Demonetising India : Time for India to emerge as a Cashless Economy.


Posted On : April 17, 2017
Listen to this article

Table of Contents

The Demonetisation Step At 8 p.m. on the 8th of November, 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, declared the demonetisation of the currency notes of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000, rendering them invalid as legal tender, through a live-telecast. The Indian currency has been demonetised twice before in 1946 and 1978, however the recent announcement came as a shock to the Indian population. The government cited reasons such as curtailing the circulation of ‘black money’ and tax evasions in the economy. The populace was greatly inconvenienced due to the non-availability of cash, on the 8th of November; the transactions in those denominations of currency amounted to 14.2 lakh crores, around 86% of total cash transactions. The move was further led by non-ending queues outside banks and political discussions. Reason behind the drastic move The main reason that governs the strong move of Demonetisation taken by the Government is the pervasiveness of black money and tax evasion in the Indian Economy. The main goal was to bring into view the unaccounted income and attack malpractices like circulation of fake currency and dodgy funds, corruption, red-tapism, human trafficking, money laundering, terrorism etc. as such are primarily funded through high value currency. Evaluating Cashless India: Schemes by Government to promote digital payments. Cash is the life-blood of the Indian economy. Indeed demonetisation has painful been painful yet it has far reaching positive implications for the Indian economy. Several schemes have been launched by the Government for promoting the digital transactions for instance online platforms like BHIM, M-Pesa, RuPay, toll discounts etc for making the things much easier. Digitalisation serves as a backbone in tracing unaccounted income, illegal transactions as well as tax evasions. Since then there has been search and raids by the Income Tax Department and estimates show that approx. Rs 3185 Crore of undisclosed income has been found while the no. is still on count. Overall there are almost 22 schemes launched by Government which is a master stroke in Indian history. Positive aspects: Why India should grow as a cashless economy.
  • Curbing Black Money
Black money acts as a poison and weakens the roots of economic system of the country. A study conducted by Indian Statistical Institute ascertains that the amount of black money in India approx Rs 3 lakh crore while that of fake currency is Rs 400 crore. However, with the advent of digital transactions it would become easier to trace black money and other illegal transactions. With the single stroke of digitalization, the circulation of black money and fake currencies will come to an end.
  • Bank Deposits
Cash is the life blood of Indian economy and 86% of the currency circulation in India was mostly in form of cash. Demonetisation made the people to arrive at the bank’s door and deposit their Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes. RBI announced that banks have received approx. Rs 5.12 trillion of deposits until 18th November which can be helpful in boosting GDP. Moreover, with digitalization, it would become easier to conduct day to day transactions.
  • Curbing terrorism, naxalites and north-east insurgency
These groups are the ones which have been worst sufferers from the move. Demonetisation curbs out the origin of hawala transactions and fake currency which in turn is the main source of funding of these groups. Hawala is a method of transferring money without any actual money movement. Hawala route is used as a means to facilitate money laundering and terror financing. According to an India Today report, one of the hawala operators in Mumbai has destroyed currency notes worth about Rs 500 crores.
  • Government finances
With the advent of demonetisation and digitalization, the income tax collection will increase as every form of money whether accounted or unaccounted will make its way into the Banks through formal regulated channels. This in turn will increase the Government Funds, which can later on be used for the feasible purposes. Conclusion There are social, cultural and infrastructural drawbacks that hinder the move of India towards a cashless economy. A nation where cash is the life blood of the economy makes it even more difficult as most of the people do not have knowledge of digital transaction as mode of payment while the rest choose to abstain from learning this change. There is a need of strata of policies and safeguards by the Government to promote the wave of cashless economy and to create a positive aspect of the concept on the whole nation. Meanwhile it is also our duty to accept the change and transform our thinking to welcome a bright future, beneficial for all. Countries like Sweden, Belgium and Kenya have made steps to become cashless societies so why not India. It’s time for India to welcome the dawn of new cashless century.
Written By:
Siddhi Srivastava

