suit won? And also from consumer forum the third time if simultaneous CPA & CPC proceedings are allowed? Will it not be an injustice to the accused? Ans: It will be adjusted in civil suit. 9) Is it necessary for the complainant to mention in every complaint details of other fora or courts in which he has filed complaints before this for the same same cause of action and current status of those cases i.e. pending, lost or won etc? Ans: Yes, it is better. For full procedure contact me on mobile through Vidhikarya. Rate me Five Star * Please visit the following link. https://vidhikarya.com/LawyerRating/9506c43f5d0b2d266a07
question markInterim maintenance 3 Response(s)
final maintenance will be more if she is not earning. it will be less if only child maintenance have to be provided. hiding the facts of sending amount online is not fatal. If order for 3,50,000 is made then you can challenge it in HC. you not filed child custody case ? Hope this clarifies, Advocate Ankur Goel (Complete Law Shield) #YourLifeYourChoice Note - This is just a small advice. Proper advice can happen only after going through details.
question markCan I file 239 and 482 crpc petitions simultaneously 5 Response(s)
Due to lockdown the listing of cases in all high courts has been affected, so think your case will be listed in due course, you can check it online. S. 239 CrPC application and s. 482 petition can't be run together. You should withdraw s.482 petition first then should file s. 239 CrPC application before the magistrate concerned. And by the way s.239 application may not be filed in DV case.