Get Free Legal Advice from Top Expert Lawyers

Dear Client,

the MRO's rejection is legally incorrect because central government rules clearly state that salary and agricultural income cannot be counted toward the ₹8 lakh OBC Non-Creamy Layer limit.

Since your IT salary and farm earnings are excluded by law, and you have no business or rental income, your son is fully entitled to the certificate. To fix this quickly before the IIT deadlines, you must file an urgent appeal with the (RDO) or approach the High Court for a fast emergency o

Dear client,
The absence of a driving licence does not automatically defeat your brother’s MACT claim, although the insurer may raise the issue as a policy violation, and the Tribunal will decide its effect based on the facts and evidence. Since he suffered multiple fractures, surgery and substantial treatment, compensation can be claimed for medical expenses, pain and suffering, loss of income, future treatment, attendant/conveyance expenses and, if permanent disability is established, loss o

Dear Client,

Installing a roof luggage carrier (roof rack) on a private car is generally legal in India, provided it complies with the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. Under Section 52 of the Act, the installation must not amount to an unauthorized alteration of the vehicle's original specifications, while Rule 93 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules requires that the vehicle's overall dimensions remain within the prescribed limits.

The luggage must be secu

Dear Client,

Based on the facts you have stated, your prospects for appointment as a Nursing Officer through AIIMS NORCET appear favorable because you had a valid driving licence, RC, and insurance, the injured person received compensation through the MACT proceedings, the offence under Section 125B BNS (old Section 338 IPC) was compounded through a lawful compromise, and the offence under Section 281 BNS (old Section 279 IPC) was quashed by the High Court.

Since there does not appear to be

Dear Sir,

If the child or the parents file a compensation claim, the absence of insurance means there is no insurer to satisfy the award. Depending on the facts, the driver and the person responsible for the vehicle's use may face personal liability. As child received only simple injuries then court will award only small amount as compensation.

Already answered. Please don't repeat the same question.

They may ask for compensation, but they cannot legally compel payment by threatening to file an FIR. If a cognizable offence has occurred, they are entitled to approach the police irrespective of any settlement.

Dear Client

If an FIR has already been registered, you may follow up with the Investigating Officer to ascertain the status of the investigation and ensure that your medical records, injury reports, and other evidence are placed on record. If there is undue delay or inaction, you may approach the senior police authorities seeking expeditious investigation.

If you have sustained injuries due to the rash and negligent driving of the other vehicle, you may also be entitled to claim compensation b

Dear Client,

If the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) has awarded Ra.8 lakhs against the driver and owner of the uninsured vehicle, the next step is to file an execution petition before the same Tribunal for recovery of the awarded amount. During execution proceedings, the Tribunal can issue notices to the judgment debtors (driver and owner), direct disclosure of their assets, and order attachment and sale of movable or immovable properties, bank accounts, salary, or other recoverable asset

Dear Client

Once the MACT award has been passed, you can initiate execution proceedings against the driver and vehicle owner for recovery of the awarded amount. In the execution case, the Court can order attachment and sale of their movable and immovable properties, bank accounts, salary, or other attachable assets.

If the judgment debtors are claiming that they have no assets, you may seek directions from the Executing Court requiring them to disclose their assets and financial particulars on

Dear client,

If you have received a summons for a drunk driving case in Pune, the main issue is usually against the person who was actually driving the vehicle, not necessarily the registered owner of the car. So even if the car is in your brother’s name, liability for drunken driving primarily falls upon the driver at the time of the incident. Under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, drunk driving cases are generally filed based on the breath analyser report, medical examination, and police chall