Discrimination Practice in PhD Eligibility Criteria
8 months ago
The Ph.D. eligibility criteria at one of India's premier institutions exhibit a double standard when it comes to in-service medical and non-medical candidates. Medical candidates are mandated to have a minimum of two years of continuous service at the Institute, while non-medical candidates face a notably longer requirement of five years of continuous service. This disparity in active service prerequisites appears arbitrary and lacks a discernible rationale.
In response to this grievance, the institution provided the explanation that the Ph.D. eligibility criteria are consistent with those of AIIMS Delhi and were approved during the Academic committee meeting of the institution concerned.
I personally opined that pointing out one instance of injustice to challenge another does not necessarily establish fairness. However, it does raise the question of whether such disparities are ethically justifiable, especially within a premier institution.
Can I pursue a PIL against Double standard Ph.D. eligibility terms constitute a substantial breach of fairness and equality?
Your decision is correct and appropriate which will help so many candidate. Please find out a reputed High Court advocate and proceed.
A stand-alone complaint by filing a PIL might not be admitted in the High Court if the matter does not affect the interest of the public at large. You may arrange for the signature campaign on the subject to prove the support of mass over alleged discrimination in eligibility criteria in r/o medical and non-medical candidates. You may also escalate the grievance before the UGC standing Committee or Indian Medical Council for redressal of grievance. Reach out to an Advocate for guidance and steps.
If you believe that the double standard in Ph.D. eligibility criteria at the premier institution constitutes a substantial breach of fairness and equality, you might consider pursuing a PIL. However, there are a few factors to consider:
Standing to File PIL: Generally, PILs can be filed by any individual or organization seeking to address a public interest issue. You would need to establish that you have a genuine concern for the public interest and that you are not filing the PIL for personal gain.
Proof of Public Interest: You need to demonstrate that the issue affects a larger section of society and is not just a personal grievance. The disparity in eligibility criteria might need to be linked to a broader issue of fairness and equality in educational institutions.
Court's Discretion: The court has the discretion to admit or reject a PIL. They will assess whether the issue raised is of public importance and whether the petitioner has a genuine concern.
Alternative Avenues: Before filing a PIL, you might want to explore other avenues for redressal, such as engaging with the institution through official channels or collaborating with other affected parties.
Thank You
CHit Fund
Terrace rights
Disciplinary process for officer rank employee and a management staff.
Repairing require for 4 storage Building
Disciplinary process for management staff
