Sexual Harassment 'POSH' and Men


May 28, 2019
Sexual Harassment 'POSH' and Men
Listen to this article

Table of Contents

Today in a country like India which is said to be one of the largest democracy in the world where we, the citizens of India speak about the laws being gender neutral and with the development of the society with man and woman standing on the same ground everywhere with equal opportunities almost everywhere, gone are those days when women were said to be the household workers and men had to take the responsibility of being the bread earner for the family. The male domination has been reduced ever since and all laws have been made to upheld the integrity and reputation of a female in the society.

Today, in my blog, I will be discussing about a pestering question which comes to my mind when I read the “POSH” provisions. POSH or as we know it ‘Prevention of Sexual Harassment’ was brought into force after the landmark case of Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan.


The question which my blog will deal with today is – Can a man initiate any sort of proceedings under such an Act if in case he is sexually harassed or bullied in any manner whatsoever.

Ø The straight and general answer to such a question is a BIG NO.

Ø A man cannot initiate any sort of proceedings for himself is in case he is sexually abused/harassed or bullied in any manner whatsoever.

Ø The law in itself is not gender neutral as it expressly covers only women who are sexually harassed. The heading of the Act reads as

‘Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013’

Ø It is clear from the above heading that this Act is implemented to protect Women and not men.

Ø The answer to this question gets further clarity when we dig inside the ‘POSH’ Act.

Ø The Jurisdiction of the Act extends to the whole of India as per section I of The POSH Act. Furthermore, it defines the term ‘aggrieved woman’ u/s 2(a) of the Act. Nowhere is there any mention of a term as ‘aggrieved man’ or ‘aggrieved person’ by which one can speculate that even a man can be subject to sexual violence and needs to be protected under such acts which once made should not be exclusively kept for the redressal of women.

Ø This act not being a gender-neutral legislation fails to protect the ‘male victims’ of such sexual violence who do not find any sort of protection under the same. Therefore, the safeguards under such Act is for the women only and so to say it is also exclusive in its nature.

Now the next question that comes to my mind is – ‘Can someone else file a complaint under the Act?’

Ø The answer to that is a YES.

If we look into section 9 (2) of the Act it does provide for someone else to file a complain provided that

1.      The aggrieved woman is unable to make the complain herself due to physical or mental inability or in case of death of such person.

her legal heirs or any other person who is prescribed may file a complain on her behalf.

However, the Act does not specify any other individual apart from a woman who can have the liberty to file a complain under the proviso of this Act.


Applicability of the Act

To answer the first question, I must say that we should look into the applicability of the Act as it will give us a clear idea of the people to whom such Act is applicable. When we read the applicability of the Act, we find that this Act is applicable only to women. An aggrieved woman can invoke the ‘POSH’ Laws but on the other hand if the victim of the same is a man then in such a circumstance he needs to rely on the company rules/regulations/policies and procedures because the ‘POSH’ Laws do not cover aggrieved men under its broad ambit and purview.


Indian Penal Code in Relation to 'POSH' Law

When we look into the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and relate the same to sexual offence we find a newly inserted section in the Penal Laws which deals with Sexual Harassment. Section 354A of The Indian Penal Code, 1860 deals with Sexual Harassment and it has also made it a ‘cognizable offence’.

By making Sexual Harassment a cognizable offence one means to say that – A police at any time may arrest without warrant any such person who is charged under the above-named section.

Section 354A in itself is not gender neutral as it levies the conduct of Sexual Harassment to a man whereas imposes the victimization of the same to a woman. The law makers did not feel the need to introspect into the idea that ‘Sexual Harassment’ in itself is a gender-neutral crime and anyone can be sexually harassed irrespective of their gender.

The section reads as follows: -

1.     A man committing any of the following acts shall be deemed to be guilty of an act of sexual offence.

a.      Physical Contact

b.     Sexual Advances which are unwelcoming

c.      Explicit Sexual overtures

d.     Request for Sexual favors

e.      Making Sexually colored remarks

f.       Showing pornography content against the will of such person

Such person shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term extending to a maximum period of three years with fine or with both.