Siddhi Srivastava


Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markDenied Boarding due to pet 2 Response(s)
Dear Client, From the contents of your query, it does not transpire what kind of releif you need for the cause of embarrassment and harassment that incurs financial loss to you for the deficiency in service on the part of Air India. However, in the given situation, a complaint u/s.35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 may be filed against the Air India for deficiency in service claiming compensation for harassment and mental agony. You need to consult with an Advocate for guidance and steps.
question markHospital avoiding cashless treatment 1 Response(s)
Dear Client, In the given situation, bring the matter to the notice of the Grievance Cell of the concerned Insurance Company endorsing a copy to the insurance regulatory authority, IRDIA. In case, no suitable reply is received or received a reply denying your claim, then file a complaint before the Dist. Consumer Commission against the concerned hospital and the Insurance Company on the grounds of deficiency and unfair trade practices claiming the entire medical treatment cost incurred for the treatment of the insured patient along with compensation of harassment. Claim should be filed within two years from the date of cause of action, i.e, the date of rejection of the claim. Reach out to an Advocate for guidance and steps.
question markHospital asking entire bill amount in cash after Cashless Insurance claim 5 Response(s)
Please check with insurance company why rejected your bill , cashless bill settled with in 3 or 4 months if there is any objection they will inform you on your official mail I'd and specifically mention reason why rejecting bill. Or they have approved the amount also marked you on official mail I'd. You can approach your HR department for bill approval. If your medical policy is individually policy means on corporate policy . Same above mention communication on your registered mail id. If all above mention not work out you can file a case
question markCashless Claim rejected stating non-disclosure of pre-existing disease 1 Response(s)
Respected sir/ma'am, Kindly look into the case of Religare Health Ins. Co. Ltd. vs Harwant Singh And Another on 8 February, 2021. You can file an application in the STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Section 19 of the General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act, 1972 states that it shall be the duty of every Insurance Company to carry on general insurance business so as to develop it to the best advantage of the community. The denial of medical expenses reimbursement is utterly arbitrary on the ground that diseases, in question, were pre-existing disease. It is mere an excuse to escape liability and is not bona fide intention of the insurance company. Fairness and non-arbitrariness are considered as two immutable pillars supporting the equity principle, an unshakable threshold of State and public behavior. Any policy in the realm of insurance company should be informed, fair and non-arbitrary. When the insurance policy has exclusions/conditions to repudiate the claim or limit the liability, the same must be specifically brought to the notice of the insured and are required to be got signed to show that such exclusions and conditions have been brought to his/her notice. 22. The need for interpreting a contract always arises in two situations, (i) when a gap is needed to be filled in the contract and (ii) an ambiguity is needed to be resolved in the contract, then to find out correct intention of the contract, spirit behind it is required to be considered. Normally, the insurance policy is a contract of adhesion in which other party is left with hardly any bargaining power as compared to the insurer. Insurance contracts are standard form contracts and are drafted by the insurance company and as such, insurance company is at higher footing than the insured. The benefit of such clause, as exclusion clause, would go to the insured unless the same is explained in clear terms by the insurer. In such circumstances, the tribunal would be more oriented towards the interpretation which goes against the party who has inserted/drafted the disputed clause in the agreement/contract. The adjudicating authority is required to look into whether the intention of the party is to exclude or limit liability has been appropriately explained to the other party or not. This Commission while interpreting insurance agreement is to honour the intention of the parties, who have signed the agreement. Even if the agreement had general exclusion/condition for misrepresentation still fraudulent misrepresentation and non-disclosure may not be there. The innocent and negligent misrepresentations are to be ignored.
question markFIR filed against 376,354a,354,452,323,509,506,427 2 Response(s)
Dear Madam, You may go to the office Higher Police Officers or to the Press and see that guy is arrested immediately and he wish to cheat you.
Expert Lawyers in Others