Track Your Request
Track Your Request
+91-7604047602 Our Team About Us Legal Blog Free Legal Advice Login
Vidhikarya Text Logo



The fact ‘right to property’ is important for the freedom and development of a human being has remained constant through ages. In India, property laws have been framed based on the customary laws prevalent which was patriarchal in its very essence. Laws were amended time and again to accommodate the changes based on the changes in societal landscape.


A woman in a joint Hindu family, had a right to sustenance, but the control and ownership of property did not vest in her.  In a patrilineal system, descent through the male line, a woman, was not given a birth right in the family property like a son. However, during the British regime, the country  became politically and socially integrated, paving way for the earliest legislature bringing women into the scheme of inheritance which became The  Hindu  Law  of Inheritance Act, 1929. This Act, conferred inheritance rights on three female heirs, namely,   son's daughter, daughter's daughter and sister thereby creating  rights to property limited to these three heirs. In 1937, another landmark legislation conferring ownership rights on woman was The Hindu Women's Right to Property Act. This Act brought about revolutionary  changes in the Hindu Law of all schools, and brought changes not only in the law of coparcenary but also in the  law  of  partition,  alienation  of property, inheritance and adoption.

Current Legal Position

The Parliament of India enacted The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (HSA) to amend and codify the law relating to succession of property among Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs. This Act dealing with intestate succession among Hindus came into force on 17th June 1956. The Act operates on the underlined rule of the ‘principle of propinquity’ or in simple terms, the succession is carried out on the basis of the closeness of the relationship. Nevertheless, the deep and systematic discrimination in the laws governing the succession of property, was made evident.

The position under this Act was if a joint family gets divided, each male coparcener takes his share and only when the male coparcener dies, his widow gets a share of the deceased property. Thus the law by excluding the daughters from participating in coparcenary ownership (merely by reason of their sex) not only contributed to an inequity against women but also thereby oppressed   their right to equality. These circumstances paved way for an Amendment in 2005. The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 was enacted to remove gender discriminatory provisions in the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Under the amendment, the daughter of a coparcener shall by birth will become a coparcener in her own right in the same manner as the son. The daughter shall now have the same rights in the coparcenary property (ancestral property of the Hindu Undivided Family) as a son. The Hindu Succession Amendment Act of 2005 placed daughters on the same footing as a son with regard to inheritance of property.

The devolution of interest in coparcenary property is stated in Section 6 of HSA. The Amendment of 2005 has made both men and women as coparceners by birth  thus making all daughters (including married ones) coparceners in joint family property. Daughters will now get a share equal to that of sons at the time of the partition, just before the death of the father, and an equal share of the father's separate share. The Act paved way for equal distribution of undivided interests in coparcenary property. The daughter’s interest was therefore made pari passu with that of the sons’. However, the conferment of this right is  curtailed by the proviso to Section 6(1) which prevents daughters from claiming it if the coparcenary property was disposed of or partitioned on or before 20th December, 2004. Following the Amendment Act 2005, uncertainties arose on its actual effect. Ambiguities relating to the prospective or retrospective nature of Section 6 and whether it would only apply to females born after 2005 have been the subject to conflicting interpretations by the High Courts and the Supreme Court over the last decade and a half.

In the case of Prakash v. Phulavati (2016) 1 SCC 549, a Division Bench of the Supreme Court, observed Section 6 not to be retrospective in nature, and that “the rights under the amendment are applicable to living daughters of living coparceners as on September 9, 2005 irrespective of when such daughters are born.” The basic criteria for applying the 2005 amendment to daughters are two fold, firstly, it held that a daughter cannot reopen a partition that took place prior to December 20, 2004. Second, the amended section would apply to the daughter only if her father was alive on the date when the amendment came into force, that is, September 9, 2005. If the father who was a coparcener was not alive on the date the Amendment came into force, Section 6 would apply as it existed prior to the 2005 Amendment.

A daughter could only be entitled to coparcenary rights if both the daughter and her father were alive on the commencement date of the amendment (i.e) September 9, 2005. A marginally contrary view was taken by the Supreme Court in 2018 in Danamma Suman Surpur & Another v. Amar & Others, (2018) 3 SCC 343 and the judgment applied the amended Section 6 to give the daughter equal coparcenary rights although her father who died in 2001, prior to the 2005 amendment. Here, the court observed that the amended Section 6 stipulates that “on and from the commencement of the amended Act of 2005”, the daughter of a coparcener shall by birth become a coparcener in her own right, in the same manner as a son.” It noted that it was the factum of birth of the daughter that gave her coparcenary right, irrespective of when she was born, and that devolution of property is a later stage which occurs as a consequence of death of a coparcener.

