Legal Crossroads: CrPC 120 & Criminal Conspiracy IPC

Dear client, Under Section 120A of the IPC, criminal conspiracy is characterised as an arrangement between at least two individuals to attempt anything illicit, i.e.: A criminal offence A demonstration that is not restricted by regulation yet is completed unlawfully ‘Unlawful’ is defined under Section 43 of the IPC as ‘whatever establishes an offence, is illegal by regulation, or leads to a common activity’ The stipulation to Section 120A states that simply consenting to execute an activity that breaches the law makes for criminal conspiracy and that no unmistakable demonstration or unlawful exclusion should be shown. Such an unmistakable demonstration becomes fundamental when the conspiracy likely leads to something unlawful that does not establish a crime. It has no effect on whether the illegal conduct is the essential or accompanying objective of the arrangement.

Dear Sir, The conduct of other party cannot be reformed by taking revenge. You should not convert yourself into such person. Whenever any false cases filed just go to High Court and get a stay and ultimately it will be quashed.

Section 209 of the Indian Penal Code makes dishonestly making a false claim in a Court as an offence punishable with imprisonment upto two years and fine. The essential ingredients of an offence under Section 209 are: The accused made a claim; The claim was made in a Court of Justice; The claim was false, either wholly or in part; That the accused knew that the claim was false; and The claim was made fraudulently, dishonestly, or with intent to injure or to annoy any person. if you believe false claims have been made against you and you want to file a counter-case, it's crucial to consult with a qualified attorney to guide you through the specific legal process. Generally, for filing a counter-case, your lawyer would draft a counter-affidavit presenting your version of events and the reasons why the claims against you are false. This would be filed in the same court where the original case was initiated. The duration of legal proceedings can vary widely based on factors like the complexity of the case, court backlog, and the diligence of involved parties. Your attorney can provide a more accurate estimate based on the specifics of your situation. Act promptly, as legal processes can take time, and it's essential to present a strong and timely defense against false allegations. Thankyou

Dear sir, My answers are as follows: 1)What is better: to file two separate complaints or one combined complaint for cheque bounce u/s 138 NIA and 420 IPC? What are pros and cons of both? Ans: Only one complaint can be file under section 138 2) Is it mandatory to first file police complaint under sec 420 IPC and only if it rejects to take it then and then only one can approach the court of law? or one can directly complain to the court? Can one directly file a private complaint case to the court instead of requesting it to order the police to register the FIR under CrPC? Ans. Normally when 138 is made out complaint under section 420 may not be registered but it is not general rule. 3) If an FIR is filed with police for cheating, can the complainant hire a private lawyer instead of or in addition to public prosecutor? Ans: With great difficulty. 4) What's better in case of sec 420 IPC complaint in cheque bounce: to file FIR with police and leave it up to the state or file private complaint in the court and hire a private lawyer? Ans: to leave to the State to take the issue. 5)Should one file a criminal case u/s 420 IPC after he loses the 138 NIA battle? Will it make any sense? Ans: only when there is separate material. 6) What legal action can be taken by the accused against a complainant who lost the case in the court of law for cheating u/s 420 IPC for cheque bounce and 138 NIA? What can be the punishments? Ans: Upto 7 years for 420 and upto 1 year for 138 7) Can one file recovery suit in the civil court and consumer forum simultaneously in a cheque dishonour case? Or only either of the two? Ans: yes, it is better to get interest. 8) If criminal court orders two times fine to the accused u/s 138 NIA, is the amount given to the complainant? If it is given to him can he also get the amount once more from a civil recovery suit won? And also from consumer forum the third time if simultaneous CPA & CPC proceedings are allowed? Will it not be an injustice to the accused? Ans: It will be adjusted in civil suit. 9) Is it necessary for the complainant to mention in every complaint details of other fora or courts in which he has filed complaints before this for the same same cause of action and current status of those cases i.e. pending, lost or won etc? Ans: Yes, it is better. For full procedure contact me on mobile through Vidhikarya. Rate me Five Star * Please visit the following link. https://vidhikarya.com/LawyerRating/9506c43f5d0b2d266a07

final maintenance will be more if she is not earning. it will be less if only child maintenance have to be provided. hiding the facts of sending amount online is not fatal. If order for 3,50,000 is made then you can challenge it in HC. you not filed child custody case ? Hope this clarifies, Advocate Ankur Goel (Complete Law Shield) #YourLifeYourChoice Note - This is just a small advice. Proper advice can happen only after going through details.