Illegal termination Illegal termination

1 month ago

Sanofi India Ltd sold cardio division to Empcure Pharma and told 224 employees to join this empcure vd frsh appointment+ 12 months advance salary OR quit the job by taking 18 months AFC annual fix compensation but 12 employees did not join and demand Sanofi to retain them on Sanofi payroll ,so Sanofi terminated them with paying 18 month AFC. is this step by Sanofi is illegal under IDA 1947.

Anik

Responded 4 weeks ago

View All Answers
A.Dear Client,

Sanofi's termination action violates the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, specifically Sections 25F and 25N, which mandate conditions for termination or retrenchment. Termination without notice constitutes illegal termination and qualifies as an industrial dispute under Section 2A of the Act. Employees terminated unlawfully can directly raise an industrial dispute before the Industrial Tribunal or Labor Court within three years of termination. If you're classified as a workman under Section 2(s) of the Act, you should serve a legal notice to the company and then raise an industrial dispute with the State Government Industrial Tribunal. However, if you hold a managerial position, you should file a civil suit in the Civil Court for appropriate relief.
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Legal Counsel Vidhikarya

Responded 4 weeks ago

View All Answers

A.Dear Client,
Yes, the step adopted by Sanofi is illegal and unjustified under IDA 1947 for non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of Sec.25F & 25N of the Act. Termination without notice amounts to illegal termination and is defined as an industrial dispute under Section 2A of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 which also violated the mandatory provision of Sec.25F and 25N of the Act that prescribed certain conditions to comply with by the employer before termination/retrenchment of a workman/employee from the employment. In that scenario, the terminated employees/workmen can raise an industrial dispute directly before the Industrial Tribunal/Labor Court concerned for adjudication within three years from the date of termination/retrenchment. So, in the prevailing situation, if you are not holding the position of Manager/Supervisor but a workman as defined u/s.2(s) of the Industrial Dispute Act then after serving a legal notice to the Company, you should raise an Industrial dispute directly before the State Govt. Industrial Tribunal under Sec.2A of the I D Act. Otherwise, if you are holding the position of Manager/Administrative Officer in the Company, you have to file a civil suit before the Civil Court seeking appropriate relief in the matter. In case you need our expert service, feel free to contact our legal team to navigate the issue in the right way.

Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Read Related Answers

question iconSalary to scheme issue
Dear Client, In the given scenario, you have to go through the terms and conditions of your appointment letter that governs your relationship with the Company. If the appointment letter is silent on t...
question iconCar owner ship transfer
Dear Sir, The RC Owner will be held responsible if any accident took place as such it is better to get transfer the vehicle in the name of new purchaser.
question iconSRA property buying
Dear Client, In the absence of NOC from the authority(SRA) permitting the transfer of SRA property and registration paying the requisite stamp duty, and registration charges, all the transfers done ba...
question iconForgery of my signature
Dear Client, As per Section 463 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860: Whoever makes any false document or false electronic record or part of a document or electronic record, with intent to cause damage or i...
question iconSale of Property
Dear Client, If minor children receive property by inheritance or otherwise, according to the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act of 1956, even the father whose name appears in the property deed as th...