In view of these conflicting decisions the question concerning the interpretation of Section 6 was referred to a three-judge bench in the case of Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (Civil Appeal No. Diary no.32601 of 2018)  delivered on 11th August, 2020 and the order is now a landmark decision. The Supreme Court affirmed the retroactive nature, effective from a date before it was approved of Section 6 and upheld the right of a daughter to be entitled to an equal share as a son in an ancestral property, irrespective of when she was born. The Court stated that though the coparcenary rights can be claimed, with effect from September 9, 2005, they confer benefits based on the antecedent event and the operation of the Amendment is based upon the coparcenary status that arose earlier, by birth. The Supreme Court overruled the previous judgments. The Supreme Court said that since the daughter acquired the coparcenary right by birth, it was not necessary for the father (coparcener) to be living as on September 9, 2005. The Court further emphasized on conferring right by birth therefore, “it is irrelevant that a coparcener whose daughter is conferred with the rights is alive or not”. Hence the date of the father's demise, within the meaning of the date of the enactment of the amendment (September 9, 2005), loses its importance and is no more relevant when partition takes place.


This decision has finally put to rest the issues surrounding the applicability and effect of Section 6, in that, it categorically reaffirms that a daughter of a coparcener shall by birth become a coparcener as a birth right in the same manner as that of the son. The retroactive effect of the Amendment would confer coparcenary rights on daughters living on its commencement date of Amendment (09.09.2005), irrespective of whether they were born prior to it and regardless of whether their father had died before the Amendment. This means the father need not be alive on September 9, 2005 for a daughter to claim rights over property.  The decision would open the doors to fresh litigation to those daughters who could not previously approach the courts and claim their coparcenary rights. This landmark ruling provides parity of rights among male and female coparceners of a joint Hindu family by granting women, though belatedly, their rightful share in ancestral property and embracing the constitutionally envisaged goal of gender justice.

