information
4 years ago
We have lived on a private land for 45 years, but we do not have any documents, but do we have any right now on this land.
Ayantika Mondal @ Prime Legal
Responded 4 years ago
A.You need to follow the legal formalities to regularised the property. Declaration suits may be the best option. Please approach a lawyer with all the documents, bills to process with the same.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
A.Dear Sir,
You are so negligent even now. Created documents like affidavits of neighbors, Panchanama/Mahajars from Revenue departments so and so for the then claim it as owner on the principle of adverse possession.
=================================================
ADVERSE POSSESSION
In other words, whether Article 65 of the Act only enables a person to set up a plea of adverse possession as a shield as a defendant and such a plea cannot be used as a sword by a plaintiff to protect the possession of immovable property or to recover it in case of dispossession
Plea Of Adverse Possession – A Shield As Well As A Sword, Clarifies Supreme Court
https://www.mondaq.com/india/trials-appeals-compensation/844224/plea-of-adverse-possession-a-shield-as-well-as-a-sword-clarifies-supreme-court
There are many judgments and the recent one is as follows:
======================================================================
Protest within 12 years or lose property to squatter
======================================================================
ONE THE ABOVE FORMULA THE OPPOSITE PARTY LOSE ITS CASE.
If a person does not protest someone illegally occupying his property for 12 years, then the squatter would get ownership rights over that property, the Supreme Court has ruled.
A bench of Justices R K Agrawal and A M Sapre said if a person proved actual, peaceful and uninterrupted possession of a property owned by another for more than 12 years, “a case of adverse possession can be held to be made out which, in turn, results in depriving the true owner of his ownership rights in the property and vests ownership rights of the property in the person who claims it”.
However, the bench put in a caveat by ruling that such a person (squatter) must necessarily first admit ownership of the true owner over the property and make the true owner a party to the suit before a court for claiming ownership over the property through adverse possession.
This ruling came in a case where a Muslim man had claimed ownership over a property through adverse possession in Jalgaon of Maharashtra. He had attempted to advance the plea of adverse possession to claim ownership rights over the property, which was inherited by a Muslim woman after the death of her father.
Setting aside a Bombay high court order in favour of the man, the SC bench said, “When both courts below held and, in our view rightly, that the defendant has failed to prove the plea of adverse possession, then such concurrent finding of fact was unimpeachable and binding on the HC. The HC erred fundamentally in observing that it was not necessary for the defendant to first admit the ownership of the plaintiff before raising such a plea.”
You are so negligent even now. Created documents like affidavits of neighbors, Panchanama/Mahajars from Revenue departments so and so for the then claim it as owner on the principle of adverse possession.
=================================================
ADVERSE POSSESSION
In other words, whether Article 65 of the Act only enables a person to set up a plea of adverse possession as a shield as a defendant and such a plea cannot be used as a sword by a plaintiff to protect the possession of immovable property or to recover it in case of dispossession
Plea Of Adverse Possession – A Shield As Well As A Sword, Clarifies Supreme Court
https://www.mondaq.com/india/trials-appeals-compensation/844224/plea-of-adverse-possession-a-shield-as-well-as-a-sword-clarifies-supreme-court
There are many judgments and the recent one is as follows:
======================================================================
Protest within 12 years or lose property to squatter
======================================================================
ONE THE ABOVE FORMULA THE OPPOSITE PARTY LOSE ITS CASE.
If a person does not protest someone illegally occupying his property for 12 years, then the squatter would get ownership rights over that property, the Supreme Court has ruled.
A bench of Justices R K Agrawal and A M Sapre said if a person proved actual, peaceful and uninterrupted possession of a property owned by another for more than 12 years, “a case of adverse possession can be held to be made out which, in turn, results in depriving the true owner of his ownership rights in the property and vests ownership rights of the property in the person who claims it”.
However, the bench put in a caveat by ruling that such a person (squatter) must necessarily first admit ownership of the true owner over the property and make the true owner a party to the suit before a court for claiming ownership over the property through adverse possession.
This ruling came in a case where a Muslim man had claimed ownership over a property through adverse possession in Jalgaon of Maharashtra. He had attempted to advance the plea of adverse possession to claim ownership rights over the property, which was inherited by a Muslim woman after the death of her father.
Setting aside a Bombay high court order in favour of the man, the SC bench said, “When both courts below held and, in our view rightly, that the defendant has failed to prove the plea of adverse possession, then such concurrent finding of fact was unimpeachable and binding on the HC. The HC erred fundamentally in observing that it was not necessary for the defendant to first admit the ownership of the plaintiff before raising such a plea.”
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Read Related Answers
Decree by court i r o Specific PERFORMANCE of contract agreement
Dear Sir,
It is a disputed issue which has to be decided again by the Civil Court and you must seek cancellation of such judgment since you are in possession of regular Sale Deed before judgment was p...
Property and Home loan
Dear Sir,
It is a complicated issue. Now a days you cannot believe even the family members. If you go legally it will take years together. If there is possibility take possession of some part of the h...
Remove co owner from FLAT BBA if he is not giving his consent
Dear Sir,
You have to get issue a legal notice to remove co-owners name as it was only for name sake as there was no contribution from him. If builder did not do that then you have to approach Civil C...
Land dispute
Dear Sir,
Approach Civil Court and get permanent injunction against him as he is unnecessarily interfering with your legal possession. If anything is encroached by you it has been perfected by way of...
Partition suit - Rent being given to Non legal heir
Dear Sir,
My answers are as follows:
1. How do I recover this 50% money which is being transferred to my aunty? Aunty is not the legal heir. My brother and I are legal heirs.
Ans: Your aunty is a str...
Read Blogs on Property
Property Lawyers
Find Lawyers by Location
