Vidhikarya Logo
Callback Request
Call Back Request
Track Your Request
Track Your Request
+91-7604047602 Legal Blog For Students Free Legal Advice Lawyer Login


Civil litigation is often dreaded by victims owing to the enormous delay in proceedings. But, effective use of certain simple tools to cut short delay would benefit the justice delivery.

Litigants are wary of delay in civil Court proceedings. There exists a general notion that a civil suit may take years, even decades together. Here, there are many tools strewn across the Civil Procedure Code which enable the victims of delayed justice achieve their ends and cross the stages of a civil suit quickly. One among such tools is the discovery of evidence through interrogatories


Discovery of evidence by interrogatories are provided for under Sec. 30 and Order 11 of the CPC. The meaning of interrogatories may not be directly clear, but the form of interrogatories portrayed in Appendix C to the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 provide us a fair idea. To put it simply it is a list of questions, in the form of a questionnaire which is served on the other party/parties. It is also notable that the interrogatories in Appendix C are in the form of leading questions.


  • The leave of the Court must be obtained.
  • An affidavit must be filed seeking the leave of the Court as provided for in Form 1 of Appendix C to the CPC, which must be accompanied by the interrogatories.
  • A separate order must be obtained in case a party wishes to deliver more than one set of interrogatories to the same party
  • An affidavit to answer the interrogatories must be filed within ten days from the date of service, or within such other time as the Court may allow.
  • The interrogatories need not be answered personally, but may be answered through a recognized agent.
  • Any one or more of the answers to the interrogatories may be used in trial as evidence.
  • Interrogatories which do not relate to any matters or the question in the suit shall be deemed irrelevant, even if they might be admissible in the cross examination of the witnesses.
  • A interrogatory may be set aside on the ground that they are exhibited unreasonably or vexatiously.
  • An interrogatory may be struck out on the ground that they are prolix, oppressive, unnecessary or scandalous.
  • An application for the above purpose may be made within seven days after the service of the interrogatories.
  • Alternatively, an affidavit for answer can contain objections to the interrogatories on the ground that they are scandalous, not bona fide and immaterial at that stage of suit.
  • If a party interrogated omits to answer, or answers insufficiently, the party interrogated may apply to the Court requiring the interrogated party to answer the omitted question, or to further answer the question which is insufficiently answered.


Interrogatories are an essential tool to save time and protect the adversary against delay. The evidence stage is an important part of civil proceedings, and consumes a lot of time. This is primarily because, the presence of the parties and witnesses are necessary. Further, there may be documents which have to be submitted the Court which requires time. But, when the deposition required to be taken against the opposite party is simply recorded without the presence of the party, but has the same value as such, it may halve the time consumed in the evidence stage. It is notable that the limitation to answer the interrogatories is ten days.

It must be noted that the affidavit submitted in response to interrogatories have huge evidentiary value. Most lawsuits rest upon one straight question, if the opposite party put to answer, will make him lose his morale, as he may not have a direct answer. For example, in a case for bare injunction, the plaintiff is not entitled to the remedy if he does not have the possession. Such a straight question, if posed by the defendant, will make the plaintiff reconsider the feasibility of the lawsuit in entirety.

The mens legis behind this provision is the curtailing of unnecessary costs and expenditure.  The appearance of the parties for simple questions may be unthinkable in many cases. 

Posted On : July 18, 2020

Written By :
Viswanath M K
Viswanath M K
D.O.E. : 8/2014
Chennai |

Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markI wanted to give new surname to my son which is not there in our family
Hi, At the time of birth, the name of the son should be considered to be the original name. however, there are a number of ways in which a name can be changed most popularly used method is filing for an affidavit and then publicationin a local newspaper. There is no bar from changing the name however if there is a particular custom in your family which prevents the same then you have to contest that in the court of law. Thank you.
question markwe invested in another company
Hi, You can approach the court. You have right to get profits based on the amount you have invested or as per the conditions of the contract. If there is any breech, you can consult a lawyer and sue against the company. Please rate my answer Thank You
question markTransfer of name in Bhada Salami after my father's death
Hello sir It would be advised to contact a local lawyer with understanding of local laws. A person having understanding of local laws could be of more help. Thanks Please rate if you find this advice helpful.
question markSame property sold to two people by 2 brothers
It has not been specified that whether by virtue of registered Partition Deed property division was done between X and Y or not. If there is no registered Partition Deed, then Y had filed Partition Suit against X . During the Partition Suit, without taking Court's leave the parties cannot transfer or make change of the nature and character of the property but during the pendency of Partition Suit,Y had sold 10 acres to M when Y was actually challenging the Ownership of 8 acres and it seems that Y had done so without taking any leave from the Court because otherwise M will required to be added as a party therein. It is necessary to scrutinize the documents and Order passed in that litigation because if it was Partition Suit,then after declaration of property share through Preliminary Decree,the specific portions are to be demarcated by Final Decree. It is necessary to clarify on your part that after death of Y whether his legal heirs were substituted in that Suit, whether that Suit is still pending or disposed of, whether M had taken any step to joint in that Suit as necessary party, whether M had taken any step for recording his name in Revenue records after such purchase. Until and unless relevant information with supportive documents are provided, proper legal opinion cannot be given.
question markCan ancestral property provided to father through family division be given to only one son
A property is considered ancestral if it remains unpartitioned for last four lineage and if the property is ancestral then no legal heir and heiress can be deprived of that. However,if the father got that property through family partition,then his property will become self acquired and then the father can transfer it in registered manner to any body. Until and unless the entire fact of the case be specified, it becomes difficult to give proper legal opinion.
Expert Lawyers in Civil
D.O.E. : 6/1986
View Full Profile
D.O.E. : 11/1983
View Full Profile
D.O.E. : 2/2008
View Full Profile
D.O.E. : 3/2013
View Full Profile
D.O.E. : 11/2007
View Full Profile

Please enter the text



Send your queries to

[email protected]
Consult Civil Lawyers from your City!
Post Your Matter
Post Your Matter to connect with the Lawyer online
Call 7604047602 for any assistance
Symbol for Lawyer
Find Lawyers by Location

Download the Clients App on

Vidhikarya App on Android Platform

Contact Details

[email protected]
505-A, Terminus Building,
Newtown, Action Area I,
Kolkata 700156

Download the Lawyers App on

Vidhikarya App on Android Platform

Certified by Startup India, DPIIT


Payment secured by :

PayUMoney PayPal net banking
visa master maestro
Celebrating 5 years