Posted On : September 23, 2020

Written By :
Dr Gubbi's House of Justice

Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markService matters
As per Rule 21 of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964, (1) No Government servant shall enter into, or contract, a marriage with a person having a spouse living; and (2) No Government servant having a spouse living, shall enter into, or contract, a marriage with any person: Provided that the Central Government may permit a Government servant to enter into, or contract, any such marriage as is referred to in clause (1) or clause (2), if it is satisfied that - (a) such marriage is permissible under the personal law applicable to such Government servant and the other party to the marriage; and (b) there are other grounds for so doing. (3) A Government servant who has married or marries a person other than of Indian nationality shall forthwith intimate the fact to the Government. It is necessary to know whether you have done marriage with your partner or not.
question markpension
Dear Sir, If it is clear suicidal case no pension will be granted. I could have explained more if background is known to me. I am at your service if you visit my office. Please give me FIVE STAR if satisfied by my answers and you may approach me through Vidhikarya for further clarifications.
question markSetting up an online GK Quiz .
Dear Client, Yes, it will be totally legal to set up online GK quiz. There are many online quiz competition happening all around the world with the similar criteria as you mentioned. No liability will arise if you hold it in a fair manner. Thank You.
question markLaw Firm
Dear Client, Non-advocates can also be a proprietor of a law firm. However, they can not represent the firm in court. They can advertise or publish " advocate & Solicitors " as they are working under the capacity of the firm and not on personal limits. Thank you
question markHow to complain about lawyer
Dear Sir, BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA A complaint against an advocate has to be in the form of a petition. It has to be duly signed and verified as required under the Code of Civil Procedure. Click here to see the Advocates Act, 1961 Click here to see Parts I, II and III of the Bar Council of India Rules Click here to see Part IV of the Bar Council of India Rules (Rules on Legal Education) Click here to see Parts V, VI, VII, VIII and IX of the Bar Council of India Rules The complaint can be filed in English or in Hindi or in a regional language where the language has been declared to be a state language. In those cases where the complaint is in Hindi or in any other regional language, the State Bar Council shall translate the complaint in English whenever a disciplinary matter is sent to the Bar Council of India as per the Advocates Act. Every complaint shall be accompanied by the fees prescribed in the Bar Council of India Rules. Removal of Defects and Request for Particulars in a Complaint The Secretary of the Bar Council may require the complainant to pay the prescribed fees if the proper fee has not been paid. He can also call the complainant to remove any defects and call for the particulars or copies of the complaint or other documents as may be considered necessary. On a complaint being found to be in order, it shall be registered and placed before the Bar Council for such order as it may deem fit to pass. Withdrawal and Settlement of Complaints No matter taken up by the State Bar Council (either suo motu or on a complaint made by other parties) for misconduct of advocates shall be dropped solely by reason of its having been withdrawn, settled or otherwise compromised, or because the complainant does not want proceed with the enquiry. Before referring a complaint for misconduct of an advocate to one of its Disciplinary Committees to be specified by it, the Bar Council may require a complainant to furnish further and better particulars or may call for comments from the advocate complained against, within a time to be fixed by it. Show Cause Notice Once the Bar Council has referred the complaint to a disciplinary committee, the Registrar should expeditiously send a notice to the advocate. The notice will ask the concerned advocate to show cause within a specified date, on the complaint made against him and to submit the statement of defence, documents and affidavits in support of the defence. It will also further inform him that in case of his non-appearance on the fixed date of hearing, the matter shall be heard and determined in his absence. Appearance usually includes appearance by an advocate or through a duly authorised representative. Time of Enquiry The Chairman of the Disciplinary Committee will fix the date, hour, and place of the enquiry. This date will not ordinarily be later than thirty days from the receipt of the reference. The Registrar has to give notice of the date, hour and place to the complainant or other person aggrieved, the advocate concerned, and the Attorney General or the Additional Solicitor General of India or the Advocate General, as the case may be. Notices The notices shall, subject to necessary modification, be in Form Nos. E-1 and E-2. It shall be sent to the advocates appearing for the parties. Notice to a party not appearing by the advocate shall be sent to the address as furnished in the complaint or in the grounds of appeal. The cost of the notices shall be borne by the complainant unless the Disciplinary Committee otherwise directs. The notices may be sent ordinarily through messenger or by registered post and served on the advocate or the party concerned or his agent or other person as provided for in Order V of the Civil Procedure Code. Notice may also be sent for service through any Civil Court. Where the notice sent to any party cannot be served using the normal methods listed above, it may be served by affixing a copy in some conspicuous place in the office of the Bar Council, and also upon some conspicuous part of the house (if any) in which the party concerned is known to have last resided or had his office. Appearance and Witnesses Parties can appear in person or by an advocate who should file a vakalatnama giving the name of the Bar Council in which he is enrolled, his residential address, telephone number if any, and his address for service of notices. A Senior Advocate is entitled to appear with another advocate who has filed a vakalatnama. The Bar Council or its Disciplinary Committee may at any stage of a proceeding appoint an advocate to appear as Amicus Curiae. Such advocate may be paid such fee as the Council or the Committee may decide. Excepting when the Committee has otherwise directed, service on the advocate shall be deemed to be sufficient service on the parties concerned, even if copies of the notices are in addition sent to the parties, whether the parties have or have not been served. Unless otherwise