clarification - i attend the interview
1 year ago
i attend the interview for a govt job due to some experience issue they were reject my candidature in 2012. so i files a writ at high court and as per the interim the one vacancy was reserved in the same year. after 10 years ie 2022 court was ordered to issue the appointment order pursuant the notification issued in the year 2012. now i got an appointment in post which was reserved for court verdict with effect from 01.05.2022. now i am seeking some clarification that
1. am i eligible to get the job with retrospective basis or not
2. if its calculated retrospective basis then am i eligible to get all promotional and financial benefits or not
A.Dear Sir,
you may not get any financial benefits since you have not served for the last 10 years however you may request the court to at least to extend promotional benefits.
you may not get any financial benefits since you have not served for the last 10 years however you may request the court to at least to extend promotional benefits.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
A.Dear client, the Judgment served in your case must have clearly mentioned about the effect of your job. Whether it is retrospective or prospective in this case depends upon the verdict of your case.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
A.Dear Client
What does the judgement/order of the high court says on that? It must have been mentioned that whether your job will be effective retrospectively or not and whether you will get those benefits or not. If not mentioned then ask for it. if they reject then again file one more case.
What does the judgement/order of the high court says on that? It must have been mentioned that whether your job will be effective retrospectively or not and whether you will get those benefits or not. If not mentioned then ask for it. if they reject then again file one more case.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Read Related Answers
Can company enforce non-poaching in case of severance
Dear Client,
To ensure benefit, from an employer's perspective, in lateral hiring amongst competitors, non-poaching clauses are often added to agreements. Non-poaching agreements are contracts entered...
Family pension eligibility
Dear Client,
According to sub-rule 6(iii) of Rule 54 of the CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972, and the circular dated 29/04/2011 of the Department of Pension and Pensioner's Welfare, GOI, the family pension...
Epfo entry for dual company
Dear Client,
When your EPF record shows an anomaly in the joining date in both the A & B Company, then until and unless the concerned employers rectify that anomaly, PF records will show dual employm...
Mental harrasment by Branch head on matter of leave
Dear Client,
It was your mistake to appreciate the remarks of the leave-approving authority before going on leave which makes you liable to face disciplinary action for unauthorised absence now. You c...
Officer is not Verifying My payment
Dear Client,
In the given scenario, If the action of the management appears to you arbitrary, unethical, and contrary to the terms of your employment, then serving a legal notice to the Company you ca...
Read Blogs on Employment and Labour
Employment and Labour Lawyers
Find Lawyers by Location