90,000+ Legal Questions Answered

To defend the False Charges by getting certified my recordings To defend the False Charges by getting certified my recordings

3 years ago

I am the Accused who is falsely implicated u/s 332,353 of IPC by the Police Constable (because of his Ego problem or Maybe monetarily settled with bank Officials, when I denied him to show my Smartphone's Audio and Video Recordings against the Bank staffs telling him that he is not a right person & I will only show all to his seniors). So please tell me Can Accused ask for Evidences like CCTV footages, Call Records, etc which I had asked under RTI act, 2005 but denied by Both Bank and Police ? And how can I get Certificate for all my electronic Evidences u/s 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ?

Ayantika Mondal @ Prime Legal

Responded 3 years ago

A.Hi,
Being part of the Right to Life, the Right to Fair Trial has been codified under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950, and further detailed in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). Section 207 of the CrPC talks about the supply of “documents” to the accused to enable him to prepare his defense. It mandates that the accused be provided copies of the police report, the FIR recorded under Section 154 CrPC, confessional statements etc.

Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 elaborates that a “document” means any matter expressed or described upon any substance by means of letters, figures or marks, or by more than one of those means, intended to be used, or which may be used, for the purpose of recording that matter.
Therefore yes, the accused has a right to get a copy of such evidence. Only a magistrate can decide against it.

If you like my answer, please give a good rating
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Anik

Responded 3 years ago

View All Answers
A.Hi,
False cases can be quashed by the High Court under section 482 CrPC. Persons making such claims can be punished under Section 482 CrPC.
The police have discretionary powers to not share information regarding ongoing cases. A local lawyer can assist you with this.
If you found this helpful, please rate us.
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Ayantika Mondal @ Prime Legal

Responded 3 years ago

A.Hi,
Details of ongoing investigations are generally not published as they could hamper the prosecution. A lawyer will have to assist you with this, an application must be made for the same over the course of the proceedings. False cases can be quashed by the High Court under Section 482 CrPC.
If you found this helpful, please rate us.
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Read Related Answers

question iconReopening of uncontested disposed criminal case immediately
Dear Sir, Once convicted on plea it cannot be reopened but may seek enhancement of punishment both by way of fine and imprisonment. You have to approach higher Court.
question iconVague and illegal order passed by Magistrate on recall application
Dear Client, A criminal revision petition challenging the order of the subordinate Court may be filed under Section 397 of the Cr. PC either before the Session Court or the High Court. According to A...
question iconMinor aged 17 has eloped with a boy
Dear Client This can be a serious issue if a complaint is lodged with the police as the girl is still a minor and apart from other Sections of the Indian Penal Code the boy can be even booked (a possi...
question iconRegarding the intimate chatting
Dear Client, Firstly, engaging in solicitation for sexual services, including negotiating pricing with a sex worker, is illegal in many jurisdictions, including India. Therefore, if you have engaged...
question iconnew criminal laws-applicability to existing on-going cases
Dear sir, It goes to show that whenever new laws are introduced it cannot be Retrospective effect. It will be effect from Prospective only as indicated in new enactment.