indicated, where more than one Advocate appears for the same party, it is sufficient to serve the notice on any of them. Ex-parte Proceedings If, in an enquiry on a complaint received, either the complainant or the respondent does not appear before the Disciplinary Committee in spite of service of notice, the Committee may proceed ex-parte or direct fresh notice to be served. Any such order for proceeding ex-parte may be set aside on sufficient cause being shown, when an application is made supported by an affidavit, within 60 days of the passing of the ex-parte order. The provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply to this sub-rule. Proceedings and Exhibits The Disciplinary Committee shall hear the Attorney General or the Additional Solicitor General of India or the Advocate General, as the case may be or their advocate and parties or their advocates. The matters can be heard and determined on documents and affidavits. Unless the committee is of the opinion that it should be in the interest of justice to permit cross-examination of the deponents or to take oral evidence, in which case the procedure for the trial of civil suits shall as far as possible be followed. On every document admitted in evidence, the following endorsement shall be made which shall be signed by the Chairman or any member of the Committee: The Disciplinary Committee of Bar Council of ………………… Exhibit No ………………………… Date of Document………………………… Produced by …………………………… Date ………………………………. Signature of …………….. The exhibits shall be marked as follows: – a. Those of the complainant as C1,C2, etc. b. Those of Respondent as R1, R2,etc. c. Those of Disciplinary Committee as D1, D2, etc. The Disciplinary Committee may at any stage direct the parties or their advocates to furnish such further and better particulars, as it considers necessary. Recording of Evidence Any member of the Committee or any other person authorised by the committee shall record the evidence given before the Disciplinary Committee preferably in English. The evidence so recorded shall be signed by the Chairman or by any other member of the committee if the Chairman is not there. In the case where the records of evidence are in any other language than English and the same has to be sent to the Bar Council of India or its Disciplinary Committee, then the same has to be translated into English. Such a translation thereof in English has to be made by a person nominated by Committee or Registrar certifying the same to be true copy should also be sent. Record of Proceedings Every Disciplinary Committee shall make a record of its day-to-day proceedings. The Registrar of the Disciplinary Committee shall maintain a case diary setting out shortly in order of date, all relevant information concerning the date of filing, the date for hearing and despatch. The case diary shall also have the details of service of the notices on the parties or the Advocates or the Attorney General or the Additional Solicitor General or the advocate General as the case may be, of statements or petitions filed and/or of their order, and of other proceedings in the matter before the Committee. Dropping of Enquiries on Certain Grounds In the case of the death of the complainant during the enquiry proceedings (and if there is no representative who is willing to conduct the case), the Disciplinary Committee may having regard to the allegations made in the complaint and the evidence available, make a suitable order either to proceed with the enquiry or to drop it. In the case of an enquiry against one advocate only, on his death the Disciplinary Committee shall record the fact of such death and drop the proceedings. Where the enquiry is against more than one advocate, on the death of one of them, the Disciplinary Committee may continue the enquiry against the other advocate unless it decides otherwise. No disciplinary enquiry shall be dropped solely by reason of its having been withdrawn, settled or otherwise compromised, or that the complainant does not want to proceed with the enquiry. Dress Unless otherwise permitted, counsel appearing before any of the Disciplinary Committees of the State Bar Council or Bar Council of India shall appear in court dress. Findings and Judgment The finding of the majority of the members of the Disciplinary Committee shall be the finding of the Committee. The reason given in support of the finding may be given in the form of a judgment. If there is a difference of opinion, any member dissenting shall be entitled to record his dissent giving his own reason. It shall be competent for the Disciplinary Committee to award such costs as it thinks fit. The Registrar of the Disciplinary Committee shall send, free of charge to each of the parties in the proceedings, a certified copy of the final order or judgment. The date of an Order made by the Disciplinary Committee shall be the date on which it is first received in the office of the Bar Council after all the members have signed it. For the purpose of limitation, the date of the Order shall be the date on which the contents of the signed Order are communicated to the parties affected. Pending Matters Certified copies of the records of a case pending before the Disciplinary Committee may be granted to the parties or to their counsel on an application made in that behalf and on payment of the prescribed fee. This is mandatory unless the Committee has directed otherwise. The Secretary of a State Bar Council shall send to the Secretary of the Bar Council of India, quarterly statements of the complaints received and the stage of the proceedings before the State Bar Council and Disciplinary Committees. The Secretary of the Bar Council of India may call for further statements and particulars as he considers necessary. The Secretary of every State Bar Council shall furnish such particulars and send such statements as may be considered necessary by the Secretary of the Bar Council of India for these purposes and send them all to the records of proceedings that stand transferred. The date of receipt of the complaint or the date of the initiation of the proceedings at the instance of the State Bar Council shall be the date on which the State Bar Council refers the case for disposal to its Disciplinary Committee. Withdrawal of Proceedings Where a State Bar Council makes a report, the Secretary of the State Bar Council shall send to the Secretary of the Bar Council of India, all the records of the proceedings, along with the report. An application by a person interested in the withdrawal of a proceeding shall sign the same. It shall set out the necessary facts supported by an affidavit and accompanied by the fee prescribed. For making an order on an application of a party or otherwise for withdrawal of an application, the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India may: a. Call for a report of the Disciplinary Committee seized of the