Other than the above section there are other various sections of IPC which deal with offences of Sexual Harassment. Such as Section’s 354/354C/354D/375/376 and 509.


Criticism of the 'POSH' Act

There have been many criticisms about the said Act and most of which have been resolved in the Draft Bill of 2012.

The major criticisms are as under: -

1.     The Act did not cover women of the armed forces and those who are agricultural workers.

As a result of which the terminology of the Act changed its clause to “No woman shall be subjected to sexual harassment at any workplace” as a result of which widening its scope to every woman in India and giving them protection under the Act.

2.     Another major criticism is that the bill does not cover or protect men in any way. Manoj Mitta of The Times of India complained that Bill does not protect men, saying it "is based on the premise that only female employees needed to be safeguarded.

3.     There have been some tribunals who have commented on the constitutionality of section 4 and 7 of the said Act.


Personal Opinion

From the above it is very clear that a man under whatsoever circumstance cannot take any legal action under the ‘POSH’ Act. The Act in itself is not gender neutral and it believes female to be the weaker sex who can be exploited and hence need protection. It clearly sets an example whereby upon the bare reading of the provisions of the Act one can come to a conclusion that a female can never be the sexual offender however; she can always be the one who is sexually exploited. On the contrary the framework of such a legislation without prejudice categorizes a man as a sexual offender and fails to introspect a situation whereby even a man can be a victim to such a heinous crime, setting the legislation up as non-gender neutral, this Act formulates the policy that it is only the female employee or for that fact only a female who needs protection from Sexual Harassment and that men cannot be Sexually Harassed as they are always the one who are the force behind such Sexual Offences.

Under any circumstance if a man becomes a victim of Sexual Offence whereby the wrong doer is a woman then in no circumstance is there any legislation which particularly protects the victimized male gender just like there is ‘POSH’ which protects the victimized female gender. The man needs to be at the mercy of company policies/bye laws/rules and regulations as there is no particular statute which gives any form of redressal to the victimized man.


 

