Identity of main accused
5 years ago
I am an accused in case...main accused A1 is absconding from date one...now trial is over and is posted for arguements...in the fir ....main accused belongs to Andhra Pradesh(a.p address)...but in the charge sheet he belongs to Kerala(Kerala address given)...prosecution has not produced any evidence to prove that both are the same..i.o is not examined because he is no more....if accused belongs to a.p then he has no connection with other accused....if he belongs to Kerala he had not committed any crime..police has not submitted any explanation for this ...as of now there are two different persons....identity of actual offender is not proved.....I want to argue the case myself...can I bring this point at the time of arguement?
Deepak Yashwantrao Bade
Responded 5 years ago
Sushama
Responded 5 years ago
Your facts is not clear because you specifically not mentioned that under which section trial was going on and accused 1is absconded.
Further you contact any local lawyer to handle your case.
Johnson Thangiah
Responded 5 years ago
Long absence of the accused leads to split of the case.The trial court has the power to split the case U/S 317(2) Crpc.You having a option of free legal aid assistance and use it.The IO witness may be marked from another person.
Your question is not clear and mention the offences is must.Before the conclusion we have to read the full charge sheet.
ROBERT D ROZARIO
Responded 5 years ago
GANESH SHARMA
Responded 5 years ago