Not giving property rights in my late father's property. Not giving property rights in my late father's property.

5 years ago

Dear sir/mam,
Myself akrit with due concern want to ask a question.
My father has died in childhood and my mother has taken his job( post has been degraded). My father was 4 brothers. But my mother has a second marriage and my father's name has been changed in all my certificates as my mother got 2nd marriage. Will it be possible to claim my grandfather's property on the basis of my mothers compassionate job as she has taken my fathers job. In certificate nowhere my father(1st ) name is mentioned. I have the certificates of my late father where grandfather's name is mentioned but my father's name is changed. Just one evidence I have i.e. kundali(birth chart) where his name is mentioned. I have read some cases where Hindu inheritance act confirms class 1, class 2 and class 3 group of persons who can inherit the property but don't have much clarity. Please guide me on this on how to proceed.
Thanks a lot
With regards
Akrit

ROBERT D ROZARIO

Responded 5 years ago

A.If you are adopted by second husband of your mother then you're not entitled to the property (ancestral or self-acquired) of your biological father. As for the right of the mother is concerned follow the advice of Advocate Deepak Bade.
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Deepak Yashwantrao Bade

Responded 5 years ago

A.The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in a recent judgment has ruled that a widow, even after she has remarried, has the rights over her former husband's properties. The petition was filed by a man against his former sister-in-law who had claimed the right over her deceased husband’s properties after she married another man.
The brother of the deceased relied on the provisions of Section 2 of the the Hindu Widows' Re-marriage Act, 1856, which reads as under:

“2. Rights of widow in deceased husband's property to cease on her remarriage –

All rights and interests which any widow may have in her deceased husband's property by way of maintenance, or by inheritance to her husband or to his lineal successors, or by virtue of any will or testamentary disposition conferring upon her, without express permission to re-marry only a limited interest in such property, with no power of alienating the same, shall upon her re-marriage cease and determine as if she had then died; and the next heirs of her deceased husband, or other person entitled to the property on her death, shall thereupon succeed to the same.”
On the strength of this provision, the only argument advanced was that the limited right and interest which a widow had in her deceased husband’s property would cease to exist if she remarries without express permission, and the next heirs of her deceased husband, or other persons entitled to the property, shall thereupon succeed to the same.

Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 which provides the general rules of succession in case of males which reads as under:

“ 8.General rules of succession in the case of males –

The property of a male Hindu dying intestate shall devolve according to the provisions of this Chapter -

(a) firstly, upon the heirs, being the relatives specified in class I of the Schedule

(b) secondly, if there is no heir of class I, then upon the heirs, being the relatives specified in class II of the Schedule;

(c) thirdly, if there is no heir of any of the two classes, then upon the agnates of the deceased; and

(d) lastly, if there is no agnate, then upon the cognates of the deceased.”

The Court ruled that provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 would prevail over the repealed Hindu Widows' Remarriage Act, 1856. There was no provision in the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 which was pari materia with section 2 of the Hindu Widows' Re-Marriage Act, 1856. The Court further observed the widow even after remarriage would qualify as Class I heir and the husband's kin would still be a Class II heir. Section 9 provides the order of succession among heirs and stipulates that among the heirs specified in the Schedule, those in Class I shall take simultaneously and to the exclusion of all other heirs
In the light of the observations above, the Court concluded that a woman doesn't lose rights over her dead husband's properties - moveable and immoveable even if she remarries.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Placeholder image

Akrit Kishan

Replied 5 years ago

Dear Deepak,
It's my humble request . Can you please provide me the details of the case.
Thanks
Akrit

Placeholder image

Deepak Yashwantrao Bade

Replied 5 years ago

Come on paid consultation.

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Read Related Answers

question iconForcefully shifting PG
Dear Client, A dispute between a tenant/PG and landlord/Building owner is resolved under the state-specific Rent Control Act under which a Rent Controller or Addl Rent Controller is appointed to deal...
question iconLand purchase from Scheduled caste belonging person
Dear Sir, Please take opinion from local senior civil Advocate and see that whether there was any clog period within which such land was not supposed to sell.
question iconLand purchase from Scheduled caste belonging person
Dear Client Here are your answers. 1. Yes you can and you should lodge police complaint against that person and bring him to the books. Before you can lodge a police complaint you can send a legal not...
question iconRTI
Dear Client, In India, the Right to Information (RTI) Act allows citizens to request information from government authorities or public bodies. However, obtaining information about the owner of a spe...
question iconcapital gain and property valuation
Dear Client, In your situation, determining the valuation of the property for sale can be complex due to various factors, such as the historical construction of the property, its transformation into...