Written By:
Shreyash  Mohta

Shreyash Mohta


Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markComplaint against Disciplinary Authority 3 Response(s)
Dear Madam, Your query is too lengthy which cannot be read within 5 minutes. Please give brief history and two or three questions.
question markLegally advice for sexual harassment case 2 Response(s)
Dear Sir Please approach the following authority or similar authority in a state The Office Commissioner of Labour Karmika Bhavan, Dairy Circle, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore-29. 080-29753078 [email protected] Addresses of Labor Inspectors in Bengaluru in different locations https://karmikaspandana.karnataka.gov.in/page/Contact+Us/Labour+Inspector/en https://clc.gov.in/clc/regional-offices/bangalore#:~:text=1.&text=Shram%20Sadan%2C%203rd%20Main%2C%203rd,Yeswanthpur%2C%20Bangalore%2D560022.. ======================================================================= Section 12 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 12. Duties of conciliation officers.- (relevant section 12(2) of ID Act) (1) Where any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended, the conciliation officer may, or where the dispute relates to a public utility service and a notice under section 22 has been given, shall hold conciliation proceedings in the prescribed manner. (2) The conciliation officer shall, for the purpose of bringing about a settlement of the dispute, without delay, investigate the dispute and all matters affecting the merits and the right settlement thereof and may do all such things as he thinks fit for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to a fair and amicable settlement of the dispute. (3) If a settlement of the dispute or of any of the matters in dispute is arrived at in the course of the conciliation proceedings the conciliationofficer shall send a report thereof to the appropriate Government 1 or an officer authorised in this behalf by the appropriate Government] together with a memorandum of the settlement signed by the parties to the dispute. (4) If no such settlement is arrived at, the conciliation officer shall, as soon as practicable after the close of the investigation, send to the appropriate Government a full report setting forth the steps taken by him for ascertaining the facts and circumstances relating to the dispute and for bringing about a settlement thereof, together with a full statement of such facts and circumstances, and the reasons on account of which, in his opinion, a settlement could not be arrived at. (5) If, on a consideration of the report referred to in sub- section (4), the appropriate Government is satisfied that there is a case for reference to a Board, 2 Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal,] it may make such reference. Where the appropriate Government does not make such a reference it shall record and communicate to the parties concerned its reasons therefor. (6) A report under this section shall be submitted within fourteen days of the commencement of the conciliation proceedings or within such shorter period as may be fixed by the appropriate Government: 3 Provided that, 4 subject to the approval of the conciliation officer,] the time for the submission of the report may be extended by such period as may be agreed upon in writing by all the parties to the dispute.] *****
question markSexual harassment 1 Response(s)
Dear Client, From the contents of the query, it appears that you left the job after signing the final report of the internal Inquiry Committee of the company. You tender your resignation citing the case of harassment that happened to you and the person against whom you brought the complaint of sexual harassment had left the company and after the lapse of 6 months, you want to reopen the complaint of sexual harassment again through a police complaint. So in this scenario, your complaint to the police may not be accepted at this belated stage especially when your earlier complaint to HRD is closed without your knowledge about the outcome of the inquiry and you left the job without pursuing the matter. In case the Police refuse to accept your complaint, you have to file a complaint before the Magistrate u/s.156(3) Cr PC for an order for registration of an FIR by the police. Under S.156(3), the magistrate has the power to direct the police to investigate in cognizable offences. Police has to register an FIR and investigate. Police have to file a final report (positive or negative) In case of positive, the court will take cognizance, issue summons and conduct trial. In 156(3) the order comes in 2 days as the court has to simply decide whether to order the registration of FIR or proceed to take the cognizance and proceed under 200 CrPC. If the court decides to proceed under 200 CrPC then the final disposal of the case will take a year or even more depending on the backlog of cases in the court. So, if you like to file a complaint at the belated stage, you need ot consult an Advocate for guidance and steps.
question markSexual harassment at workplace 2 Response(s)
There are a few details regarding company policies surrounding this that need to be considered. One of this includes when they gave you the option of a department change or a 3 month leave, did the leave mean you were allowed to return working after 3 months? There are also the need for some clarity on this part.
question markSexual harassment 1 Response(s)
Dear Client, Until and unless a final report u/s,13 of The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace(P P &R) Act, 2013 on your complaint over sexual harassment is submitted by the Internal Inquiry Committee proving or disproving your allegation, all the movements or incidents like shifting your deptts or granting you special leave for 3 months are made in compliance of Sec.12 of the Act. Based on an unethical incident you are forced to tender your resignation without serving a 30 days notice in compliance of Clause 13 of model Standing orders or even in compliance of the condition of your offer letter got no role to play during the pendency of inquiry. It is noted from your query that IIC has taken your signature in the Final inquiry Report without serving you a copy of the same which is contrary to the principle of natural justice too. So, in case you decided to resume back to your Company, then ask for the Final Inquiry Report of the Complaint and based on the recommendation of IIC to the Disciplinary Authority, you may review your decision. On the basis of the recommendation of the Final Report of Inquiry, you are also entitled to compensation as per the provision of Sec.15 of the Act. So, on receipt of Final Report of Inquiry against your complaint, the next courses of action should be reviewed afresh. In case you smell any signs of victimization or unfair labour practice from the end the Company, you may bring the matter to the notice of District Magistrate or ADM who is designated as District Officer of the Local Complaints Committee u/s.5 of the Act for redressal of your grievance. Further any publication of complaint or Inquiry Report is prohibited under Sec.16 of the Act and breach of this prohibitory clause by any person shall penal actions under Sec.17 of the Act. In case you need our assistance in this regard, you may get in touch with our legal team with all your relevant papers.
Our Expert Lawyers in Sex Crime Sexual Harassment at Workplace Criminal