Whether all Hindu bengalis by birth are under Dayabhaga Law?
5 years ago
Whether all bengalis (Hindu) from West Bengal by birth are under Dayabhaga law?
Where from and how to confirm whether I am under Dayabhaga or Mitakshara Law?
Whether Dayabhaga law still exist after Hindu Succession Act 1956?
Whether I have no right on Ancestral property (passed on for four generation, undivided) which is presently recorded in RS record in my fathers name?
Deepak Yashwantrao Bade
Responded 5 years ago
A.Dear client the Mitakshara and dayabhaga are parent laws. Different is about rights and liability. Your ancestral tree will confirm which law will apply on you.hindu succession Act also depends on both schools of law
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Rameshwar Dadhe
Responded 5 years ago
A.By advocate Rameshwor dadhe dear sir
The differences between the Dayabhaga and the Mitakshara schools of law may be categorized under the following:-
1.Joint Family: – According to the Mitakshara law school a joint family refers only to the male member of a family and extends to include his son, grandson and great-grandson. They collectively have co-ownership/Coparcenary in the Joint Family.Thus a son by birth acquires an interest in the ancestral property of the joint family. Under the Dayabhaga law school the son has no automatic ownership right by birth but acquires it on the demise of his father.
2.Coparcenary/Co-ownership:-Under the Mitakshara law school all the members of the Joint family enjoy coparcenary rights during the father’s lifetime. Under Dayabhaga School when the father is alive the sons do not have coparcenary rights but acquire it on the death of the father. In the Mitakshara School the coparcener’s share is not defined and cannot be disposed. In the Dayabhaga the share of each Coparcener is defined and can be disposed.
Partition: – While both the Mitakshara and the Dayabhaga schools hold that the true test of partition is in the intention to separate the manifestation of this intention is different in each of the schools. In the case of the Mitakshara School the intention involves holding the property in defined definite shares while in the Dayabhaga School there has to be a physical separation of the property into specific portions and assigning of separate share to each coparcener.
4.Rights of Woman: – In the Mitakshara system the wife cannot demand partition. She however has the right to a share in any partition affected between her husband and her sons. Under the Dayabhaga this right does not exist for the women because the sons cannot demand partition as the father is the absolute owner.
In both the systems, in any partition among the sons, the mother is entitled to a share equal to that of a son. Similarly when a son dies before partition leaving the mother as his heir, the mother is entitled to a share of her deceased son as well as share in her own right when there is a partition between the remaining sons.
The widow succeeds the father’s property rights on his death, even in cases where he held property jointly with his brother.
The differences between the Dayabhaga and the Mitakshara schools of law may be categorized under the following:-
1.Joint Family: – According to the Mitakshara law school a joint family refers only to the male member of a family and extends to include his son, grandson and great-grandson. They collectively have co-ownership/Coparcenary in the Joint Family.Thus a son by birth acquires an interest in the ancestral property of the joint family. Under the Dayabhaga law school the son has no automatic ownership right by birth but acquires it on the demise of his father.
2.Coparcenary/Co-ownership:-Under the Mitakshara law school all the members of the Joint family enjoy coparcenary rights during the father’s lifetime. Under Dayabhaga School when the father is alive the sons do not have coparcenary rights but acquire it on the death of the father. In the Mitakshara School the coparcener’s share is not defined and cannot be disposed. In the Dayabhaga the share of each Coparcener is defined and can be disposed.
Partition: – While both the Mitakshara and the Dayabhaga schools hold that the true test of partition is in the intention to separate the manifestation of this intention is different in each of the schools. In the case of the Mitakshara School the intention involves holding the property in defined definite shares while in the Dayabhaga School there has to be a physical separation of the property into specific portions and assigning of separate share to each coparcener.
4.Rights of Woman: – In the Mitakshara system the wife cannot demand partition. She however has the right to a share in any partition affected between her husband and her sons. Under the Dayabhaga this right does not exist for the women because the sons cannot demand partition as the father is the absolute owner.
In both the systems, in any partition among the sons, the mother is entitled to a share equal to that of a son. Similarly when a son dies before partition leaving the mother as his heir, the mother is entitled to a share of her deceased son as well as share in her own right when there is a partition between the remaining sons.
The widow succeeds the father’s property rights on his death, even in cases where he held property jointly with his brother.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
GANESH SHARMA
Responded 5 years ago
A.Mitakshara and dayabhaga are parent laws. Different is about rights. Your ancestral tree will confirm which law will apply on you
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Kavery Anand
Responded 5 years ago
A.The Dāyabhāga is a Hindu law treatise written by Jīmūtavāhana which primarily focuses on inheritance procedure. ... The Dāyabhāga does not give the sons a right to their father's ancestral property until after his death, unlike Mitākṣarā, which gives the sons the right to ancestral property upon their birth.this law is No more exist.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Read Related Answers
property issue
Dear Client,
Firstly you have your equal right to share of your ancestral property as per the 2005 amendment act where even women have equal right in the property. additionally nobody can threaten yo...
Property
Dear Client,
No other individual can sell your property without authentic documentation and consent. make sure you have had the right registered documents of the land and understand how the owner cou...
Covered garage
Dear Client,
The owner of a property is liable to pay the property tax levied by the local civic body i.e, the Municipal Authority. This tax may vary from one location to another and various other fac...
Government Land Occupying
Dear Client,
The Government land cannot be a subject matter of a transaction between the private parties. Instead, the Government acquires private land whenever required for public purposes under the...
Balcony extension
Dear Sir,
Yes, you can do so with the formal permission of either association people or builder. You may file representation before them and get consent.
Read Blogs on Property
Property Lawyers
Find Lawyers by Location