proceedings; b. Issue notice to the respondent; c. Require the parties to file such statements as it considers necessary; d. Call for the records of the proceedings; and e. Examine any witnesses. In the proceedings before the Disciplinary Committee of Bar Council of India, the parties may appear in person or by an advocate who shall file a vakalatnama. On consideration of the report of a State Bar Council or otherwise, the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India shall pass such orders as it considers proper. Appeal to the Bar Council of India An appeal to the Council from the State Bar Council shall be in the form of a memorandum in writing. If the appeal is in a language other than English, it shall be accompanied by a translation in English. In every appeal, all persons who were parties to the original proceedings alone, shall be impleaded as parties. In an appeal by the advocate against an order for misconduct, in case of death of the complainant, the legal representatives of the complainant shall be made parties. An appeal may be presented by the appellant or his advocate or by his recognised agent in the office of the Bar Council of India. It can also be sent by registered post, so as to reach the Secretary, Bar Council of India. The appeal has to be presented on or before the last day of limitation. Any appeal may be admitted after the period of limitation if the appellant satisfies the Disciplinary Committee that he has sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within such a period. Any such application for condonation of delay shall be supported by an affidavit. The memorandum of appeal shall contain necessary particulars as in Form G. The memorandum of appeal shall state when the order was communicated to the appellant and how it is in time. Along with the memorandum of appeal, the appellant shall file: a. The certified copy of the order appealed against, signed by the Registrar of the Disciplinary Committee, or b. (i) If there is only one respondent, five additional copies of the memorandum of appeal and of the order appealed against. (ii) If there is more than one Respondent, such number of additional copies as may be necessary. All copies shall be certified as true copies by the appellant or by his counsel. Every memorandum of appeal shall be accompanied by the prescribed fees in cash. If the papers filed in an appeal are not in order, the Registrar shall require the appellant to remove such defects within a specified time. Allocation of Matters in Appeal The Chairman of the Executive Committee or in his absence the Vice-Chairman of the Executive Committee) or such other member authorised in this behalf by the Council) shall have the power to allocate matters relating to the Disciplinary Committee. Sometimes the Council allots a particular case to any one particular Disciplinary Committee. Any matter allotted to a particular Disciplinary Committee, which has not been heard, may be reallocated to a different Disciplinary Committee. Interim Orders in Appeal The Chairman of any Disciplinary Committee shall have powers to issue interim orders on urgent matters which may be placed before him by the Registrar. Time and Date in Appeal Subject to any resolution of the Bar Council of India relating to the places of hearing, the Chairman of the Disciplinary Committee concerned shall fix the date, hour and place for the hearing of the appeal. Exhibits and Records in Appeal The appellant shall be required to file six typed sets of the papers properly paged and indexed, if there is only one respondent. In case of multiple respondents, as many more sets as there may be number of respondents, for the use of the Disciplinary Committee and by the other parties and for the record. The papers to be filed are: – a. The complaint and the statement in the defence of the advocate, b. The oral and documentary evidence and such other papers on which parties intend to rely, c. Any other part of the record as may be directed by the Committee. Where any of the above papers is in a language other than English, English translations thereof will be filed. The respondent shall, if he so desires, or if so called upon, file six sets of typed papers of any part of the record on which he intends to rely. He shall also file English translations of papers that are not in English. Notice of Hearing in Appeal The Registrar shall give notices to the parties, informing them of the date, the time and the place of the hearing of the appeal. A copy of the memorandum of appeal shall be sent to the respondent along with the notice of the appeal. Withdrawal of Appeal No appeal filed against an order of punishment of an advocate shall be permitted to be withdrawn on account of settlement or compromise or adjustment of the claim against the advocate. Every appeal filed by or against an advocate shall abate on the death of the advocate so far as he is concerned. Records from State Bar Councils The Registrar shall issue notice to the State Council concerned for the complete records to be sent to the Council. The Registrar of the State Council concerned shall send along with the records a list containing particulars under the following columns and comply with such other directions as may be issued. Serial number of document Date of document Description of document Page number Application for Stay An application for stay shall be made by the applicant with at least five copies of the application, and the affidavit and as many additional copies as there are respondents. Where the application is not in English, five copies with translation in English shall also be filed. In every application for stay made to the Council, the applicant shall state if any application has been made to the State Council and the orders on the same. Before a matter is allotted to a Disciplinary Committee the registrar may obtain orders on applications for interim stay or other urgent applications from the Chairman of any of the Disciplinary Committees. The orders passed shall be communicated to the parties and to the Secretary of the Bar Council concerned. The Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India shall exercise all the powers exercised by the Civil Court or Court of Appeal under C.P.C. I could have explained more if background is known to me. I am at your service if you visit my office. Please give me FIVE STAR if satisfied by my answers and you may approach me through Vidhikarya for further clarifications.

Please enter the text



Send your queries to

[email protected]
Consult Administrative Law Lawyers from your City!
Post Your Matter
Post Your Matter to connect with the Lawyer online
Call 7604047602 for any assistance
Our Team
Lawyer Login
Be a Partner

Download the Lawyers App on

Vidhikarya App on Android Platform
Contact Details
[email protected]
No. 2, First Floor, Subharaj
Plot No. CE/1/C/19, Premises No. 18-0208,
Action Area- 1, New Town