Section 138 - My friend has taken a loan Section 138 - My friend has taken a loan

1 year ago

My friend has taken a loan and has submitted blank cheque as security. She couldn't close it and entered a settlement with the bank for 1.5 lakhs and gave 3 cheques of 50 thousand each. Out of the three cheques 2 were encased by the bank but she lost job during covid and could not pay the last cheque amount.
Now bank has deposited the first security cheque in bank for total amount (principal and interest) instead of the last 50 thousand cheque and filed a case under section 138 of NI act. I seek advice on what should be our line of action now.
Please help.

Anik

Responded 1 year ago

View All Answers
A.Dear client, I am sorry to hear that but in this case one have to file a bail petition and then proceed to pay the amount. However, if that is not a criminal case then he can sort it out out of the court.
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Abhimanyu Shandilya

Responded 1 year ago

View All Answers
A.Dear Client
If a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of NI Act has been filed then first of all your friend needs to take a bail and during the pendency of case try to pay the due amount so that the bank can withdraw the case and end it all.
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Subhashis Paul

Responded 1 year ago

A.Firstly the accused person need to take bail and then she can settle out the matter by amicable settlement with the bank authority through her advocate.
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Jagannath S Pawar

Responded 1 year ago

A.You can contest the case well and simultaneously apply for compounding of offence by paying cheque amount of 50000. Regards other demand of entire payment it is to be contested on merit wherein you have bright chances of winning as security cheque should not be encashed once loans are cleared or near closing through settlement process like in your case. They must be taking recourse to the demand of entire payment under the pretext that settlement has failed due to bouncing of 50000 cheque but ultimately on merit you should win if contested well in court of Law. Concrete and conclusive advice can only be given once your documents are seen.

Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Read Related Answers

question iconMisuse of security cheque
Dear Client, When a person issues a post-dated cheque against a promise or against any refund of money refundable by her or him and in the absence of any agreement, the cheque receiver holding the sai...
question iconCheque bounce - investment expert
Dear Client, Incidentally, cryptocurrency/asset trading is neither illegal nor regulated by any specific legislation yet in India. The National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal(NCCRP) is an initiative of...
question iconFake cheque bounce case
Dear Client, To address a false complaint or false criminal proceedings filed against you, you can seek its quashing through a petition before the High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal...
question iconFD as a security for bail
Dear Client, Generally, FD can considered as a legitimate form of security for bail in cheque bounce case. However, in most of the cases it involves specific procedural requisites, wherein, the bank c...
question iconCheque bounce due to stop payment.
Dear Sir, You just file cheque bounce case against him and then let him contest the case and prove his defence which is very hard.