Menu
keyboard_backspace

Q. Partion

Placeholder image

Anonymous

posted 1 week ago

Q.Partion
If there is any law for equal share to give a lady who married before 70

Please do not provide your contact details here. We share your contact details on demand from the client.

Your Registration is Incomplete. Please Complete the Registration

Sorry, Your Profile is not activated.

Sorry, You can't respond to the Question as your account has been blocked.

Response is Required

Response should be with in 4294967295 characters

~ and ` characters are not allowed

Symbols are not allowed (Excluding #)

# Symbols is required

Kishan Dutt Kalaskar Retired Judge

Experience: 33 Year(s)

Responded 2 days ago

View All Answers

A. ) Dear Sir,
Partition suit is to be filed within 12 years as follows as such she cannot claim a share at this time.
==================================================================================
LIMITATION 12 YEARS FOR FILING SUIT FOR PARTITION
ARTICLE 110 OF LIMITATION ACT
When suit for partition will become barred by limitation?

Article 106 of the Limitation Act provides for period of 12 years limitation for a distributive share of the property of intestate against other person illegally charged with the duty of distributing the estate. Time begins under Article 106 when the legacy and share becomes payable or deliverable. Under Article 110 of schedule¬ I of the Limitation Act, suit has to be filed within 12 years by a person excluded from joint family property to enforce a right therein which time commences when the exclusion becomes known to the plaintiff. Even if it is the case of the plaintiff that he was deprived of property of the deceased father by first defendant is concerned,
Article¬106 of schedule ¬I to the Limitation Act would be attracted. Consent award was declared on 15th April 1986. Decree interms of consent award was passed in 1991 whereas suit is filed on 6th April 2011. Prayer (b) thus in my view is on the face of it barred by law of limitation.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 808 OF 2011

Naresh Lachmandas Aswani

Vs.

Haridas alias Hardas Lachmandas
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J.

Dated: 18th OCTOBER, 2013
Citation: 2016 (4) ALLMR 286

By an order dated 26th July, 2012 passed by this court, two issues were framed under section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in Notice of Motion NO. 1157 of 2011. In view of the issues framed under section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to be tried as jurisdictional issue, both parties were given opportunity to lead oral evidence on the jurisdictional issues framed by this court. Learned counsel have addressed on those issues which are answered by this court in the later part of the judgment.


ARTICLE 106 OF LIMITATION ACT MAY BE VIEWED online.

Reply is Required

Reply should be less than 4294967295 characters.

Helpful
Helpful
Share

Suneel Moudgil

Experience: 15 Year(s)

Responded 5 days ago

View All Answers

A. ) state complete facts to get a complete revert

Reply is Required

Reply should be less than 4294967295 characters.

Helpful
Helpful
Share
Talk to a Lawyer
Post Your Matter
Request Callback
Contact Us